User-preference alignment with uncertainty-aware interactive rectification for liver organ and tumor segmentation and analysis from CT images
npj Digital Medicine, Published online: 03 April 2026; doi:10.1038/s41746-026-02544-2 User-preference alignment with uncertainty-aware interactive rectification for liver organ and tumor segmentation and analysis from CT images
Could not retrieve the full article text.
Read on nature.com →Sign in to highlight and annotate this article
Conversation starters
Daily AI Digest
Get the top 5 AI stories delivered to your inbox every morning.
More about
analysisalignmentpublished
Show HN: EU Compliance SaaS for Sale ($4K Each) – CBAM, AI Act, Public Tenders
I built 4 SaaS products targeting mandatory EU regulations. Each for $4,000. 1. CBAM OS (cbam-os.com) - EU Carbon Border Tax compliance for importers 2. AIA Proof (aiaproof.com) - AI Act compliance & AI detection 3. AO France (ao-france.fr) - AI-powered public tender responses (FR) 4. AO Copilot (ao-copilot.fr) - BTP tender analysis, 20 modules, 1900+ tests All mandatory regulations = guaranteed market. Modern stack (Next.js, Supabase). Production-ready. Contact: [email protected] Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47632626 Points: 1 # Comments: 0
Label-free pathological subtyping of non-small cell lung cancer using deep classification and virtual immunohistochemical staining
npj Digital Medicine, Published online: 03 April 2026; doi:10.1038/s41746-026-02557-x Label-free pathological subtyping of non-small cell lung cancer using deep classification and virtual immunohistochemical staining
First time NeurIPS. How different is it from low-ranked conferences? [D]
I'm a PhD student and already published papers in A/B ranked paper (10+). My field of work never allowed me to work on something really exciting and a core A* conference. But finally after years I think I have work worthy of some discussion at the top venue. I'm referring to papers (my field and top papers) from previous editions and I notice that there's a big difference on how people write, how they put their message on table and also it is too theoretical sometimes. Are there any golden rules people follow who frequently get into these conferences? Should I be soft while making novelty claims? Also those who moved from submitting to niche-conferences to NeurIPS/ICML/CVPR, did you change your approach? My field is imaging in healthcare. submitted by /u/ade17_in [link] [comments]
Knowledge Map
Connected Articles — Knowledge Graph
This article is connected to other articles through shared AI topics and tags.
Discussion
Sign in to join the discussion
No comments yet — be the first to share your thoughts!