Lipschitz verification of neural networks through training
arXiv:2603.28113v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The global Lipschitz constant of a neural network governs both adversarial robustness and generalization. Conventional approaches to ``certified training" typically follow a train-then-verify paradigm: they train a network and then attempt to bound its Lipschitz constant. Because the efficient ``trivial bound" (the product of the layerwise Lipschitz constants) is exponentially loose for arbitrary networks, these approaches must rely on computationally expensive techniques such as semidefinite programming, mixed-integer programming, or branch-and- — Simon Kuang, Yuezhu Xu, S. Sivaranjani, Xinfan Lin
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:The global Lipschitz constant of a neural network governs both adversarial robustness and generalization. Conventional approaches to
trivial bound" (the product of the layerwise Lipschitz constants) is exponentially loose for arbitrary networks, these approaches must rely on computationally expensive techniques such as semidefinite programming, mixed-integer programming, or branch-and-bound. We propose a different paradigm: rather than designing complex verifiers for arbitrary networks, we design networks to be verifiable by the fast trivial bound. We show that directly penalizing the trivial bound during training forces it to become tight, thereby effectively regularizing the true Lipschitz constant. To achieve this, we identify three structural obstructions to a tight trivial bound (dead neurons, bias terms, and ill-conditioned weights) and introduce architectural mitigations, including a novel notion of norm-saturating polyactivations and bias-free sinusoidal layers. Our approach avoids the runtime complexity of advanced verification while achieving strong results: we train robust networks on MNIST with Lipschitz bounds that are small (orders of magnitude lower than comparable works) and tight (within 10% of the ground truth). The experimental results validate the theoretical guarantees, support the proposed mechanisms, and extend empirically to diverse activations and non-Euclidean norms.certified training" typically follow a train-then-verify paradigm: they train a network and then attempt to bound its Lipschitz constant. Because the efficientcertified training" typically follow a train-then-verify paradigm: they train a network and then attempt to bound its Lipschitz constant. Because the efficient
Subjects:
Machine Learning (cs.LG)
Cite as: arXiv:2603.28113 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2603.28113v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.28113
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
Submission history
From: Simon Kuang [view email] [v1] Mon, 30 Mar 2026 07:20:50 UTC (1,849 KB)
Sign in to highlight and annotate this article

Conversation starters
Daily AI Digest
Get the top 5 AI stories delivered to your inbox every morning.
More about
researchpaperarxiv
Google launches Gemma 4: four open-weight models from smartphones to workstations
Built from the same research as Gemini 3, the new family spans a 2B edge model that runs on a Raspberry Pi to a 31B dense model currently ranked third on the Arena AI open-model leaderboard. The Apache 2.0 licence is a significant shift from previous Gemma releases. Google has released Gemma 4, the latest [ ] This story continues at The Next Web
Knowledge Map
Connected Articles — Knowledge Graph
This article is connected to other articles through shared AI topics and tags.







Discussion
Sign in to join the discussion
No comments yet — be the first to share your thoughts!