Pioneering Perceptual Video Fluency Assessment: A Novel Task with Benchmark Dataset and Baseline
arXiv:2603.26055v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Accurately estimating humans' subjective feedback on video fluency, e.g., motion consistency and frame continuity, is crucial for various applications like streaming and gaming. Yet, it has long been overlooked, as prior arts have focused on solving it in the video quality assessment (VQA) task, merely as a sub-dimension of overall quality. In this work, we conduct pilot experiments and reveal that current VQA predictions largely underrepresent fluency, thereby limiting their applicability. To this end, we pioneer Video Fluency Assessment (VFA) a — Qizhi Xie, Kun Yuan, Yunpeng Qu, Ming Sun, Chao Zhou, Jihong Zhu
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Accurately estimating humans' subjective feedback on video fluency, e.g., motion consistency and frame continuity, is crucial for various applications like streaming and gaming. Yet, it has long been overlooked, as prior arts have focused on solving it in the video quality assessment (VQA) task, merely as a sub-dimension of overall quality. In this work, we conduct pilot experiments and reveal that current VQA predictions largely underrepresent fluency, thereby limiting their applicability. To this end, we pioneer Video Fluency Assessment (VFA) as a standalone perceptual task focused on the temporal dimension. To advance VFA research, 1) we construct a fluency-oriented dataset, FluVid, comprising 4,606 in-the-wild videos with balanced fluency distribution, featuring the first-ever scoring criteria and human study for VFA. 2) We develop a large-scale benchmark of 23 methods, the most comprehensive one thus far on FluVid, gathering insights for VFA-tailored model designs. 3) We propose a baseline model called FluNet, which deploys temporal permuted self-attention (T-PSA) to enrich input fluency information and enhance long-range inter-frame interactions. Our work not only achieves state-of-the-art performance but, more importantly, offers the community a roadmap to explore solutions for VFA.
Comments: 14 pages, 6 figures. Accepted by CVPR 2026 findings track
Subjects:
Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV)
Cite as: arXiv:2603.26055 [cs.CV]
(or arXiv:2603.26055v1 [cs.CV] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.26055
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
Submission history
From: Qizhi Xie [view email] [v1] Fri, 27 Mar 2026 03:47:41 UTC (9,684 KB)
Sign in to highlight and annotate this article
Conversation starters
Daily AI Digest
Get the top 5 AI stories delivered to your inbox every morning.
More about
researchpaperarxiv
Balancing Efficiency and Empathy: Healthcare Providers' Perspectives on AI-Supported Workflows for Serious Illness Conversations in the Emergency Department
arXiv:2506.00241v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Serious Illness Conversations (SICs), discussions about values and care preferences for patients with life-threatening illness, rarely occur in Emergency Departments (EDs), despite evidence that early conversations improve care alignment and reduce unnecessary interventions. We interviewed 11 ED providers to identify challenges in SICs and opportunities for technology support, with a focus on AI. Our analysis revealed a four-stage SIC workflow (identification, preparation, conduction, documentation) and barriers at each stage, including fragmented patient information, limited time and space, lack of conversational guidance, and burdensome documentation. Providers expressed interest in AI systems for synthesizing information, supporting re
Locating Risk: Task Designers and the Challenge of Risk Disclosure in RAI Content Work
arXiv:2505.24246v4 Announce Type: replace Abstract: As AI systems are increasingly tested and deployed in open-ended and high-stakes domains, crowdworkers are often tasked with responsible AI (RAI) content work. These tasks include labeling violent content, moderating disturbing text, or simulating harmful behavior for red teaming exercises to shape AI system behaviors. While prior research efforts have highlighted the risks to worker well-being associated with RAI content work, far less attention has been paid to how these risks are communicated to workers by task designers or individuals who design and post RAI tasks. Existing transparency frameworks and guidelines, such as model cards, datasheets, and crowdworksheets, focus on documenting model information and dataset collection process
FIRMED: A Peak-Centered Multimodal Dataset with Fine-Grained Annotation for Emotion Recognition
arXiv:2507.02350v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Traditional video-induced physiological datasets usually rely on whole-trial labels, which introduce temporal label noise in dynamic emotion recognition. We present FIRMED, a peak-centered multimodal dataset based on an immediate-recall annotation paradigm, with synchronized EEG, ECG, GSR, PPG, and facial recordings from 35 participants. FIRMED provides event-centered timestamps, emotion labels, and intensity annotations, and its annotation quality is supported by subjective and physiological validation. Benchmark experiments show that FIRMED consistently outperforms whole-trial labeling, yielding an average gain of 3.8 percentage points across eight EEG-based classifiers, with further improvements under multimodal fusion. FIRMED provides
Knowledge Map
Connected Articles — Knowledge Graph
This article is connected to other articles through shared AI topics and tags.
More in Research Papers
Locating Risk: Task Designers and the Challenge of Risk Disclosure in RAI Content Work
arXiv:2505.24246v4 Announce Type: replace Abstract: As AI systems are increasingly tested and deployed in open-ended and high-stakes domains, crowdworkers are often tasked with responsible AI (RAI) content work. These tasks include labeling violent content, moderating disturbing text, or simulating harmful behavior for red teaming exercises to shape AI system behaviors. While prior research efforts have highlighted the risks to worker well-being associated with RAI content work, far less attention has been paid to how these risks are communicated to workers by task designers or individuals who design and post RAI tasks. Existing transparency frameworks and guidelines, such as model cards, datasheets, and crowdworksheets, focus on documenting model information and dataset collection process
Togedule: Scheduling Meetings with Large Language Models and Adaptive Representations of Group Availability
arXiv:2505.01000v5 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Scheduling is a perennial-and often challenging-problem for many groups. Existing tools are mostly static, showing an identical set of choices to everyone, regardless of the current status of attendees' inputs and preferences. In this paper, we propose Togedule, an adaptive scheduling tool that uses large language models to dynamically adjust the pool of choices and their presentation format. With the initial prototype, we conducted a formative study (N=10) and identified the potential benefits and risks of such an adaptive scheduling tool. Then, after enhancing the system, we conducted two controlled experiments, one each for attendees and organizers (total N=66). For each experiment, we compared scheduling with verbal messages, shared c
Dynamic Cogeneration of Bug Reproduction Test in Agentic Program Repair
arXiv:2601.19066v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Bug Reproduction Tests (BRTs) have been used in many Automated Program Repair (APR) systems, primarily for validating promising fixes and aiding fix generation. In practice, when developers submit a patch, they often implement the BRT alongside the fix. Our experience deploying agentic APR reveals that developers similarly desire a BRT within AI-generated patches to increase their confidence. However, canonical APR systems tend to generate BRTs and fixes separately, and focus on producing only the fix in the final patch. In this paper, we study agentic APR in the context of cogeneration, where the APR agent is instructed to generate both a fix and a BRT in the same patch. We evaluate the effectiveness of different cogeneration strategies
The Necessity of a Holistic Safety Evaluation Framework for AI-Based Automation Features
arXiv:2602.05157v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: The intersection of Safety of Intended Functionality (SOTIF) and Functional Safety (FuSa) analysis of driving automation features has traditionally excluded Quality Management (QM) components (components that has no ASIL requirements allocated from vehicle-level HARA) from rigorous safety impact evaluations. While QM components are not typically classified as safety-relevant, recent developments in artificial intelligence (AI) integration reveal that such components can contribute to SOTIF-related hazardous risks. Compliance with emerging AI safety standards, such as ISO/PAS 8800, necessitates re-evaluating safety considerations for these components. This paper examines the necessity of conducting holistic safety analysis and risk assessm
Discussion
Sign in to join the discussion
No comments yet — be the first to share your thoughts!