Coefficient Giving is seeking proposals for biosecurity projects
Coefficient Giving’s Biosecurity and Pandemic Preparedness team is launching a new Request for Proposals to support work aimed at preventing engineered biological threats from emerging and improving our response to these threats should prevention fail. Applications start with a simple expression of interest form (≤500 words), with a submission deadline of May 11 2026 at 11:59pm PT. Click here to learn more and apply More details We expect that the coming years will see unprecedented progress in AI and biotechnology. While the ability of AI systems to improve human health could be transformative, these same advances may increase existential risk via multiple pathways: AI could lower barriers for bad actors pursuing novel biological weapons, and increasingly capable AI systems may themselves
Coefficient Giving’s Biosecurity and Pandemic Preparedness team is launching a new Request for Proposals to support work aimed at preventing engineered biological threats from emerging and improving our response to these threats should prevention fail.
Applications start with a simple expression of interest form (≤500 words), with a submission deadline of May 11 2026 at 11:59pm PT.
Click here to learn more and apply
More details
We expect that the coming years will see unprecedented progress in AI and biotechnology. While the ability of AI systems to improve human health could be transformative, these same advances may increase existential risk via multiple pathways: AI could lower barriers for bad actors pursuing novel biological weapons, and increasingly capable AI systems may themselves leverage biotechnology in harmful ways. Separately, biotech advances could also introduce catastrophic risks from even well-intentioned actors—for example, through the creation of mirror bacteria.
We feel these problems are increasingly urgent, and our team is looking to spend more and spend faster as a result. (We expect to direct >$100 million in grants this year.)
To that end, we’re interested in funding ambitious projects in the following categories:
- Transmission suppression: Enhance society’s capacity to respond to global biological catastrophes (e.g. stockpiling PPE or developing transmission suppression technologies like air filters and disinfectant vapors)
- Tech safeguards and governance: Reduce risks from advanced biological capabilities through technical safeguards and governance of high-risk technologies, particularly at the intersection of AI and biology (e.g. synthesis screening, misuse classifiers)
- Policy and advocacy: Inform decisionmakers about risks and mitigations, support policymaking in key jurisdictions, and develop governance approaches for high-risk technologies (e.g. mirror bacteria)
- Field-building: Build the field by attracting talented people to work on these problems and fast-tracking their path to impact (e.g. fellowships, events, accelerators, media)
To learn more about our priorities and strategy, you can read our blog or listen to a recent podcast appearance by our team’s Managing Director, Andrew Snyder-Beattie.
We encourage you to strongly consider submitting a quick expression of interest, even if you're not sure whether your project fits perfectly or is sufficiently well thought out. We’ve noticed that people with exciting proposals are often too slow to ask for funding. Anyone is eligible to apply, including those working in academia, nonprofits, industry, or independently. Please email [email protected] with questions.
If you don’t have a specific project in mind but instead are an individual looking to make a career transition into biosecurity, we encourage you to apply for funding through our Career Transition Development Funding program.
Alternatively, if you are interested in potentially contributing to the field but aren’t yet ready to apply for a grant, please register your interest here.
LessWrong AI
https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/BHfcc4ofJGRzadbT9/coefficient-giving-is-seeking-proposals-for-biosecuritySign in to highlight and annotate this article

Conversation starters
Daily AI Digest
Get the top 5 AI stories delivered to your inbox every morning.
More about
launchapplicationfundingBlazor WASM's Deputy Thread Model Will Break JavaScript Interop - Here's Why That Matters
<h2> The Problem </h2> <p>Microsoft is changing how .NET runs inside WebAssembly. When you enable threading with <code><WasmEnableThreads>true</WasmEnableThreads></code>, the entire .NET runtime moves off the browser's main thread and onto a background Web Worker — what they call the <strong>"Deputy Thread" model</strong>.</p> <p>This sounds like a good idea on paper. The UI stays responsive. .NET gets real threads. Everyone wins.</p> <p>Except it breaks JavaScript interop. Not in a subtle, edge-case way. It breaks it <em>fundamentally</em>.</p> <h2> What Actually Happens </h2> <p>In traditional Blazor WASM (no threading), .NET and JavaScript share the same thread. When JavaScript calls <code>DotNet.invokeMethod</code>, the CPU jumps from the JS stack to the C# stack and back. It's fast. I
The hidden cost of GPT-4o: what every SaaS founder should know about per-user LLM spend it
<p>So you're running a SaaS that leans on an LLM. You check your OpenAI bill at the end of the month, it's a few hundred bucks, you shrug and move on. As long as it's not five figures, who cares, right?</p> <p>Wrong. That total is hiding a nasty secret: you're probably losing money on some of your users.</p> <p>I'm not talking about the obvious free-tier leeches. I'm talking about paying customers who are costing you more in API calls than they're giving you in subscription fees. You're literally paying for them to use your product.</p> <p><strong>The problem with averages</strong></p> <p>Let's do some quick, dirty math. GPT-4o pricing settled at around $3/1M tokens for input and $10/1M for output. It's cheap, but it's not free.</p> <p>Say you have a summarization feature. A user pastes in
The Wrong Way to Use AI for Debugging (And the Mental Model That Actually Works)
<p>Same AI tool. Same codebase access. Same staging incident. Three experienced engineers spent hours and couldn't find the root cause. I found it in about 20 minutes — and I barely knew what half the tools did.</p> <p>This isn't a story about juniors being better than seniors. It's about a mental model for AI collaboration that anyone can use — and why the "obvious" way most people use AI actually holds them back.</p> <h2> The Incident </h2> <p>A message hits the team Slack channel:</p> <blockquote> <p>"Staging is broken. We're investigating."</p> </blockquote> <p>The error:<br> </p> <div class="highlight js-code-highlight"> <pre class="highlight plaintext"><code>alembic current ERROR: Can't locate revision identified by 'ba29cdc8739d' FAILED: Can't locate revision identified by 'ba29cdc8
Knowledge Map
Connected Articles — Knowledge Graph
This article is connected to other articles through shared AI topics and tags.
More in Market News
OpenAI’s Fund Raise Shows ChatGPT Parent Worth $852 Billion Ahead of IPO. Who Bought. - Barron's
<a href="https://news.google.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?oc=5" target="_blank">OpenAI’s Fund Raise Shows ChatGPT Parent Worth $852 Billion Ahead of IPO. Who Bought.</a> <font color="#6f6f6f">Barron's</font>
OpenAI Closes Silicon Valley’s Largest-Ever Funding Round - wsj.com
<a href="https://news.google.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?oc=5" target="_blank">OpenAI Closes Silicon Valley’s Largest-Ever Funding Round</a> <font color="#6f6f6f">wsj.com</font>
OpenAI’s Fund Raise Shows ChatGPT Parent Worth $852 Billion Ahead of IPO. Who Bought. - Barron's
<a href="https://news.google.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?oc=5" target="_blank">OpenAI’s Fund Raise Shows ChatGPT Parent Worth $852 Billion Ahead of IPO. Who Bought.</a> <font color="#6f6f6f">Barron's</font>

Discussion
Sign in to join the discussion
No comments yet — be the first to share your thoughts!