Live
🔥 google-research/timesfmGitHub Trending🔥 aliasrobotics/caiGitHub Trending🔥 ComposioHQ/awesome-claude-skillsGitHub Trending🔥 SkyworkAI/Matrix-GameGitHub Trending🔥 sponsors/vas3kGitHub Trending🔥 sponsors/khoj-aiGitHub Trending🔥 PaddlePaddle/PaddleOCRGitHub TrendingTest: 15% of Americans say they would work for AI bossTechCrunch AIAutoMS: Multi-Agent Evolutionary Search for Cross-Physics Inverse Microstructure DesignarXivMultiverse: Language-Conditioned Multi-Game Level Blending via Shared RepresentationarXivMediHive: A Decentralized Agent Collective for Medical ReasoningarXivBitboard version of Tetris AIarXivThe Price of Meaning: Why Every Semantic Memory System ForgetsarXivWhen Verification Hurts: Asymmetric Effects of Multi-Agent Feedback in Logic Proof TutoringarXivQuantification of Credal Uncertainty: A Distance-Based ApproacharXiv🔥 google-research/timesfmGitHub Trending🔥 aliasrobotics/caiGitHub Trending🔥 ComposioHQ/awesome-claude-skillsGitHub Trending🔥 SkyworkAI/Matrix-GameGitHub Trending🔥 sponsors/vas3kGitHub Trending🔥 sponsors/khoj-aiGitHub Trending🔥 PaddlePaddle/PaddleOCRGitHub TrendingTest: 15% of Americans say they would work for AI bossTechCrunch AIAutoMS: Multi-Agent Evolutionary Search for Cross-Physics Inverse Microstructure DesignarXivMultiverse: Language-Conditioned Multi-Game Level Blending via Shared RepresentationarXivMediHive: A Decentralized Agent Collective for Medical ReasoningarXivBitboard version of Tetris AIarXivThe Price of Meaning: Why Every Semantic Memory System ForgetsarXivWhen Verification Hurts: Asymmetric Effects of Multi-Agent Feedback in Logic Proof TutoringarXivQuantification of Credal Uncertainty: A Distance-Based ApproacharXiv

AutoMS: Multi-Agent Evolutionary Search for Cross-Physics Inverse Microstructure Design

arXivby [Submitted on 28 Mar 2026]March 31, 20262 min read3 views
Source Quiz

arXiv:2603.27195v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Designing microstructures that satisfy coupled cross-physics objectives is a fundamental challenge in material science. This inverse design problem involves a vast, discontinuous search space where traditional topology optimization is computationally prohibitive, and deep generative models often suffer from "physical hallucinations," lacking the capability to ensure rigorous validity. To address this limitation, we introduce AutoMS, a multi-agent neuro-symbolic framework that reformulates inverse design as an LLM-driven evolutionary search. Unlik — Zhenyuan Zhao, Yu Xing, Tianyang Xue, Lingxin Cao, Xin Yan, Lin Lu

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Designing microstructures that satisfy coupled cross-physics objectives is a fundamental challenge in material science. This inverse design problem involves a vast, discontinuous search space where traditional topology optimization is computationally prohibitive, and deep generative models often suffer from "physical hallucinations," lacking the capability to ensure rigorous validity. To address this limitation, we introduce AutoMS, a multi-agent neuro-symbolic framework that reformulates inverse design as an LLM-driven evolutionary search. Unlike methods that treat LLMs merely as interfaces, AutoMS integrates them as "semantic navigators" to initialize search spaces and break local optima, while our novel Simulation-Aware Evolutionary Search (SAES) addresses the "blindness" of traditional evolutionary strategies. Specifically, SAES utilizes simulation feedback to perform local gradient approximation and directed parameter updates, effectively guiding the search toward physically valid Pareto frontiers. Orchestrating specialized agents (Manager, Parser, Generator, and Simulator), AutoMS achieves a state-of-the-art 83.8% success rate on 17 diverse cross-physics tasks, nearly doubling the performance of traditional NSGA-II (43.7%) and significantly outperforming ReAct-based LLM baselines (53.3%). Furthermore, our hierarchical architecture reduces total execution time by 23.3%. AutoMS demonstrates that autonomous agent systems can effectively navigate complex physical landscapes, bridging the gap between semantic design intent and rigorous physical validity.

Subjects:

Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

Cite as: arXiv:2603.27195 [cs.AI]

(or arXiv:2603.27195v1 [cs.AI] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.27195

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Yu Xing [view email] [v1] Sat, 28 Mar 2026 08:51:33 UTC (3,390 KB)

Original source

arXiv

Was this article helpful?

Sign in to highlight and annotate this article

AI
Ask AI about this article
Powered by AI News Hub · full article context loaded
Ready

Conversation starters

Ask anything about this article…

Daily AI Digest

Get the top 5 AI stories delivered to your inbox every morning.

Knowledge Map

Knowledge Map
TopicsEntitiesSource
AutoMS: Mul…researchpaperarxivaiartificial-…arXiv

Connected Articles — Knowledge Graph

This article is connected to other articles through shared AI topics and tags.

Knowledge Graph100 articles · 336 connections
Scroll to zoom · drag to pan · click to open

Discussion

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet — be the first to share your thoughts!

More in Research Papers