A large corpus of lucid and non-lucid dream reports
arXiv:2603.26992v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: All varieties of dreaming remain a mystery. Lucid dreams in particular, or those characterized by awareness of the dream, are notoriously difficult to study. Their scarce prevalence and resistance to deliberate induction make it difficult to obtain a sizeable corpus of lucid dream reports. The consequent lack of clarity around lucid dream phenomenology has left the many purported applications of lucidity under-realized. Here, a large corpus of 55k dream reports from 5k contributors is curated, described, and validated for future research. Ten yea — Remington Mallett
View PDF
Abstract:All varieties of dreaming remain a mystery. Lucid dreams in particular, or those characterized by awareness of the dream, are notoriously difficult to study. Their scarce prevalence and resistance to deliberate induction make it difficult to obtain a sizeable corpus of lucid dream reports. The consequent lack of clarity around lucid dream phenomenology has left the many purported applications of lucidity under-realized. Here, a large corpus of 55k dream reports from 5k contributors is curated, described, and validated for future research. Ten years of publicly available dream reports were scraped from an online forum where users share anonymous dream journals. Importantly, users optionally categorize their dream as lucid, non-lucid, or a nightmare, offering a user-provided labeling system that includes 10k lucid and 25k non-lucid, and 2k nightmare labels. After characterizing the corpus with descriptive statistics and visualizations, construct validation shows that language patterns in lucid-labeled reports are consistent with known characteristics of lucid dreams. While the entire corpus has broad value for dream science, the labeled subset is particularly powerful for new discoveries in lucid dream studies.
Subjects:
Computation and Language (cs.CL)
Cite as: arXiv:2603.26992 [cs.CL]
(or arXiv:2603.26992v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.26992
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
Submission history
From: Remington Mallett [view email] [v1] Fri, 27 Mar 2026 21:03:43 UTC (353 KB)
Sign in to highlight and annotate this article
Conversation starters
Daily AI Digest
Get the top 5 AI stories delivered to your inbox every morning.
More about
researchpaperarxiv
Research across 1,372 participants and 9K+ trials details "cognitive surrender", where most subjects had minimal AI skepticism and accepted faulty AI reasoning (Kyle Orland/Ars Technica)
Kyle Orland / Ars Technica : Research across 1,372 participants and 9K+ trials details cognitive surrender , where most subjects had minimal AI skepticism and accepted faulty AI reasoning When it comes to large language model-powered tools, there are generally two broad categories of users.
Knowledge Map
Connected Articles — Knowledge Graph
This article is connected to other articles through shared AI topics and tags.
More in Research Papers
![[D] KDD Review Discussion](https://d2xsxph8kpxj0f.cloudfront.net/310419663032563854/konzwo8nGf8Z4uZsMefwMr/default-img-wave-pattern-4YWNKzoeu65vYpqRKWMiWf.webp)
[D] KDD Review Discussion
KDD 2026 (Feb Cycle) reviews will release today (4-April AoE), This thread is open to discuss about reviews and importantly celebrate successful reviews. Let us all remember that review system is noisy and we all suffer from it and this doesn't define our research impact. Let's all prioritise reviews which enhance our papers. Feel free to discuss your experiences submitted by /u/BomsDrag [link] [comments]
The CEO Building the Most Powerful AI on Earth Just Admitted It Will Destroy Half Your Industry.
January 26, 2026. Dario Amodei published a 20,000-word essay warning that AI will displace 50% of entry-level white-collar jobs in 1–5… Continue reading on Towards AI »
Discussion
Sign in to join the discussion
No comments yet — be the first to share your thoughts!