From Pen to Pixel: Translating Hand-Drawn Plots into Graphical APIs via a Novel Benchmark and Efficient Adapter
arXiv:2603.26356v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: As plots play a critical role in modern data visualization and analysis, Plot2API is launched to help non-experts and beginners create their desired plots by directly recommending graphical APIs from reference plot images by neural networks. However, previous works on Plot2API have primarily focused on the recommendation for standard plot images, while overlooking the hand-drawn plot images that are more accessible to non-experts and beginners. To make matters worse, both Plot2API models trained on standard plot images and powerful multi-modal la — Zhenghao Xu (School of Big Data and Software Engineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing, China), Mengning Yang (School of Big Data and Software Engineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing, China)
Authors:Zhenghao Xu (1), Mengning Yang (1) ((1) School of Big Data and Software Engineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing, China)
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:As plots play a critical role in modern data visualization and analysis, Plot2API is launched to help non-experts and beginners create their desired plots by directly recommending graphical APIs from reference plot images by neural networks. However, previous works on Plot2API have primarily focused on the recommendation for standard plot images, while overlooking the hand-drawn plot images that are more accessible to non-experts and beginners. To make matters worse, both Plot2API models trained on standard plot images and powerful multi-modal large language models struggle to effectively recommend APIs for hand-drawn plot images due to the domain gap and lack of expertise. To facilitate non-experts and beginners, we introduce a hand-drawn plot dataset named HDpy-13 to improve the performance of graphical API recommendations for hand-drawn plot images. Additionally, to alleviate the considerable strain of parameter growth and computational resource costs arising from multi-domain and multi-language challenges in Plot2API, we propose Plot-Adapter that allows for the training and storage of separate adapters rather than requiring an entire model for each language and domain. In particular, Plot-Adapter incorporates a lightweight CNN block to improve the ability to capture local features and implements projection matrix sharing to reduce the number of fine-tuning parameters further. Experimental results demonstrate both the effectiveness of HDpy-13 and the efficiency of Plot-Adapter.
Subjects:
Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV)
Cite as: arXiv:2603.26356 [cs.CV]
(or arXiv:2603.26356v1 [cs.CV] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.26356
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
Submission history
From: Zhenghao Xu [view email] [v1] Fri, 27 Mar 2026 12:27:49 UTC (25,894 KB)
Sign in to highlight and annotate this article
Conversation starters
Daily AI Digest
Get the top 5 AI stories delivered to your inbox every morning.
More about
researchpaperarxiv
![First time NeurIPS. How different is it from low-ranked conferences? [D]](https://d2xsxph8kpxj0f.cloudfront.net/310419663032563854/konzwo8nGf8Z4uZsMefwMr/default-img-robot-hand-JvPW6jsLFTCtkgtb97Kys5.webp)
First time NeurIPS. How different is it from low-ranked conferences? [D]
I'm a PhD student and already published papers in A/B ranked paper (10+). My field of work never allowed me to work on something really exciting and a core A* conference. But finally after years I think I have work worthy of some discussion at the top venue. I'm referring to papers (my field and top papers) from previous editions and I notice that there's a big difference on how people write, how they put their message on table and also it is too theoretical sometimes. Are there any golden rules people follow who frequently get into these conferences? Should I be soft while making novelty claims? Also those who moved from submitting to niche-conferences to NeurIPS/ICML/CVPR, did you change your approach? My field is imaging in healthcare. submitted by /u/ade17_in [link] [comments]
AI can describe human experiences but lacks experience in an actual ‘body.’ UCLA researchers say understanding this ‘body gap’ may matter for safety - UCLA Health
AI can describe human experiences but lacks experience in an actual ‘body.’ UCLA researchers say understanding this ‘body gap’ may matter for safety UCLA Health
Knowledge Map
Connected Articles — Knowledge Graph
This article is connected to other articles through shared AI topics and tags.
More in Research Papers
Label-free pathological subtyping of non-small cell lung cancer using deep classification and virtual immunohistochemical staining
npj Digital Medicine, Published online: 03 April 2026; doi:10.1038/s41746-026-02557-x Label-free pathological subtyping of non-small cell lung cancer using deep classification and virtual immunohistochemical staining
First time NeurIPS. How different is it from low-ranked conferences? [D]
I'm a PhD student and already published papers in A/B ranked paper (10+). My field of work never allowed me to work on something really exciting and a core A* conference. But finally after years I think I have work worthy of some discussion at the top venue. I'm referring to papers (my field and top papers) from previous editions and I notice that there's a big difference on how people write, how they put their message on table and also it is too theoretical sometimes. Are there any golden rules people follow who frequently get into these conferences? Should I be soft while making novelty claims? Also those who moved from submitting to niche-conferences to NeurIPS/ICML/CVPR, did you change your approach? My field is imaging in healthcare. submitted by /u/ade17_in [link] [comments]
Discussion
Sign in to join the discussion
No comments yet — be the first to share your thoughts!