Cultural Biases of Large Language Models and Humans in Historical Interpretation
arXiv:2504.02572v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: This paper compares historical annotations by humans and Large Language Models. The findings reveal that both exhibit some cultural bias, but Large Language Models achieve a higher consensus on the interpretation of historical facts from short texts. While humans tend to disagree on the basis of their personal biases, Large Models disagree when they skip information or produce hallucinations. These findings have significant implications for digital humanities, enabling large-scale annotation and quantitative analysis of historical data. This — Fabio Celli, Georgios Spathulas
View PDF
Abstract:This paper compares historical annotations by humans and Large Language Models. The findings reveal that both exhibit some cultural bias, but Large Language Models achieve a higher consensus on the interpretation of historical facts from short texts. While humans tend to disagree on the basis of their personal biases, Large Models disagree when they skip information or produce hallucinations. These findings have significant implications for digital humanities, enabling large-scale annotation and quantitative analysis of historical data. This offers new educational and research opportunities to explore historical interpretations from different Language Models, fostering critical thinking about bias.
Subjects:
Computation and Language (cs.CL)
Cite as: arXiv:2504.02572 [cs.CL]
(or arXiv:2504.02572v2 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2504.02572
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
Submission history
From: Fabio Celli PhD [view email] [v1] Thu, 3 Apr 2025 13:37:45 UTC (680 KB) [v2] Sun, 29 Mar 2026 08:57:51 UTC (680 KB)
Sign in to highlight and annotate this article
Conversation starters
Daily AI Digest
Get the top 5 AI stories delivered to your inbox every morning.
More about
researchpaperarxiv
Accelerate the path from molecule to market
Siemens and Dotmatics: forward together   The pharmaceutical industry is undergoing one of the most profound transformations in its history. The pressure on companies to innovate faster and more efficiently grows as demographics shift, patients’ life expectancies rise, therapeutic complexity increases, development costs surge and regulatory expectations change as technology evolves. Yet, while manufacturing has embraced digitalization, research and development (R&D) teams remain hindered by […]
Knowledge Map
Connected Articles — Knowledge Graph
This article is connected to other articles through shared AI topics and tags.
Discussion
Sign in to join the discussion
No comments yet — be the first to share your thoughts!