Without controls, an AI agent can cost more than an employee
Without proper controls, AI agents can cost more than what outputs are worth according to Jason Calacanis and Chamath Palihapitiya , two IT experts and cohosts of popular podcast, All In podcast . During a recent episode, long-time tech investor Calacanis noted that agent costs quickly rose to $300 a day while using the Claude API at one of his organizations. At the same time, these $100,000-a-year agents were replacing only a fraction of an employee’s work. “When do tokens outpace the salary of the employee?” he asked. “Because you’re about to hit it. I’m about to hit it.” Palihapitiya, CEO at VC firm Social Capital, said his organization sets token budgets for its best developers, but unfettered agent use can get expensive. “If you aggregate it across all people, you can clearly see a tr
Could not retrieve the full article text.
Read on CIO Magazine →CIO Magazine
https://www.cio.com/article/4152601/without-controls-an-ai-agent-can-cost-more-than-an-employee.htmlSign in to highlight and annotate this article

Conversation starters
Daily AI Digest
Get the top 5 AI stories delivered to your inbox every morning.
Knowledge Map
Connected Articles — Knowledge Graph
This article is connected to other articles through shared AI topics and tags.
More in Products
![Considering NeurIPS submission [D]](https://d2xsxph8kpxj0f.cloudfront.net/310419663032563854/konzwo8nGf8Z4uZsMefwMr/default-img-robot-hand-JvPW6jsLFTCtkgtb97Kys5.webp)
Considering NeurIPS submission [D]
Wondering if it worth submitting paper I’m working on to NeurIPS. I have formal mathematical proof for convergence of a novel agentic system plus a compelling application to a real world use case. The problem is I just have a couple examples. I’ve tried working with synthetic data and benchmarks but no existing benchmarks captures the complexity of the real world data for any interesting results. Is it worth submitting or should I hold on to it until I can build up more data? submitted by /u/Clean-Baseball3748 [link] [comments]




Discussion
Sign in to join the discussion
No comments yet — be the first to share your thoughts!