Live
Black Hat USAAI BusinessBlack Hat AsiaAI BusinessArm works with IBM to deliver flexibility on mainframe - Computer WeeklyGNews AI IBMI Couldn’t Debug My AI/ML GPU Incident - So I Built My Own ToolDEV CommunityPoisoned pixels, phishing, prompt injection: Cybersecurity threats in AI-driven radiology - healthcare-in-europe.comGNews AI healthcarePublic remains cautious about AI in healthcare - Healthcare TodayGNews AI healthcareIBM and Arm target AI systems that preserve mission-critical computing - Stock TitanGNews AI IBMI built Skill Flow — manage and deploy AI coding skills across every major agentDEV CommunityBuilding a Simple AI Video Tool After Veo 3.1 Lite APIs Became AvailableDEV CommunityI wrote the first book on building production MCP servers with GoDEV CommunityHow I Built a Playwright Pytest Automation Framework with an AI AssistantDEV Community3 Classifiers, 3 Answers: Why CoT Faithfulness Scores Are MeaninglessDEV CommunityWalletConnect + AI Agents: Mobile Approval for Autonomous TransactionsDEV CommunityIntelligence Dissolves PrivacyLessWrong AIBlack Hat USAAI BusinessBlack Hat AsiaAI BusinessArm works with IBM to deliver flexibility on mainframe - Computer WeeklyGNews AI IBMI Couldn’t Debug My AI/ML GPU Incident - So I Built My Own ToolDEV CommunityPoisoned pixels, phishing, prompt injection: Cybersecurity threats in AI-driven radiology - healthcare-in-europe.comGNews AI healthcarePublic remains cautious about AI in healthcare - Healthcare TodayGNews AI healthcareIBM and Arm target AI systems that preserve mission-critical computing - Stock TitanGNews AI IBMI built Skill Flow — manage and deploy AI coding skills across every major agentDEV CommunityBuilding a Simple AI Video Tool After Veo 3.1 Lite APIs Became AvailableDEV CommunityI wrote the first book on building production MCP servers with GoDEV CommunityHow I Built a Playwright Pytest Automation Framework with an AI AssistantDEV Community3 Classifiers, 3 Answers: Why CoT Faithfulness Scores Are MeaninglessDEV CommunityWalletConnect + AI Agents: Mobile Approval for Autonomous TransactionsDEV CommunityIntelligence Dissolves PrivacyLessWrong AI

MonitorBench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Chain-of-Thought Monitorability in Large Language Models

arXivMarch 31, 202610 min read0 views
Source Quiz

arXiv:2603.28590v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) can generate chains of thought (CoTs) that are not always causally responsible for their final outputs. When such a mismatch occurs, the CoT no longer faithfully reflects the decision-critical factors driving the model's behavior, leading to the reduced CoT monitorability problem. However, a comprehensive and fully open-source benchmark for studying CoT monitorability remains lacking. To address this gap, we propose MonitorBench, a systematic benchmark for evaluating CoT monitorability in LLMs. MonitorBench provides: — Han Wang, Yifan Sun, Brian Ko, Mann Talati, Jiawen Gong, Zimeng Li, Naicheng Yu, Xucheng Yu, Wei Shen, Vedant Jolly, Huan Zhang

Authors:Han Wang, Yifan Sun, Brian Ko, Mann Talati, Jiawen Gong, Zimeng Li, Naicheng Yu, Xucheng Yu, Wei Shen, Vedant Jolly, Huan Zhang

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Large language models (LLMs) can generate chains of thought (CoTs) that are not always causally responsible for their final outputs. When such a mismatch occurs, the CoT no longer faithfully reflects the decision-critical factors driving the model's behavior, leading to the reduced CoT monitorability problem. However, a comprehensive and fully open-source benchmark for studying CoT monitorability remains lacking. To address this gap, we propose MonitorBench, a systematic benchmark for evaluating CoT monitorability in LLMs. MonitorBench provides: (1) a diverse set of 1,514 test instances with carefully designed decision-critical factors across 19 tasks spanning 7 categories to characterize when CoTs can be used to monitor the factors driving LLM behavior; and (2) two stress-test settings to quantify the extent to which CoT monitorability can be degraded. Extensive experiments across multiple popular LLMs with varying capabilities show that CoT monitorability is higher when producing the final target response requires structural reasoning through the decision-critical factor. Closed-source LLMs generally show lower monitorability, and there exists a negative relationship between monitorability and model capability. Moreover, both open- and closed-source LLMs can intentionally reduce monitorability under stress-tests, with monitorability dropping by up to 30% in some tasks that do not require structural reasoning over the decision-critical factors. Beyond these empirical insights, MonitorBench provides a basis for further research on evaluating future LLMs, studying advanced stress-test monitorability techniques, and developing new monitoring approaches.

Comments: 57 pages

Subjects:

Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

Cite as: arXiv:2603.28590 [cs.AI]

(or arXiv:2603.28590v1 [cs.AI] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.28590

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Han Wang [view email] [v1] Mon, 30 Mar 2026 15:37:42 UTC (10,282 KB)

Was this article helpful?

Sign in to highlight and annotate this article

AI
Ask AI about this article
Powered by AI News Hub · full article context loaded
Ready

Conversation starters

Ask anything about this article…

Daily AI Digest

Get the top 5 AI stories delivered to your inbox every morning.

More about

researchpaperarxiv

Knowledge Map

Knowledge Map
TopicsEntitiesSource
MonitorBenc…researchpaperarxivaiartificial-…arXiv

Connected Articles — Knowledge Graph

This article is connected to other articles through shared AI topics and tags.

Knowledge Graph100 articles · 124 connections
Scroll to zoom · drag to pan · click to open

Discussion

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet — be the first to share your thoughts!

More in Research Papers

오라클, 전 세계 최대 3만 명 감원…기업 지원·제품 로드맵 차질 우려
Research PapersFresh

오라클, 전 세계 최대 3만 명 감원…기업 지원·제품 로드맵 차질 우려

오라클이 대규모 감원에 착수했다. 이번 구조조정은 오라클 역사상 최대 규모의 인력 감축이 될 가능성이 있다. 미국, 인도, 캐나다, 멕시코, 우루과이의 직원들은 현지 시간 기준 31일 오전 6시경 ‘오라클 리더십(Oracle Leadership)’ 명의의 해고 통보 이메일을 받았으며, 인사부나 직속 상사로부터 사전 안내는 없었다. 슬랙, 줌, VPN, 출입 배지 등 기업 시스템 접근 권한도 거의 동시에 차단됐다. 오라클은 영향을 받은 직원들에게 조직 개편과 운영 효율화를 위한 조치라고 설명했다. 컨설팅 기업 그레이하운드 리서치(Greyhound Research)의 수석 애널리스트 산치트 비르 고지아는 오라클 ERP, 오라클 클라우드 인프라(OCI), 넷스위트(NetSuite)를 운영하는 CIO들에게 가장 시급한 우려로 운영 안정성 저하를 지목했다. 그는 “조용히 누적되는 불균형, 지연되는 에스컬레이션 대응, 축소된 백엔드 전문성, 증가하는 팀 간 인수인계, 표준 운영 절차를 벗어난 사고 발생 시 신뢰 저하가 나타날 수 있다”고 분석했다. 이어 “기업 고객은 단순히 코드 개발 속도만을 구매하는 것이 아니라 지원의 연속성, 릴리스 규율, 품질 보증, 통합 안정성, 문제 발생 시 책임성을 함께 고려한다”고 설명했다. 또한 CIO들에게 오라클 계정 팀을 상대로 전담 지원 인력의 지속적인 제공 여부, 최근 60~90일 동안 변경된 제품 조직에 대한 명확성, 향후 두 분기 동안의 릴리스 이행 여부를 확인할 것을 권고했다. 그는 “답변이 모호하다면 그 자체가 하나의 신호”라고 언급했다. 감원 규모와 대상 조직 온라인 직장