A 9-Million-Parameter LLM That Fits in 130 Lines of Code - Startup Fortune
A 9-Million-Parameter LLM That Fits in 130 Lines of Code Startup Fortune
Could not retrieve the full article text.
Read on Google News: LLM →Sign in to highlight and annotate this article
Conversation starters
Daily AI Digest
Get the top 5 AI stories delivered to your inbox every morning.
More about
startupmillion
Our Email Provider Banned Us Overnight -- Here's What We Learned
April 6, 2026 | 8 min read We woke up on a Tuesday morning to find that every single email our products sent -- password resets, welcome messages, subscription confirmations, grading notifications -- was bouncing. Not some of them. All of them. Our email provider had permanently disabled our account overnight, with no warning and no appeal process. Just a single-line notification: "Your account has been suspended due to policy violations." We are a small group of friends from Tennessee building SaaS products under our company, Obsidian Clad Labs. We run five live products, and every one of them depends on transactional email to function. This was not an inconvenience. It was a full-blown emergency. Here is what happened, what we did wrong, and what we learned so you do not make the same mi
How We Run 5 Live SaaS Products on $35/Month in Infrastructure
April 5, 2026 | 9 min read When people hear that we run five live SaaS products -- each with its own frontend, backend API, database, and custom domain -- they assume we are spending hundreds of dollars a month on infrastructure. The reality is closer to $35. Sometimes less, depending on the month. We are Obsidian Clad Labs, a small group of friends from Tennessee who build software products. We are bootstrapped, which means every dollar matters. We cannot afford to spend $50 per service just because that is the default starting plan. So we got creative with how we architect, deploy, and operate our products. Here is the full breakdown. The Architecture Pattern Every one of our products follows the same basic structure: a Next.js frontend deployed to a static hosting provider with a genero
OpenAI’s $1M API Credits, Holos’ Agentic Web, and Xpertbench’s Expert Tasks
OpenAI’s $1M API Credits, Holos’ Agentic Web, and Xpertbench’s Expert Tasks AI is accelerating: OpenAI expands funding, Holos reimagines multi-agent systems, and Xpertbench pushes evaluation boundaries. Developers and startups are watching closely as tools for building, testing, and deploying AI evolve rapidly. OpenAI to give up to $100k and up to $1M in API credits What happened: OpenAI is offering up to $100k in cash and $1M in API credits to support startups and researchers. Why it matters: This lowers barriers for developers to experiment with OpenAI’s models, accelerating innovation in AI applications. Context: The move aligns with OpenAI’s push to foster ecosystem growth while balancing commercial and open-source interests. Holos: A Web-Scale LLM-Based Multi-Agent System for the Agen
Knowledge Map
Connected Articles — Knowledge Graph
This article is connected to other articles through shared AI topics and tags.
More in Models
Semantic matching in graph space without matrix computation and hallucinations and no GPU
Hello AI community,For the past few months, I’ve been rethinking how AI should process language and logic. Instead of relying on heavy matrix multiplications (Attention mechanisms) to statistically guess the next word inside an unexplainable black box, I asked a different question: What if concepts existed in a physical, multi-dimensional graph space where logic is visually traceable?I am excited to share our experimental architecture. To be absolutely clear: this is not a GraphRAG system built on top of an existing LLM. This is a standalone Native Graph Cognitive Engine.The Core Philosophy:Zero-Black-Box (Total Explainability): Modern LLMs are black boxes; you never truly know why they chose a specific token. Our engine is a “glass brain.” Every logical leap and every generated sentence i
b8679
llama-bench: add -fitc and -fitt to arguments ( #21304 ) llama-bench: add -fitc and -fitt to arguments update README.md address review comments update compare-llama-bench.py macOS/iOS: macOS Apple Silicon (arm64) macOS Intel (x64) iOS XCFramework Linux: Ubuntu x64 (CPU) Ubuntu arm64 (CPU) Ubuntu s390x (CPU) Ubuntu x64 (Vulkan) Ubuntu arm64 (Vulkan) Ubuntu x64 (ROCm 7.2) Ubuntu x64 (OpenVINO) Windows: Windows x64 (CPU) Windows arm64 (CPU) Windows x64 (CUDA 12) - CUDA 12.4 DLLs Windows x64 (CUDA 13) - CUDA 13.1 DLLs Windows x64 (Vulkan) Windows x64 (SYCL) Windows x64 (HIP) openEuler: openEuler x86 (310p) openEuler x86 (910b, ACL Graph) openEuler aarch64 (310p) openEuler aarch64 (910b, ACL Graph)
15 Datasets for Training and Evaluating AI Agents
Datasets for training and evaluating AI agents are the foundation of reliable agentic systems. Agents don’t magically work — they need structured data that teaches action-taking: tool calling, web interaction, and multi-step planning. Just as importantly, they need evaluation datasets that catch regressions before those failures hit production. This is where most teams struggle. A chat model can sound correct while failing at execution, like returning invalid JSON, calling the wrong API, clicking the wrong element, or generating code that doesn’t actually fix the issue. In agentic workflows, those small failures compound across steps, turning minor errors into broken pipelines. That’s why datasets for training and evaluating AI agents should be treated as infrastructure, not a one-time res
Discussion
Sign in to join the discussion
No comments yet — be the first to share your thoughts!