MLLM-based Textual Explanations for Face Comparison
arXiv:2603.16629v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have recently been proposed as a means to generate natural-language explanations for face recognition decisions. While such explanations facilitate human interpretability, their reliability on unconstrained face images remains underexplored. In this work, we systematically analyze MLLM-generated explanations for the unconstrained face verification task on the challenging IJB-S dataset, with a particular focus on extreme pose variation and surveillance imagery. Our results show that even when MLLM — Redwan Sony, Anil K Jain, Arun Ross
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have recently been proposed as a means to generate natural-language explanations for face recognition decisions. While such explanations facilitate human interpretability, their reliability on unconstrained face images remains underexplored. In this work, we systematically analyze MLLM-generated explanations for the unconstrained face verification task on the challenging IJB-S dataset, with a particular focus on extreme pose variation and surveillance imagery. Our results show that even when MLLMs produce correct verification decisions, the accompanying explanations frequently rely on non-verifiable or hallucinated facial attributes that are not supported by visual evidence. We further study the effect of incorporating information from traditional face recognition systems, viz., scores and decisions, alongside the input images. Although such information improves categorical verification performance, it does not consistently lead to faithful explanations. To evaluate the explanations beyond decision accuracy, we introduce a likelihood-ratio-based framework that measures the evidential strength of textual explanations. Our findings highlight fundamental limitations of current MLLMs for explainable face recognition and underscore the need for a principled evaluation of reliable and trustworthy explanations in biometric applications. Code is available at this https URL.
Comments: Accepted at 14th International Workshop on Biometrics and Forensics (IWBF)
Subjects:
Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
Cite as: arXiv:2603.16629 [cs.CV]
(or arXiv:2603.16629v3 [cs.CV] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.16629
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
Submission history
From: Redwan Sony [view email] [v1] Tue, 17 Mar 2026 15:01:00 UTC (7,932 KB) [v2] Wed, 18 Mar 2026 19:45:53 UTC (7,926 KB) [v3] Thu, 26 Mar 2026 19:05:31 UTC (7,926 KB)
Sign in to highlight and annotate this article

Conversation starters
Daily AI Digest
Get the top 5 AI stories delivered to your inbox every morning.
Knowledge Map
Connected Articles — Knowledge Graph
This article is connected to other articles through shared AI topics and tags.
More in Research Papers
Telia agrees Swedish sovereign AI deal with Brookfield - Telecompaper
<a href="https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMingFBVV95cUxQY1ZCaEFJUVJLNFJUOWoyLVBqVGxCdjQ1QUJ6WEdPdVFvU0ZMVnZpZG9IY1YxaFlFOXhqME1lRXBWd2x5Tjg2bDdnaWlzQUxwQkZPWG1KU1RwN25BelRhREJyTXEwZWI2Vk9nTTlLdnI1RDFhQnpWa3hpa1ZwTHc1cGNNVmVtckFianM2YlNVZXJFZ3U2X2NmMl9BcUN4QQ?oc=5" target="_blank">Telia agrees Swedish sovereign AI deal with Brookfield</a> <font color="#6f6f6f">Telecompaper</font>
Discussion
Sign in to join the discussion
No comments yet — be the first to share your thoughts!