Live
Black Hat USAAI BusinessBlack Hat AsiaAI BusinessAI Impact: Focus on Clarity, Results & Sophistication - FTI ConsultingGoogle News: AIClaude Code Source Code "Rebranded" Amid Wild Web Cloning, Anthropic's Blocking Attempt Fails - 36 KrGoogle News: ClaudeHackers slipped a trojan into the code library behind most of the internet. Your team is probably affectedVentureBeat AIThe Great Claude Code Leak of 2026: Accident, Incompetence, or the Best PR Stunt in AI History?DEV CommunityAnthropic Accidentally Releases Source Code for Claude AI AgentBloomberg TechnologyAI 週報:2026/3/27–4/1 Anthropic 一週三震、Arm 首顆自研晶片、Oracle 裁三萬人押注 AIDEV CommunityHow The US, Israel And Iran Are Using AI-Led Tactics In Battle; What It Means For The Future Of Conflicts - News18GNews AI USAMercor confirmed it was affected by a recent supply chain attack involving LiteLLM; hacker group Lapsus$ claims it accessed and stole Mercor's data (Jagmeet Singh/TechCrunch)TechmemeAI-driven mobility report positions UAE as test-bed for next-gen travel services - VisaHQGNews AI UAETutorials vs. Transformations: What Beauty Content Wins in 2026Dev.to AIAnthropic employee error exposes Claude Code source - InfoWorldGoogle News: ClaudeMy son pleasured himself on Gemini Live. Entire family's Google accounts bannedHacker News TopBlack Hat USAAI BusinessBlack Hat AsiaAI BusinessAI Impact: Focus on Clarity, Results & Sophistication - FTI ConsultingGoogle News: AIClaude Code Source Code "Rebranded" Amid Wild Web Cloning, Anthropic's Blocking Attempt Fails - 36 KrGoogle News: ClaudeHackers slipped a trojan into the code library behind most of the internet. Your team is probably affectedVentureBeat AIThe Great Claude Code Leak of 2026: Accident, Incompetence, or the Best PR Stunt in AI History?DEV CommunityAnthropic Accidentally Releases Source Code for Claude AI AgentBloomberg TechnologyAI 週報:2026/3/27–4/1 Anthropic 一週三震、Arm 首顆自研晶片、Oracle 裁三萬人押注 AIDEV CommunityHow The US, Israel And Iran Are Using AI-Led Tactics In Battle; What It Means For The Future Of Conflicts - News18GNews AI USAMercor confirmed it was affected by a recent supply chain attack involving LiteLLM; hacker group Lapsus$ claims it accessed and stole Mercor's data (Jagmeet Singh/TechCrunch)TechmemeAI-driven mobility report positions UAE as test-bed for next-gen travel services - VisaHQGNews AI UAETutorials vs. Transformations: What Beauty Content Wins in 2026Dev.to AIAnthropic employee error exposes Claude Code source - InfoWorldGoogle News: ClaudeMy son pleasured himself on Gemini Live. Entire family's Google accounts bannedHacker News Top

NIST Researchers Develop More Accurate Formula for Measuring Particle Concentration

nist.govby Sarah HendersonAugust 20, 20251 min read0 views
Source Quiz

The new method will be useful in various fields, including nanomedicine, food science, environmental science and advanced manufacturing.

Researchers can use a metric called the particle number concentration (PNC) to calculate the number of particles in a sample, such as the number of marbles in a jar.

Credit:

S. Kelley/Inform Studio

Researchers at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) have developed a new mathematical formula to calculate the concentration of particles suspended in a solution. The new approach, which yields more accurate results than current methods, can be used to deliver the correct drug dosage to patients, measure the amount of nanoplastics in ocean water, and help ensure the correct level of additives in food products, among other applications.

The researchers published their findings in Analytical Chemistry.

“This new formula has the potential to help advance nanotechnology applications, such as food packing and preservation, and the fabrication of microchips and electronic devices,” said NIST engineer Elijah Petersen, who helped test the new formula. “It improves upon current methods by correcting for a common bias that assumes that particles are uniform in size.”

The particle number concentration measures how many particles are present in a given volume of gas or liquid. It is usually expressed in particles per cubic centimeter.

One way to find the concentration of particles suspended in a solution is to use two variables: the total mass of particles in solution and their size. However, the particles’ size can vary. This is referred to as their size distribution.

Current mathematical approaches work well when the particles are nearly uniform in size. However, they can produce inaccurate results when the particles vary significantly in size.

To understand why size distribution is important, imagine a contest where you have to estimate how many candies are in a jar. If the candies are all the same size, say a bunch of M&Ms, then you can use quick calculations to estimate the total number of candies in the jar. But what if the candies are different sizes? Let’s say there are full-size Kit Kats and Reese’s peanut butter cups mixed in. In that case, you would be better off with a different approach.

The new formula, which was derived by former NIST researcher Natalia Farkas, accounts for the variation in particle size to give a more accurate result.

To test the new formula, researchers applied it to samples of gold nanoparticles in water. NIST scientists had previously characterized these samples using multiple laboratory methods, providing highly accurate measurements of their actual particle number concentrations. The results showed that while the previous formulas overestimated the particle number concentration by about 6%, the new formula was accurate to within 1% of the directly measured value.

Researchers then applied the new formula to a more practical example: an anti-caking agent used in food production. Unlike the gold nanoparticles, which have a relatively narrow size distribution, the particles in this material varied widely in size. In this case, the estimates from the new and old formulas differed by as much as 36%.

“There are different ways to calculate the particle number concentration,” Petersen said. “Choosing the right formula can make a big difference.”

Paper: Natalia Farkas, John A. Kramar, Antonio R. Montoro Bustos, George Caceres, Monique Johnson, Matthias Roesslein and Elijah J. Petersen. Derivation of Particle Number Concentration from the Size Distribution: Theory and Applications. Analytical Chemistry. Published online May 16, 2025. DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.4c05990

Was this article helpful?

Sign in to highlight and annotate this article

AI
Ask AI about this article
Powered by AI News Hub · full article context loaded
Ready

Conversation starters

Ask anything about this article…

Daily AI Digest

Get the top 5 AI stories delivered to your inbox every morning.

More about

research

Knowledge Map

Knowledge Map
TopicsEntitiesSource
NIST Resear…researchnist.gov

Connected Articles — Knowledge Graph

This article is connected to other articles through shared AI topics and tags.

Knowledge Graph100 articles · 162 connections
Scroll to zoom · drag to pan · click to open

Discussion

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet — be the first to share your thoughts!

More in Research Papers