FeDMRA: Federated Incremental Learning with Dynamic Memory Replay Allocation
arXiv:2603.28455v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: In federated healthcare systems, Federated Class-Incremental Learning (FCIL) has emerged as a key paradigm, enabling continuous adaptive model learning among distributed clients while safeguarding data privacy. However, in practical applications, data across agent nodes within the distributed framework often exhibits non-independent and identically distributed (non-IID) characteristics, rendering traditional continual learning methods inapplicable. To address these challenges, this paper covers more comprehensive incremental task scenarios and — Tiantian Wang, Xiang Xiang, Simon S. Du
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:In federated healthcare systems, Federated Class-Incremental Learning (FCIL) has emerged as a key paradigm, enabling continuous adaptive model learning among distributed clients while safeguarding data privacy. However, in practical applications, data across agent nodes within the distributed framework often exhibits non-independent and identically distributed (non-IID) characteristics, rendering traditional continual learning methods inapplicable. To address these challenges, this paper covers more comprehensive incremental task scenarios and proposes a dynamic memory allocation strategy for exemplar storage based on the data replay mechanism. This strategy fully taps into the inherent potential of data heterogeneity, while taking into account the performance fairness of all participating clients, thereby establishing a balanced and adaptive solution to mitigate catastrophic forgetting. Unlike the fixed allocation of client exemplar memory, the proposed scheme emphasizes the rational allocation of limited storage resources among clients to improve model performance. Furthermore, extensive experiments are conducted on three medical image datasets, and the results demonstrate significant performance improvements compared to existing baseline models.
Subjects:
Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV); Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing (cs.DC); Machine Learning (stat.ML)
Cite as: arXiv:2603.28455 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2603.28455v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.28455
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
Submission history
From: Xiang Xiang [view email] [v1] Mon, 30 Mar 2026 13:58:36 UTC (307 KB)
Sign in to highlight and annotate this article

Conversation starters
Daily AI Digest
Get the top 5 AI stories delivered to your inbox every morning.
More about
researchpaperarxiv
"Cognitive surrender" leads AI users to abandon logical thinking, research finds
Article URL: https://arstechnica.com/ai/2026/04/research-finds-ai-users-scarily-willing-to-surrender-their-cognition-to-llms/ Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47632504 Points: 5 # Comments: 0
![[D] Best websites for pytorch/numpy interviews](https://d2xsxph8kpxj0f.cloudfront.net/310419663032563854/konzwo8nGf8Z4uZsMefwMr/default-img-graph-nodes-a2pnJLpyKmDnxKWLd5BEAb.webp)
[D] Best websites for pytorch/numpy interviews
Hello, I’m at the last year of my PHD and I’m starting to prepare interviews. I’m mainly aiming at applied scientist/research engineer or research scientist role. For now I’m doing mainly leetcode. I’m looking for websites that can help me train for coding interviews in pytorch/numpy. I did some research and these websites popped up: nexskillai, tensorgym, deep-ml, leetgpu and the torch part of neetcode. However I couldn’t really decide which of these websites are the best. I’m open to suggestions in this matter, thanks. submitted by /u/Training-Adeptness57 [link] [comments]
Knowledge Map
Connected Articles — Knowledge Graph
This article is connected to other articles through shared AI topics and tags.
More in Research Papers

Label-free pathological subtyping of non-small cell lung cancer using deep classification and virtual immunohistochemical staining
npj Digital Medicine, Published online: 03 April 2026; doi:10.1038/s41746-026-02557-x Label-free pathological subtyping of non-small cell lung cancer using deep classification and virtual immunohistochemical staining
![First time NeurIPS. How different is it from low-ranked conferences? [D]](https://d2xsxph8kpxj0f.cloudfront.net/310419663032563854/konzwo8nGf8Z4uZsMefwMr/default-img-robot-hand-JvPW6jsLFTCtkgtb97Kys5.webp)
First time NeurIPS. How different is it from low-ranked conferences? [D]
I'm a PhD student and already published papers in A/B ranked paper (10+). My field of work never allowed me to work on something really exciting and a core A* conference. But finally after years I think I have work worthy of some discussion at the top venue. I'm referring to papers (my field and top papers) from previous editions and I notice that there's a big difference on how people write, how they put their message on table and also it is too theoretical sometimes. Are there any golden rules people follow who frequently get into these conferences? Should I be soft while making novelty claims? Also those who moved from submitting to niche-conferences to NeurIPS/ICML/CVPR, did you change your approach? My field is imaging in healthcare. submitted by /u/ade17_in [link] [comments]




Discussion
Sign in to join the discussion
No comments yet — be the first to share your thoughts!