Attorney General Pam Bondi pushed out
Attorney General Pam Bondi is leaving the Department of Justice, President Trump announced on Truth Social Thursday. The big picture: Bondi led the unsuccessful attempts to prosecute Trump's political foes and oversaw releasing files about deceased sex offender Jeffrey Epstein , which has been a political liability for the president. Driving the news: "We love Pam, and she will be transitioning to a much needed and important new job in the private sector, to be announced at a date in the near future," the president posted on Truth Social , "and our Deputy Attorney General, and a very talented and respected Legal Mind, Todd Blanche, will step in to serve as Acting Attorney General." Context: The Justice Department has historically operated independently from presidents, but Trump very publi
Could not retrieve the full article text.
Read on Axios Tech →Sign in to highlight and annotate this article
Conversation starters
Daily AI Digest
Get the top 5 AI stories delivered to your inbox every morning.
More about
releaseannounceupdate
Building the Memory Layer for a Voice AI Agent
Photo by Enchanted Tools on Unsplash Voice AI raises the bar for responsiveness completely. In a chatbot, a two or three second delay feels acceptable. In voice, that same delay feels strange. People start wondering if the app heard them, whether the microphone failed, or if they should repeat themselves. Voice is much less forgiving. That was the main thing I kept running into while experimenting with a voice journal app: a voice-first app powered by Sarvam AI for speech to text and text to speech conversion and Redis Agent Memory Server for memory. It’s a pretty straight forward app. A user speaks, the app transcribes the audio, decides whether the user wants to save something or ask something, fetches the right context, and then responds back in voice. What makes it interesting is build
Knowledge Map
Connected Articles — Knowledge Graph
This article is connected to other articles through shared AI topics and tags.
More in Releases
Seedance 2.0 vs Sora 2: I Tested Both with Identical Prompts — Here's the Full Breakdown
When I started building with AI video APIs, the first question was obvious: which model should I default to? Spec comparisons didn’t help much. So I ran the same prompts through both Seedance 2.0 and Sora 2 and compared what actually came out. Three tests, three different failure modes: Physics realism — destruction and particle dynamics Fast motion + hard lighting — complex human movement under challenging conditions Character + emotion — subtle facial transitions All tests used identical prompts. Both models accessed through EvoLink’s unified API . Test Setup Variable Setup Prompting The same prompt for both models in each test Goal Compare output behavior, not marketing claims Focus areas Physics, motion coherence, lighting, facial detail, and audio behavior Reading rule We judge what a
Discussion
Sign in to join the discussion
No comments yet — be the first to share your thoughts!