Grammarly has disabled its tool offering generative-AI feedback credited to real writers - Engadget
Grammarly has disabled its tool offering generative-AI feedback credited to real writers Engadget
Could not retrieve the full article text.
Read on Google News: Generative AI →Sign in to highlight and annotate this article
Conversation starters
Daily AI Digest
Get the top 5 AI stories delivered to your inbox every morning.
Knowledge Map
Connected Articles — Knowledge Graph
This article is connected to other articles through shared AI topics and tags.
More in Products
What happens when you give an AI your acceptance criteria and ask it to write test cases?
After years of building frontend applications across e-health and e-learning products, I've sat in enough sprint reviews to notice a pattern: QA test cases are written the same way every time. Happy path first, a handful of negative cases if the deadline allows, edge cases if the tester has seen that bug before. The process is repetitive, experience-dependent, and the first thing to get cut when a release is running late. So I started experimenting — feeding acceptance criteria directly to an AI and asking for a complete test suite. Here's an honest account of what works, what doesn't, and what it actually changes about the process. What the AI gets right immediately The output quality on structured coverage is genuinely impressive. Given clear acceptance criteria, the AI will produce happ
Self-Hosting in 2026: Why It Matters and How to Get Started
Every year, another SaaS tool raises prices, removes features, or shuts down. Your monthly stack — file storage, password management, project tracking, monitoring, analytics, automation — keeps growing. So does the bill. Self-hosting is the alternative. Run the software on your own server, keep your data under your control, and stop paying per-seat fees for tools that are free and open-source. Docker made deployment trivial. Open-source alternatives have matured to rival their commercial counterparts. And a $4–20/month VPS gives you enough compute to run a full stack. Self-hosting in 2026 isn't a niche hobby — it's a practical strategy. What Self-Hosting Means in Practice You install and run applications on a server you control. Your files, passwords, analytics, and workflows stay on your
Built a Lightweight GitHub Action for Deploying to Azure Static Web Apps
TL;DR I created shibayan/swa-deploy — a lightweight GitHub Action that only deploys to Azure Static Web Apps, without the Docker-based build overhead of the official action. It wraps the same StaticSitesClient that SWA CLI uses internally, includes automatic caching, and supports both Deployment Token and azure/login authentication. The Problem with the Official Action When deploying static sites (built with Astro, Vite, etc.) to Azure Static Web Apps, the standard approach is to use the official Azure/static-web-apps-deploy action that gets auto-generated when you link a GitHub repo to your SWA resource. Unlike other Azure deployment actions (e.g., for App Service or Azure Functions), this action uses Oryx — the build engine used across Azure App Service — to build your application intern
Defining and creating a basic Design System based on any website (in Figma and React) using Claude
It's 2026, and MCP and design tooling are constantly changing with various improvements in the AI space. Arguably, one of the most long-awaited features was Figma MCP supporting agents writing to its canvas. The funny thing is, I created a particular workflow 2 weeks ago, the lack of the write to canvas was a bit of a bottleneck but could be worked around since Claude Code was pretty good at generating plugins to create and clean up tokens (variables), as well as components and their props. Thankfully, that gap didn't hang around for long enough, and now there's native support for writing directly to canvas. Firstly, we'll look at how we can set up the correct tooling for the following use case: You've joined a startup, they have a website or a web page, but lack any reusable design system
Discussion
Sign in to join the discussion
No comments yet — be the first to share your thoughts!