Vlaanderen stelt leeftijdsgrens van 13 jaar in voor schadelijke sociale media
De Vlaamse regering komt met een wettelijke leeftijdsgrens van 13 jaar voor schadelijke sociale media . Diensten moeten kinderen onder de 13 jaar daarmee verplicht van hun platform weren. Welke diensten precies als schadelijk worden aangemerkt, is nog niet geheel duidelijk.
Could not retrieve the full article text.
Read on Tweakers.net →Sign in to highlight and annotate this article
Conversation starters
Daily AI Digest
Get the top 5 AI stories delivered to your inbox every morning.
More about
platform
⚖️ AI Is Transforming Legal Practice in Romania — Why Lawyers Who Ignore It Are Already Falling Behind
⚖️ AI Is Transforming Legal Practice in Romania — And Most Lawyers Aren't Ready The legal profession has survived centuries of change. From handwritten scrolls to typewriters, from physical archives to digital databases, lawyers have always adapted — eventually. But the current wave of transformation is different. It's faster, deeper, and far less forgiving to those who hesitate. Artificial intelligence is no longer a Silicon Valley curiosity. It's drafting contracts, analyzing jurisprudence, conducting due diligence, and managing entire case strategies. And in Romania — a country with a rapidly modernizing legal market and increasing pressure from EU regulations — the lawyers who ignore this shift are building their practices on borrowed time. 🏛️ The Romanian Legal Market at a Crossroads
Why I Use Claude Code for Everything
Most Claude users split their work across three products. Chat for conversations and questions. Code for development. Cowork for task management and desktop automation. Three interfaces, three separate memory systems, three places where your context gets fragmented. I stopped doing that. I run everything through Claude Code. One interface, one memory system, full control. Here is how and why. The Problem With Splitting Your Work When you use Chat for a planning conversation, then switch to Code for implementation, then use Cowork to manage tasks, each one starts from zero. Chat does not know what you discussed in Code. Code does not know what you planned in Chat. You re-explain context every time you switch. Even within each product, memory is limited. Chat has built-in memory but it is se
Why OpenAI Buying TBPN Matters More Than It Looks
OpenAI’s acquisition of TBPN, the fast-rising tech talk show founded by John Coogan and Jordi Hays, looks odd at first glance. This is the company behind ChatGPT and frontier model research, not a legacy media group trying to add another audience property. But the move is more interesting than a simple brand play. It signals that the next phase of the AI race will not be won on model quality alone. It will also be fought on narrative, trust, distribution, and who gets to frame the future of AI for everyone else. According to Reuters, OpenAI bought TBPN after the show built a loyal Silicon Valley following through interviews with major industry leaders. The founders are joining OpenAI, and the company says the goal is to communicate its plans better and help shape the conversation around th
Knowledge Map
Connected Articles — Knowledge Graph
This article is connected to other articles through shared AI topics and tags.
More in Products
Top 10 AI Writing Tools for 2026: Complete Guide
Top 10 AI Writing Tools for 2026: Complete Guide Introduction AI writing tools are transforming content creation. But with so many options, which ones are actually worth using? In this guide, I'll share the top 10 AI writing tools for 2026. I've tested dozens of AI writing tools over the past year. These are the 10 that consistently produce the best results. The Top 10 AI Writing Tools for 2026 1. Jasper AI Best for: Overall content creation Why it's #1: Jasper AI consistently produces the highest quality content across all categories. It's the most versatile tool on the market. Key features: 50+ templates Brand voice customization SEO optimization Team collaboration Pricing: Starter: $49/month (35,000 words) Pro: $99/month (unlimited words) Business: Custom pricing Best for: Content marke
Why I Use Claude Code for Everything
Most Claude users split their work across three products. Chat for conversations and questions. Code for development. Cowork for task management and desktop automation. Three interfaces, three separate memory systems, three places where your context gets fragmented. I stopped doing that. I run everything through Claude Code. One interface, one memory system, full control. Here is how and why. The Problem With Splitting Your Work When you use Chat for a planning conversation, then switch to Code for implementation, then use Cowork to manage tasks, each one starts from zero. Chat does not know what you discussed in Code. Code does not know what you planned in Chat. You re-explain context every time you switch. Even within each product, memory is limited. Chat has built-in memory but it is se
Discussion
Sign in to join the discussion
No comments yet — be the first to share your thoughts!