The Geometric Cost of Normalization: Affine Bounds on the Bayesian Complexity of Neural Networks
arXiv:2603.27432v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: LayerNorm and RMSNorm impose fundamentally different geometric constraints on their outputs - and this difference has a precise, quantifiable consequence for model complexity. We prove that LayerNorm's mean-centering step, by confining data to a linear hyperplane (through the origin), reduces the Local Learning Coefficient (LLC) of the subsequent weight matrix by exactly $m/2$ (where $m$ is its output dimension); RMSNorm's projection onto a sphere preserves the LLC entirely. This reduction is structurally guaranteed before any training begins, de — Sungbae Chun
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:LayerNorm and RMSNorm impose fundamentally different geometric constraints on their outputs - and this difference has a precise, quantifiable consequence for model complexity. We prove that LayerNorm's mean-centering step, by confining data to a linear hyperplane (through the origin), reduces the Local Learning Coefficient (LLC) of the subsequent weight matrix by exactly $m/2$ (where $m$ is its output dimension); RMSNorm's projection onto a sphere preserves the LLC entirely. This reduction is structurally guaranteed before any training begins, determined by data manifold geometry alone. The underlying condition is a geometric threshold: for the codimension-one manifolds we study, the LLC drop is binary -- any non-zero curvature, regardless of sign or magnitude, is sufficient to preserve the LLC, while only affinely flat manifolds cause the drop. At finite sample sizes this threshold acquires a smooth crossover whose width depends on how much of the data distribution actually experiences the curvature, not merely on whether curvature exists somewhere. We verify both predictions experimentally with controlled single-layer scaling experiments using the wrLLC framework. We further show that Softmax simplex data introduces a "smuggled bias" that activates the same $m/2$ LLC drop when paired with an explicit downstream bias, proved via the affine symmetry extension of the main theorem and confirmed empirically.
Comments: 12 pages, 2 figures
Subjects:
Machine Learning (cs.LG); Information Theory (cs.IT)
Cite as: arXiv:2603.27432 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2603.27432v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.27432
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
Submission history
From: Sungbae Chun [view email] [v1] Sat, 28 Mar 2026 22:15:45 UTC (46 KB)
Sign in to highlight and annotate this article

Conversation starters
Daily AI Digest
Get the top 5 AI stories delivered to your inbox every morning.
More about
researchpaperarxiv
AI Regulation Insights
As Canada s trusted partner in AI advancement, Vector Institute continues to bridge cutting-edge research with practical industry applications through strategic initiatives. In response to the rapidly evolving AI regulatory landscape, [ ] The post AI Regulation Insights appeared first on Vector Institute for Artificial Intelligence .
Knowledge Map
Connected Articles — Knowledge Graph
This article is connected to other articles through shared AI topics and tags.
More in Research Papers

Quantum computers might crack today's encryption far sooner than we thought
According to a study by engineers at Caltech and the UC Department of Physics, quantum computers do not need to be nearly as powerful as previously believed to crack the most advanced cryptographic technologies. The research claims that Shor's algorithm could break RSA public-key encryption using quantum computers with just... Read Entire Article






Discussion
Sign in to join the discussion
No comments yet — be the first to share your thoughts!