Evolutionary Warm-Starts for Reinforcement Learning in Industrial Continuous Control
arXiv:2603.26750v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Reinforcement learning (RL) is still rarely applied in industrial control, partly due to the difficulty of training reliable agents for real-world conditions. This work investigates how evolution strategies can support RL in such settings by introducing a continuous-control adaptation of an industrial sorting benchmark. The CMA-ES algorithm is used to generate high-quality demonstrations that warm-start RL agents. Results show that CMA-ES-guided initialization significantly improves stability and performance. Furthermore, the demonstration traj — Tom Maus, Stephan Frank, Tobias Glasmachers
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Reinforcement learning (RL) is still rarely applied in industrial control, partly due to the difficulty of training reliable agents for real-world conditions. This work investigates how evolution strategies can support RL in such settings by introducing a continuous-control adaptation of an industrial sorting benchmark. The CMA-ES algorithm is used to generate high-quality demonstrations that warm-start RL agents. Results show that CMA-ES-guided initialization significantly improves stability and performance. Furthermore, the demonstration trajectories generated with the CMA-ES provide a strong oracle reference performance level, which is of interest in its own right. The study delivers a focused proof of concept for hybrid evolutionary-RL approaches and a basis for future, more complex industrial applications.
Comments: 4 pages, 2 figures
Subjects:
Neural and Evolutionary Computing (cs.NE); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
Cite as: arXiv:2603.26750 [cs.NE]
(or arXiv:2603.26750v1 [cs.NE] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.26750
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
Submission history
From: Tom Maus [view email] [v1] Mon, 23 Mar 2026 11:17:23 UTC (171 KB)
Sign in to highlight and annotate this article

Conversation starters
Daily AI Digest
Get the top 5 AI stories delivered to your inbox every morning.
More about
researchpaperarxiv
"Cognitive surrender" leads AI users to abandon logical thinking, research finds
Article URL: https://arstechnica.com/ai/2026/04/research-finds-ai-users-scarily-willing-to-surrender-their-cognition-to-llms/ Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47632504 Points: 5 # Comments: 0
![[D] Best websites for pytorch/numpy interviews](https://d2xsxph8kpxj0f.cloudfront.net/310419663032563854/konzwo8nGf8Z4uZsMefwMr/default-img-graph-nodes-a2pnJLpyKmDnxKWLd5BEAb.webp)
[D] Best websites for pytorch/numpy interviews
Hello, I’m at the last year of my PHD and I’m starting to prepare interviews. I’m mainly aiming at applied scientist/research engineer or research scientist role. For now I’m doing mainly leetcode. I’m looking for websites that can help me train for coding interviews in pytorch/numpy. I did some research and these websites popped up: nexskillai, tensorgym, deep-ml, leetgpu and the torch part of neetcode. However I couldn’t really decide which of these websites are the best. I’m open to suggestions in this matter, thanks. submitted by /u/Training-Adeptness57 [link] [comments]
Knowledge Map
Connected Articles — Knowledge Graph
This article is connected to other articles through shared AI topics and tags.
More in Research Papers

Label-free pathological subtyping of non-small cell lung cancer using deep classification and virtual immunohistochemical staining
npj Digital Medicine, Published online: 03 April 2026; doi:10.1038/s41746-026-02557-x Label-free pathological subtyping of non-small cell lung cancer using deep classification and virtual immunohistochemical staining
![First time NeurIPS. How different is it from low-ranked conferences? [D]](https://d2xsxph8kpxj0f.cloudfront.net/310419663032563854/konzwo8nGf8Z4uZsMefwMr/default-img-robot-hand-JvPW6jsLFTCtkgtb97Kys5.webp)
First time NeurIPS. How different is it from low-ranked conferences? [D]
I'm a PhD student and already published papers in A/B ranked paper (10+). My field of work never allowed me to work on something really exciting and a core A* conference. But finally after years I think I have work worthy of some discussion at the top venue. I'm referring to papers (my field and top papers) from previous editions and I notice that there's a big difference on how people write, how they put their message on table and also it is too theoretical sometimes. Are there any golden rules people follow who frequently get into these conferences? Should I be soft while making novelty claims? Also those who moved from submitting to niche-conferences to NeurIPS/ICML/CVPR, did you change your approach? My field is imaging in healthcare. submitted by /u/ade17_in [link] [comments]




Discussion
Sign in to join the discussion
No comments yet — be the first to share your thoughts!