Amalgam: Hybrid LLM-PGM Synthesis Algorithm for Accuracy and Realism
arXiv:2603.27254v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: To generate synthetic datasets, e.g., in domains such as healthcare, the literature proposes approaches of two main types: Probabilistic Graphical Models (PGMs) and Deep Learning models, such as LLMs. While PGMs produce synthetic data that can be used for advanced analytics, they do not support complex schemas and datasets. LLMs on the other hand, support complex schemas but produce skewed dataset distributions, which are less useful for advanced analytics. In this paper, we therefore present Amalgam, a hybrid LLM-PGM data synthesis algorithm s — Antheas Kapenekakis, Bent Thomsen, Katja Hose, Michele Albano
View PDF
Abstract:To generate synthetic datasets, e.g., in domains such as healthcare, the literature proposes approaches of two main types: Probabilistic Graphical Models (PGMs) and Deep Learning models, such as LLMs. While PGMs produce synthetic data that can be used for advanced analytics, they do not support complex schemas and datasets. LLMs on the other hand, support complex schemas but produce skewed dataset distributions, which are less useful for advanced analytics. In this paper, we therefore present Amalgam, a hybrid LLM-PGM data synthesis algorithm supporting both advanced analytics, realism, and tangible privacy properties. We show that Amalgam synthesizes data with an average 91 % $\chi^2 P$ value and scores 3.8/5 for realism using our proposed metric, where state-of-the-art is 3.3 and real data is 4.7.
Subjects:
Databases (cs.DB); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
Cite as: arXiv:2603.27254 [cs.DB]
(or arXiv:2603.27254v1 [cs.DB] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.27254
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
Submission history
From: Antheas Kapenekakis [view email] [v1] Sat, 28 Mar 2026 12:10:46 UTC (202 KB)
Sign in to highlight and annotate this article
Conversation starters
Daily AI Digest
Get the top 5 AI stories delivered to your inbox every morning.
More about
researchpaperarxiv
Unnoticed Gemma-4 Feature - it admits that it does not now...
Edit: "it admits that it does not know" (sorry for the TYPO!) Although Qwen3.5 is a great series of models, it is prone to make very broad assumptions/hallucinate stuff and it does it with a great confidence, so you may believe what it says. In contrast, Gemma-4 (specifically I tested E4b Q8 version) admits that it does not know right at the start of conversation: Therefore, I cannot confirm familiarity with a single, specific research study by that name. However, I am generally familiar with the factors that researchers and military trainers study regarding attrition in elite training programs... That is very important feature and it may hint to changing model training routine, where admitting to not know stuff is penalized less than trying to guess and then fail. submitted by /u/mtomas7
NevaMind AI: Advanced Memory for Proactive Agents
Unveiling memU: A Sophisticated Memory Solution for 24/7 Proactive AI Agents NevaMind AI is thrilled to introduce memU , an open-source project dedicated to providing advanced memory functionalities for AI agents operating around the clock. Designed with the demands of proactive systems in mind, such as the principles behind Moltbot (ClawDBot), memU aims to be a cornerstone for developing more intelligent and responsive AI. Why memU? In the rapidly evolving landscape of Artificial Intelligence, robust memory management is paramount for agents that need to perform complex tasks, maintain context over long interactions, and learn continuously. memU addresses this critical need by offering: 24/7 Proactive Operation : Ensures agents are always ready, minimizing latency and maximizing efficienc
Knowledge Map
Connected Articles — Knowledge Graph
This article is connected to other articles through shared AI topics and tags.
More in Research Papers
Academic Proof-of-Work in the Age of LLMs
Written quickly as part of the Inkhaven Residency . Related: Bureaucracy as active ingredient , pain as active ingredient A widely known secret in academia is that many of the formalities serve in large part proof of work . That is, the reason expensive procedures exist is that some way of filtering must exist, and the amount of effort invested can often be a good proxy for the quality of the work. Specifically, the pool of research is vast, and good research can often be hard to identify. Even engaging in research enough to understand its quality can be expensive. As a result, people look toward signs of visible, expensive effort in order to determine whether to engage in the research at all. Why do people insist only on reading research that’s published in well-formatted, well-written pa
Signals – finding the most informative agent traces without LLM judges (arxiv.org)
Hello Peeps Salman, Shuguang and Adil here from Katanemo Labs (a DigitalOcean company). Wanted to introduce our latest research on agentic systems called Signals. If you've been building agents, you've probably noticed that there are far too many agent traces/trajectories to review one by one, and using humans or extra LLM calls to inspect all of them gets expensive really fast. The paper proposes a lightweight way to compute structured “signals” from live agent interactions so you can surface the trajectories most worth looking at, without changing the agent’s online behavior. Computing Signals doesn't require a GPU. Signals are grouped into a simple taxonomy across interaction, execution, and environment patterns, including things like misalignment, stagnation, disengagement, failure, lo
![[R] Looking for arXiv cs.LG endorser, inference monitoring using information geometry](https://d2xsxph8kpxj0f.cloudfront.net/310419663032563854/konzwo8nGf8Z4uZsMefwMr/default-img-earth-satellite-QfbitDhCB2KjTsjtXRYcf9.webp)
[R] Looking for arXiv cs.LG endorser, inference monitoring using information geometry
Hi r/MachineLearning , I’m looking for an arXiv endorser in cs.LG for a paper on inference-time distribution shift detection for deployed LLMs. The core idea: instead of monitoring input embeddings (which is what existing tools do), we monitor the statistical manifold of the model’s output distributions using Fisher-Rao geodesic distance. We then run adaptive CUSUM (Page-Hinkley) on the resulting z-score stream to catch slow drift that per-request spike detection misses entirely. The methodology is grounded in published work on information geometry (Figshare, DOIs available). We’ve validated the signal on real OpenAI API logprobs, CUSUM caught gradual domain drift in 7 steps with zero false alarms during warmup, while spike detection missed it entirely. If anyone with cs.LG endorsement is
Discussion
Sign in to join the discussion
No comments yet — be the first to share your thoughts!