Live
Black Hat USAAI BusinessBlack Hat AsiaAI BusinessPerplexity launches Secure Intelligence Institute to advance AI security, privacy, and safety research - Moneycontrol.comGoogle News: AI SafetyAnthropic Source Code Leak Exposes AI Security Logic Before $350B IPO - startupfortune.comGoogle News: ClaudeBoy, 16, takes his own life after chilling ChatGPT question and 'farewell' texts - Daily StarGoogle News: ChatGPTGiving up on EA after 13 yearsLessWrong AIThe End of the "I Am Not a Robot" Box: Why Your Next Login Will Require 5 SquatsDEV CommunityInstagram DMs to Amazon Connect ChatDEV CommunityThe Nines Are Lying to You: What 99.9% Uptime Actually CostsDEV CommunityThe jury verdicts against Meta and YouTube recognized some platform design features as defective, distinct from what Section 230 was created to protect (Casey Newton/Platformer)TechmemeAnthropic code leak sparks renewed concerns over AI security and operational risks - CXO DigitalpulseGoogle News: AI SafetyBefore You Upgrade Hardware, Fix the SoftwareDEV Community2026년, Postman 버릴 때? Axios npm 공격 후 안전한 API 테스트 및 마이그레이션DEV CommunityAnthropic accidentally leaks part of Claude Code source - Latest news from AzerbaijanGoogle News: ClaudeBlack Hat USAAI BusinessBlack Hat AsiaAI BusinessPerplexity launches Secure Intelligence Institute to advance AI security, privacy, and safety research - Moneycontrol.comGoogle News: AI SafetyAnthropic Source Code Leak Exposes AI Security Logic Before $350B IPO - startupfortune.comGoogle News: ClaudeBoy, 16, takes his own life after chilling ChatGPT question and 'farewell' texts - Daily StarGoogle News: ChatGPTGiving up on EA after 13 yearsLessWrong AIThe End of the "I Am Not a Robot" Box: Why Your Next Login Will Require 5 SquatsDEV CommunityInstagram DMs to Amazon Connect ChatDEV CommunityThe Nines Are Lying to You: What 99.9% Uptime Actually CostsDEV CommunityThe jury verdicts against Meta and YouTube recognized some platform design features as defective, distinct from what Section 230 was created to protect (Casey Newton/Platformer)TechmemeAnthropic code leak sparks renewed concerns over AI security and operational risks - CXO DigitalpulseGoogle News: AI SafetyBefore You Upgrade Hardware, Fix the SoftwareDEV Community2026년, Postman 버릴 때? Axios npm 공격 후 안전한 API 테스트 및 마이그레이션DEV CommunityAnthropic accidentally leaks part of Claude Code source - Latest news from AzerbaijanGoogle News: Claude

CDH-Bench: A Commonsense-Driven Hallucination Benchmark for Evaluating Visual Fidelity in Vision-Language Models

arXivMarch 31, 202610 min read0 views
Source Quiz

arXiv:2603.27982v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Vision-language models (VLMs) achieve strong performance on many benchmarks, yet a basic reliability question remains underexplored: when visual evidence conflicts with commonsense, do models follow what is shown or what commonsense suggests? A characteristic failure in this setting is that the model overrides visual evidence and outputs the commonsense alternative. We term this phenomenon \textbf{commonsense-driven hallucination} (CDH). To evaluate it, we introduce \textbf{CDH-Bench}, a benchmark designed to create explicit \textbf{visual evid — Kesheng Chen, Yamin Hu, Qi Zhou, Zhenqian Zhu, Wenjian Luo

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Vision-language models (VLMs) achieve strong performance on many benchmarks, yet a basic reliability question remains underexplored: when visual evidence conflicts with commonsense, do models follow what is shown or what commonsense suggests? A characteristic failure in this setting is that the model overrides visual evidence and outputs the commonsense alternative. We term this phenomenon \textbf{commonsense-driven hallucination} (CDH). To evaluate it, we introduce \textbf{CDH-Bench}, a benchmark designed to create explicit \textbf{visual evidence--commonsense conflicts}. CDH-Bench covers three dimensions: \textit{counting anomalies}, \textit{relational anomalies}, and \textit{attribute anomalies}. We evaluate frontier VLMs under \textit{binary Question Answering (QA)} and \textit{multiple-choice QA}, and report metrics including \textit{Counterfactual Accuracy} (CF-Acc), \textit{Commonsense Accuracy} (CS-Acc), \textit{Counterfactual Accuracy Drop} (CFAD), \textit{Commonsense Collapse Rate} (CCR), and \textit{Relative Prior Dependency} (RPD). Results show that even strong models remain vulnerable to prior-driven normalization under visual evidence--commonsense conflict. CDH-Bench provides a controlled diagnostic of visual fidelity under visual evidence--commonsense conflict.

Subjects:

Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computation and Language (cs.CL)

Cite as: arXiv:2603.27982 [cs.CV]

(or arXiv:2603.27982v1 [cs.CV] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.27982

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Kesheng Chen [view email] [v1] Mon, 30 Mar 2026 03:04:53 UTC (18,674 KB)

Was this article helpful?

Sign in to highlight and annotate this article

AI
Ask AI about this article
Powered by AI News Hub · full article context loaded
Ready

Conversation starters

Ask anything about this article…

Daily AI Digest

Get the top 5 AI stories delivered to your inbox every morning.

More about

researchpaperarxiv

Knowledge Map

Knowledge Map
TopicsEntitiesSource
CDH-Bench: …researchpaperarxivaiartificial-…arXiv

Connected Articles — Knowledge Graph

This article is connected to other articles through shared AI topics and tags.

Knowledge Graph100 articles · 228 connections
Scroll to zoom · drag to pan · click to open

Discussion

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet — be the first to share your thoughts!

More in Research Papers