SparseCam4D: Spatio-Temporally Consistent 4D Reconstruction from Sparse Cameras
arXiv:2603.26481v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: High-quality 4D reconstruction enables photorealistic and immersive rendering of the dynamic real world. However, unlike static scenes that can be fully captured with a single camera, high-quality dynamic scenes typically require dense arrays of tens or even hundreds of synchronized cameras. Dependence on such costly lab setups severely limits practical scalability. The reliance on such costly lab setups severely limits practical scalability. To this end, we propose a sparse-camera dynamic reconstruction framework that exploits abundant yet incon — Weihong Pan, Xiaoyu Zhang, Zhuang Zhang, Zhichao Ye, Nan Wang, Haomin Liu, Guofeng Zhang
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:High-quality 4D reconstruction enables photorealistic and immersive rendering of the dynamic real world. However, unlike static scenes that can be fully captured with a single camera, high-quality dynamic scenes typically require dense arrays of tens or even hundreds of synchronized cameras. Dependence on such costly lab setups severely limits practical scalability. The reliance on such costly lab setups severely limits practical scalability. To this end, we propose a sparse-camera dynamic reconstruction framework that exploits abundant yet inconsistent generative observations. Our key innovation is the Spatio-Temporal Distortion Field, which provides a unified mechanism for modeling inconsistencies in generative observations across both spatial and temporal dimensions. Building on this, we develop a complete pipeline that enables 4D reconstruction from sparse and uncalibrated camera inputs. We evaluate our method on multi-camera dynamic scene benchmarks, achieving spatio-temporally consistent high-fidelity renderings and significantly outperforming existing approaches.
Comments: CVPR 2026
Subjects:
Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV)
Cite as: arXiv:2603.26481 [cs.CV]
(or arXiv:2603.26481v1 [cs.CV] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.26481
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
Submission history
From: Xiaoyu Zhang [view email] [v1] Fri, 27 Mar 2026 14:44:52 UTC (47,780 KB)
Sign in to highlight and annotate this article

Conversation starters
Daily AI Digest
Get the top 5 AI stories delivered to your inbox every morning.
More about
researchpaperarxiv
Scaling Agentic Memory to 5 Billion Vectors via Binary Quantization and Dynamic Wavelet Matrices
In a study, a new “dynamic wavelet matrix” was used as a vector database, where the memory grows only with log(σ) instead of with n. I considered building a KNN model with a huge memory, capable of holding, for example, 5 billion vectors. First, the words in the context window are converted into an embedding using deberta-v3-small. This is a fast encoder that also takes the position of the tokens into account (disentangled attention) and is responsible for the context in the model. The embedding is then converted into a bit sequence using binary quantization, where dimensions greater than 0 are converted to 1 and otherwise to 0. The advantage is that bit sequences are compressible and are entered into the dynamic wavelet matrix, where the memory grows only with log(σ). A response token is
![[D] ICML reviewer making up false claim in acknowledgement, what to do?](https://d2xsxph8kpxj0f.cloudfront.net/310419663032563854/konzwo8nGf8Z4uZsMefwMr/default-img-matrix-rain-CvjLrWJiXfamUnvj5xT9J9.webp)
[D] ICML reviewer making up false claim in acknowledgement, what to do?
In a rebuttal acknowledgement we received, the reviewer made up a claim that our method performs worse than baselines with some hyperparameter settings. We did do a comprehensive list of hyperparameter comparisons and the reviewer's claim is not supported by what's presented in the paper. In this case what can we do? submitted by /u/dontknowwhattoplay [link] [comments]
Knowledge Map
Connected Articles — Knowledge Graph
This article is connected to other articles through shared AI topics and tags.
More in Research Papers
![[D] ICML reviewer making up false claim in acknowledgement, what to do?](https://d2xsxph8kpxj0f.cloudfront.net/310419663032563854/konzwo8nGf8Z4uZsMefwMr/default-img-matrix-rain-CvjLrWJiXfamUnvj5xT9J9.webp)
[D] ICML reviewer making up false claim in acknowledgement, what to do?
In a rebuttal acknowledgement we received, the reviewer made up a claim that our method performs worse than baselines with some hyperparameter settings. We did do a comprehensive list of hyperparameter comparisons and the reviewer's claim is not supported by what's presented in the paper. In this case what can we do? submitted by /u/dontknowwhattoplay [link] [comments]


Researchers 3D print robot the size of a single-cell organism — devices move and navigate even without a ‘brain,’ uses their shape and the environment to get going
Researchers 3D print robot the size of a single-cell organism — devices move and navigate even without a ‘brain,’ uses their shape and the environment to get going


Discussion
Sign in to join the discussion
No comments yet — be the first to share your thoughts!