Revisiting On-Policy Distillation: Empirical Failure Modes and Simple Fixes

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:On-policy distillation (OPD) is appealing for large language model (LLM) post-training because it evaluates teacher feedback on student-generated rollouts rather than fixed teacher traces. In long-horizon settings, however, the common sampled-token variant is fragile: it reduces distribution matching to a one-token signal and becomes increasingly unreliable as rollouts drift away from prefixes the teacher commonly visits. We revisit OPD from the estimator and implementation sides. Theoretically, token-level OPD is biased relative to sequence-level reverse-KL, but it has a much tighter worst-case variance bound; our toy study shows the same tradeoff empirically, with stronger future-reward coupling producing higher gradient variance and less stable learning. Empirically, we identify three failure modes of sampled-token OPD: an imbalanced one-token signal, unreliable teacher guidance on student-generated prefixes, and distortions caused by tokenizer or special-token mismatch. We address these issues with teacher top-K local support matching, implemented as truncated reverse-KL with top-p rollout sampling and special-token masking. Across single-task math reasoning and multi-task agentic-plus-math training, this objective yields more stable optimization and better downstream performance than sampled-token OPD.

Subjects:

Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computation and Language (cs.CL)

Cite as: arXiv:2603.25562 [cs.LG]

(or arXiv:2603.25562v1 [cs.LG] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.25562

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Yuqian Fu [view email] [v1] Thu, 26 Mar 2026 15:35:59 UTC (3,382 KB)