ViviDoc: Generating Interactive Documents through Human-Agent Collaboration
arXiv:2603.27991v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Interactive documents help readers engage with complex ideas through dynamic visualization, interactive animations, and exploratory interfaces. However, creating such documents remains costly, as it requires both domain expertise and web development skills. Recent Large Language Model (LLM)-based agents can automate content creation, but directly applying them to interactive document generation often produces outputs that are difficult to control. To address this, we present ViviDoc, to the best of our knowledge the first work to systematically — Yinghao Tang, Yupeng Xie, Yingchaojie Feng, Tingfeng Lan, Jiale Lao, Yue Cheng, Wei Chen
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Interactive documents help readers engage with complex ideas through dynamic visualization, interactive animations, and exploratory interfaces. However, creating such documents remains costly, as it requires both domain expertise and web development skills. Recent Large Language Model (LLM)-based agents can automate content creation, but directly applying them to interactive document generation often produces outputs that are difficult to control. To address this, we present ViviDoc, to the best of our knowledge the first work to systematically address interactive document generation. ViviDoc introduces a multi-agent pipeline (Planner, Styler, Executor, Evaluator). To make the generation process controllable, we provide three levels of human control: (1) the Document Specification (DocSpec) with SRTC Interaction Specifications (State, Render, Transition, Constraint) for structured planning, (2) a content-aware Style Palette for customizing writing and interaction styles, and (3) chat-based editing for iterative refinement. We also construct ViviBench, a benchmark of 101 topics derived from real-world interactive documents across 11 domains, along with a taxonomy of 8 interaction types and a 4-dimensional automated evaluation framework validated against human ratings (Pearson r > 0.84). Experiments show that ViviDoc achieves the highest content richness and interaction quality in both automated and human evaluation. A 12-person user study confirms that the system is easy to use, provides effective control over the generation process, and produces documents that satisfy users.
Subjects:
Human-Computer Interaction (cs.HC); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
Cite as: arXiv:2603.27991 [cs.HC]
(or arXiv:2603.27991v1 [cs.HC] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.27991
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
Submission history
From: Yinghao Tang [view email] [v1] Mon, 30 Mar 2026 03:29:32 UTC (4,517 KB)
Sign in to highlight and annotate this article
Conversation starters
Daily AI Digest
Get the top 5 AI stories delivered to your inbox every morning.
![How Customers Are Using AI Search [2025 Research] - Bain & Company](https://d2xsxph8kpxj0f.cloudfront.net/310419663032563854/konzwo8nGf8Z4uZsMefwMr/default-img-robot-hand-JvPW6jsLFTCtkgtb97Kys5.webp)
Knowledge Map
Connected Articles — Knowledge Graph
This article is connected to other articles through shared AI topics and tags.
More in Research Papers
![[R] ICML Anonymized git repos for rebuttal](https://d2xsxph8kpxj0f.cloudfront.net/310419663032563854/konzwo8nGf8Z4uZsMefwMr/default-img-graph-nodes-a2pnJLpyKmDnxKWLd5BEAb.webp)
[R] ICML Anonymized git repos for rebuttal
A number of the papers I'm reviewing for have submitted additional figures and code through anonymized git repos (e.g. https://anonymous.4open.science/ ) to help supplement their rebuttal. Is this against any policy? I'm considering submitting additional graphs during the discussion phase for clarity, and would like to make sure that won't cause any issues submitted by /u/drahcirenoob [link] [comments]
![[D] Is research in semantic segmentation saturated?](https://d2xsxph8kpxj0f.cloudfront.net/310419663032563854/konzwo8nGf8Z4uZsMefwMr/default-img-microchip-RD7Ub6Tkp8JwbZxSThJdV5.webp)
[D] Is research in semantic segmentation saturated?
Nowadays I dont see a lot of papers addressing 2D semantic segmentation problem statements be it supervised, semi-supervised, domain adaptation. Is the problem statement saturated? Are there any promising research directions in segmentation except open-set segmentation? submitted by /u/Hot_Version_6403 [link] [comments]
Discussion
Sign in to join the discussion
No comments yet — be the first to share your thoughts!