From Physics to Surrogate Intelligence: A Unified Electro-Thermo-Optimization Framework for TSV Networks
arXiv:2603.29268v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: High-density through-substrate vias (TSVs) enable 2.5D/3D heterogeneous integration but introduce significant signal-integrity and thermal-reliability challenges due to electrical coupling, insertion loss, and self-heating. Conventional full-wave finite-element method (FEM) simulations provide high accuracy but become computationally prohibitive for large design-space exploration. This work presents a scalable electro-thermal modeling and optimization framework that combines physics-informed analytical modeling, graph neural network (GNN) surrogates, and full-wave sign-off validation. A multi-conductor analytical model computes broadband S-parameters and effective anisotropic thermal conductivities of TSV arrays, achieving $5\%-10\%$ relative
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:High-density through-substrate vias (TSVs) enable 2.5D/3D heterogeneous integration but introduce significant signal-integrity and thermal-reliability challenges due to electrical coupling, insertion loss, and self-heating. Conventional full-wave finite-element method (FEM) simulations provide high accuracy but become computationally prohibitive for large design-space exploration. This work presents a scalable electro-thermal modeling and optimization framework that combines physics-informed analytical modeling, graph neural network (GNN) surrogates, and full-wave sign-off validation. A multi-conductor analytical model computes broadband S-parameters and effective anisotropic thermal conductivities of TSV arrays, achieving $5%-10%$ relative Frobenius error (RFE) across array sizes up to $15x15$. A physics-informed GNN surrogate (TSV-PhGNN), trained on analytical data and fine-tuned with HFSS simulations, generalizes to larger arrays with RFE below $2%$ and nearly constant variance. The surrogate is integrated into a multi-objective Pareto optimization framework targeting reflection coefficient, insertion loss, worst-case crosstalk (NEXT/FEXT), and effective thermal conductivity. Millions of TSV configurations can be explored within minutes, enabling exhaustive layout and geometric optimization that would be infeasible using FEM alone. Final designs are validated with Ansys HFSS and Mechanical, showing strong agreement. The proposed framework enables rapid electro-thermal co-design of TSV arrays while reducing per-design evaluation time by more than six orders of magnitude.
Comments: Submitted to IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems (IEEE TCAD)
Subjects:
Machine Learning (cs.LG); Hardware Architecture (cs.AR)
Cite as: arXiv:2603.29268 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2603.29268v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.29268
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
Submission history
From: Mohamed Gharib [view email] [v1] Tue, 31 Mar 2026 05:10:33 UTC (24,321 KB)
Sign in to highlight and annotate this article

Conversation starters
Daily AI Digest
Get the top 5 AI stories delivered to your inbox every morning.
More about
modelneural networkannounce
Big Tech firms are accelerating AI investments and integration, while regulators and companies focus on safety and responsible adoption.
The AI landscape is experiencing unprecedented growth and transformation. This post delves into the key developments shaping the future of artificial intelligence, from massive industry investments to critical safety considerations and integration into core development processes. Key Areas Explored: Record-Breaking Investments: Major tech firms are committing billions to AI infrastructure, signaling a significant acceleration in the field. AI in Software Development: We examine how companies are leveraging AI for code generation and the implications for engineering workflows. Safety and Responsibility: The increasing focus on ethical AI development and protecting vulnerable users, particularly minors. Market Dynamics: How AI is influencing stock performance, cloud computing strategies, and

135,000 OpenClaw Users Just Got a 50x Price Hike. Anthropic Says It's 'Unsustainable.'
Originally published at news.skila.ai A single OpenClaw session can burn through $1,000 to $5,000 in compute. Anthropic was eating that cost on a $200/month Max plan. As of April 4, 2026 at 12pm PT, that arrangement is dead. More than 135,000 OpenClaw instances were running when Anthropic flipped the switch. Claude Pro ($20/month) and Max ($200/month) subscribers can no longer route their flat-rate plans through OpenClaw or any third-party agentic tool. The affected users now face cost increases of up to 50 times what they were paying. This is the biggest pricing disruption in the AI developer tool space since OpenAI killed free API access in 2023. And the ripple effects reach far beyond Anthropic's customer base. What Actually Happened (and Why) Boris Cherny, Head of Claude Code at Anthro

Gemma 4 Complete Guide: Architecture, Models, and Deployment in 2026
Google DeepMind released Gemma 4 on April 3, 2026 under Apache 2.0 — a significant licensing shift from previous Gemma releases that makes it genuinely usable for commercial products without legal ambiguity. This guide covers the full model family, architecture decisions worth understanding, and practical deployment paths across cloud, local, and mobile. The Four Models and When to Use Each Gemma 4 ships in four sizes with meaningfully different architectures: Model Params Active Architecture VRAM (4-bit) Target E2B ~2.3B all Dense + PLE ~2GB Mobile / edge E4B ~4.5B all Dense + PLE ~3.6GB Laptop / tablet 26B A4B 25.2B 3.8B MoE ~16GB Consumer GPU 31B 30.7B all Dense ~18GB Workstation The E2B result is the most surprising: multiple community benchmarks confirm it outperforms Gemma 3 27B on s
Knowledge Map
Connected Articles — Knowledge Graph
This article is connected to other articles through shared AI topics and tags.
More in Models

Один промпт заменил мне 3 часа дебага в день
Вечерами, когда большинство уже отдыхает, я зависаю в своём офисе и ковыряюсь с кодом. Тот 14 августа, в 21:45, не был исключением. Я опять сидел над этой задачей, которая съедала по три часа каждый день. Почему это была боль Всё началось с простого: проект на Python, который выглядел как очередное рутинное задание. Однако вычисления упорно выдавали ошибочные результаты. Три дня подряд я безуспешно искал причину. Как обычно, приходилось проверять каждую строчку, каждую переменную. Это было настоящим адом. Для фрилансера с жесткими сроками это катастрофа - теряешь время, не зарабатываешь, а заказчик ждёт. Я собрал промпты по этой теме в PDF. Забери бесплатно: https://t.me/airozov_bot Как я нашёл решение Тогда я решил попробовать ChatGPT, хотя и не особо верил в его чудеса. Вбил проблему в п
ciflow/torchtitan/179381: Update on "[wip][dynamo] Reduce special casing for namedtuple objects"
UserDefinedTupleVariable previously lived in user_defined.py while NamedTupleVariable lived in lists.py and subclassed it across module boundaries. NamedTupleVariable also conflated two unrelated things: Python namedtuples (collections.namedtuple with _tuplegetter descriptors and Type( args) construction) and C-implemented structseqs (torch.return_types. with Type(iterable) construction and tp_new safety checks that reject tuple. new ). Split into three classes, all in user_defined.py: UserDefinedTupleVariable (base): plain tuple subclasses NamedTupleVariable: Python namedtuples, overrides resolve_data_descriptor for _tuplegetter, as_python_constant, as_proxy, reconstruct (uses _make) StructSequenceVariable: torch.return_types.* structseqs, overrides as_python_constant, as_proxy, reconstru



Discussion
Sign in to join the discussion
No comments yet — be the first to share your thoughts!