Live
Black Hat USAAI BusinessBlack Hat AsiaAI BusinessPower Pages Authentication Methods: The Complete Guide (2026)DEV CommunityClaude Code Unpacked: what the visual guide reveals about the architectureDEV CommunityExolane Review: What It Gets Right on Custody, Funding Caps, and RiskDEV CommunityGitHub Agentic Workflows: AI Agents Are Coming for Your Repository Maintenance Tasks (And That's a Good Thing)DEV CommunityAlibaba Launches XuanTie C950 CPU for Agentic AIEE TimesThe Illusion of Data Custody in Legal AI — and the Architecture I Built to Replace ItDEV CommunityI use these 5 simple ‘ChatGPT codes’ every day — and they instantly improve my results - TechRadarGoogle News: ChatGPTTurboQuant, KIVI, and the Real Cost of Long-Context KV CacheDEV CommunityWhy ChatGPT Cites Your Competitors (Not You)DEV CommunityIntroducing Anti-Moral RealismLessWrong AIFrom idea to live web app in minutes with Spektrum. An AI-powered web app builder for MVPs, rapid prototyping, and full-stack JavaScript apps. Skip setup, generate real products, and deploy instantly without infrastructure headaches. 🔥DEV CommunityAnthropic Just Proved That Codebase Governance Is Now the #1 Priority for Every Engineering OrgDEV CommunityBlack Hat USAAI BusinessBlack Hat AsiaAI BusinessPower Pages Authentication Methods: The Complete Guide (2026)DEV CommunityClaude Code Unpacked: what the visual guide reveals about the architectureDEV CommunityExolane Review: What It Gets Right on Custody, Funding Caps, and RiskDEV CommunityGitHub Agentic Workflows: AI Agents Are Coming for Your Repository Maintenance Tasks (And That's a Good Thing)DEV CommunityAlibaba Launches XuanTie C950 CPU for Agentic AIEE TimesThe Illusion of Data Custody in Legal AI — and the Architecture I Built to Replace ItDEV CommunityI use these 5 simple ‘ChatGPT codes’ every day — and they instantly improve my results - TechRadarGoogle News: ChatGPTTurboQuant, KIVI, and the Real Cost of Long-Context KV CacheDEV CommunityWhy ChatGPT Cites Your Competitors (Not You)DEV CommunityIntroducing Anti-Moral RealismLessWrong AIFrom idea to live web app in minutes with Spektrum. An AI-powered web app builder for MVPs, rapid prototyping, and full-stack JavaScript apps. Skip setup, generate real products, and deploy instantly without infrastructure headaches. 🔥DEV CommunityAnthropic Just Proved That Codebase Governance Is Now the #1 Priority for Every Engineering OrgDEV Community

Wikipedia bans AI-generated articles

The Verge AIby Emma RothMarch 26, 20262 min read0 views
Source Quiz

Wikipedia will no longer allow editors to write or rewrite articles using AI. The update, which was added to Wikipedia's guidelines late last week, cites the tendency for AI-written articles to violate "several of Wikipedia's core content policies" as the reason for the ban. The change applies to the English version of Wikipedia and will […]

Emma Roth

is a news writer who covers the streaming wars, consumer tech, crypto, social media, and much more. Previously, she was a writer and editor at MUO.

Wikipedia will no longer allow editors to write or rewrite articles using AI. The update, which was added to Wikipedia’s guidelines late last week, cites the tendency for AI-written articles to violate “several of Wikipedia’s core content policies” as the reason for the ban.

The change applies to the English version of Wikipedia and will still allow editors to use AI in certain scenarios. That includes using large language models to “suggest basic copyedits” to their writing, but only if it “does not introduce content of its own.” Editors can also use AI to translate articles from another language’s Wikipedia into English. However, they still must follow the site’s rules on LLM-assisted translations, which require editors to have enough knowledge of the original language to confirm the accuracy of the translation.

The new policy warns that some people “may have similar writing styles to LLMs,” and editors will need to find more than just “stylistic or linguistic signs” to justify potential restrictions on their editing capabilities. “It is best to consider the text’s compliance with core content policies and recent edits by the editor in question,” the guidelines state.

Wikipedia editors have been contending with AI-generated articles for months now, leading the community to implement a new policy to allow for the “speedy deletion” of poorly written articles. Editors also formed WikiProject AI Cleanup, an initiative meant to combat AI-written content and help others identify it.

This most recent change to Wikipedia’s guidelines was proposed by Chaotic Enby, sparking a lengthy discussion between editors. The proposal eventually passed with “overwhelming support,” concluding that the policy “targets blatantly problematic issues with LLM use, while still giving leeway for what are seen as decent uses for it.”

Follow topics and authors from this story to see more like this in your personalized homepage feed and to receive email updates.

  • Emma Roth
Was this article helpful?

Sign in to highlight and annotate this article

AI
Ask AI about this article
Powered by AI News Hub · full article context loaded
Ready

Conversation starters

Ask anything about this article…

Daily AI Digest

Get the top 5 AI stories delivered to your inbox every morning.

Knowledge Map

Knowledge Map
TopicsEntitiesSource
Wikipedia b…AI Governan…AI SafetyHallucinati…Responsible…The Verge AI

Connected Articles — Knowledge Graph

This article is connected to other articles through shared AI topics and tags.

Knowledge Graph100 articles · 160 connections
Scroll to zoom · drag to pan · click to open

Discussion

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet — be the first to share your thoughts!

More in Products