SAP investors, partners raise doubt on firm's AI tools: report (SAP:NYSE) - Seeking Alpha
<a href="https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMingFBVV95cUxQV2tyZ1U1RUdPS2FZUkdGZVZ0N1JCZlM0WWF4b0ZYaWhBNlNmWlBuWjdwYVJpZkYtdjhsRHdpOTRPVlQ1SVhpSWlUdDc0a041RzdqWGN0RG51WWphSlNtZ0pkaGNOZWFicDh6MTJzSmN2ZFpzUEtPM1lKdUFxbFc4NlpZdW9TUjg1WlVpME1XUnc4TU5XOEJnc1A2YUpoZw?oc=5" target="_blank">SAP investors, partners raise doubt on firm's AI tools: report (SAP:NYSE)</a> <font color="#6f6f6f">Seeking Alpha</font>
Could not retrieve the full article text.
Read on Google News - SAP AI Joule →Sign in to highlight and annotate this article
Conversation starters
Daily AI Digest
Get the top 5 AI stories delivered to your inbox every morning.
More about
report
Why I Built a Menu Bar App Instead of a Dashboard
Everyone who builds with AI eventually hits the same moment. You're deep in a coding session. Claude is flying. You're feeling productive. Then you open your API dashboard and the number hits you like a bucket of cold water. That happened to me. I don't want to talk about the exact number, but it was enough to make me stop and actually think about what I was doing. The problem wasn't that I was spending money. The problem was that I had no idea I was spending it. The dashboard problem My first instinct was what everyone does: open the Anthropic dashboard. Check the usage graphs. Try to correlate the spikes with what I was working on. But here's the thing about dashboards — they're designed for after-the-fact analysis, not real-time awareness. You go to a dashboard when something's already
Walmart's AI Checkout Converted 3x Worse. The Interface Is Why.
Walmart put 200,000 products on ChatGPT's Instant Checkout. Users could browse and buy without leaving the chat window. The ultimate frictionless experience. The result: in-chat purchases converted at one-third the rate of clicking out to Walmart's website. Walmart's EVP Daniel Danker called the experience "unsatisfying." OpenAI killed Instant Checkout entirely. This isn't a Walmart problem. It's a pattern — and if you're building AI-powered tools, you're probably making the same mistake. The Perception Gap Is the Real Story In 2025, METR ran a randomized controlled trial with 16 experienced open-source developers. With AI coding tools, they completed tasks 19% slower . But they reported feeling 20% faster . That's a 39 percentage point gap between perception and reality. (A 2026 follow-up
Knowledge Map
Connected Articles — Knowledge Graph
This article is connected to other articles through shared AI topics and tags.
More in Products
Gemma 4 31B sweeps the floor with GLM 5.1
I've been using both side by side over this evening working on a project. Basically I'd paste a chunk of creative text into chat and tell it to dismantle it thesis-by-thesis, then I'd see if the criticism is actually sound, and submit the next iteration of the file which incorporates my solutions to bypassing the criticism. Then move on to the next segment, next file, repeat ad infimum. What I found is that Gemma 4 31B keeps track of the important point very cleanly, maintains unbiased approach over more subsequent turns: GLM basically turns into a yes-man immediately "Woah! Such a genius solution! You really did it! This is so much better omfg, production ready! Poosh-poosh!", Gemma can take at least 3-4 rounds of back and forth and keep a level of constructivism and tell you outright if
Discussion
Sign in to join the discussion
No comments yet — be the first to share your thoughts!