Virtual reality and agential moral enhancement

References

• Anderson, E. (1991). John Stuart Mill and Experiments in Living. Ethics, 102(1), 4–26.

Article  MathSciNet

Google Scholar

• Anderson, E. (2023). Dewey’s Moral Philosophy. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Spring 2023, edited by Edward N. Zalta and Uri Nodelman. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2023/entries/dewey-moral/
• Annas, J. (2006). Virtue Ethics. In The Oxford Handbook of Ethical Theory, edited by David Copp. Oxford Handbooks in Philosophy. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195325911.001.0001
• Annas, J. (2011). Intelligent Virtue. Oxford University Press.
• Aristotle (2014). Aristotle: Nicomachean Ethics. 2nd ed. Edited by Roger Crisp. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139600514
• Arts at MIT. (2017). The Enemy. https://arts.mit.edu/the-enemy/
• Bailenson, J. (2018). Experience on Demand: What Virtual Reality Is, How It Works, and What It Can Do. W. W. Norton & Company.
• Banakou, D., Hanumanthu, P. D., & Slater, M. (2016). Virtual Embodiment of White People in a Black Virtual Body Leads to a Sustained Reduction in Their Implicit Racial Bias. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2016.00601
• BeAnotherLab. (2014). Body Swap: An Installation That Promotes Respect, Understanding & Mutual Agreement. https://beanotherlab.org/home/work/tmtba/body-swap/
• Bloom, P. (2016). Against Empathy: The Case for Rational Compassion. First edition. Ecco.
• Bollmer, G. (2017). Empathy Machines. Media International Australia, 165(1), 63–76. https://doi.org/10.1177/1329878X17726794

Article

Google Scholar

• Braun, N., Debener, S., Spychala, N., Bongartz, E., Sörös, P., Müller, H. H., & Philipsen, A. (2018). The Senses of Agency and Ownership: A Review. Frontiers in Psychology, 9 (April). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00535
• Chowdhury, T. I., Ferdous, S. M. S., and Quarles J. (2021). VR Disability Simulation Reduces Implicit Bias towards Persons with Disabilities. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 27(6), 3079–3090. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2019.2958332

Article

Google Scholar

• Cotton, M. (2021). Virtual Reality, Empathy and Ethics. Springer.
• Dancy, J. (1983). Ethical Particularism and Morally Relevant Properties. Mind, 92(368), 530–547. https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/XCII.368.530

Article

Google Scholar

• Dancy, J. (2010). Moral Reasons. Repr. Blackwell.
• Decety, J. (2010). The Neurodevelopment of Empathy in Humans. Developmental Neuroscience, 32(4), 257–267. https://doi.org/10.1159/000317771

Article

Google Scholar

• Dewey, J. (1978). How We Think. In The Middle Works of John Dewey, Volume 6, 1899–1924: Journal Articles, Book Reviews, Miscellany in the 1910–1911 Period, and How We Think, First Edition, edited by Jo Ann Boydston, H. S. Thayer, and V. T. Thayer. Southern Illinois University Press.
• Dewey, J. (1982). Reconstruction in Philosophy. In John Dewey: The Middle Works, 1899–1924. Vol 12: 1920., First Edition, edited by Jo Ann Boydston and Ralph Ross. Southern Illinois University Press.
• Dewey, J. (2008a). The Later Works of John Dewey, Vol 7, 1925–1953: 1932, Ethics. First Edition. Edited by Jo Ann Boydston, Abraham Edel, and Elizabeth Flower. Southern Illinois University Press.
• Dewey, J. (2008b). Theory of Valuation. In The Later Works of John Dewey, Vol 13, 1925–1953, edited by Jo Ann Boydston, with Steven M. Cahn. Southern Illinois University Press.
• Dewey, J. (2008c). Three Independent Factors in Morals. In The Later Works of John Dewey, Volume 5, 1925–1953: 1929–1930, Essays, the Sources of a Science of Education, Individualism, Old and New, And …, First Edition, edited by Jo Ann Boydston and Paul Kurtz. Southern Illinois University Press.
• Dewey, J. (2008d). Value, Objective Reference, and Criticism. In The Later Works of John Dewey, Vol 2, 1925–1953, edited by Jo Ann Boydston, with James Gouinlock. Southern Illinois University Press.
• Doleželová, E. (2016). Wiesnerová, eng Jana. To Torture or Not to Torture a Mad Bomber? How Does the Moral Dilemma Work in Virtual Reality. Em.Muni.Cz, September 5. https://www.em.muni.cz/en/science/8122-to-torture-or-not-to-torture-a-mad-bomber-how-does-the-moral-dilemma-work-in-virtual-reality
• Drewski, D., & Gerhards, J. (2025). Frames and Arguments on the Admission of Refugees: An Empirically Grounded Typology. Theory and Society, 54(1), 57–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-024-09583-2

Article

Google Scholar

• Dunivan, D. W., Mann, P., Collins, D., & Wittmer, D. P. (2024). Expanding the Empirical Study of Virtual Reality beyond Empathy to Compassion, Moral Reasoning, and Moral Foundations. Frontiers in Psychology, 15 (June). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1402754
• Earp, B. D. (2018). Psychedelic Moral Enhancement. Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplements, 83(October), 415–439. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1358246118000474

Article

Google Scholar

• Earp, B. D., Douglas, T., & Savulescu, J. (2017). Moral Neuroenhancement. In L. S. M. Johnson & K. S. Rommelfanger (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Neuroethics (pp. 166–184). Routledge.
• Fabi, S., Weber, L. A., & Leuthold, H. (2019). Empathic Concern and Personal Distress Depend on Situational but Not Dispositional Factors. PLOS ONE, 14(11), e0225102. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0225102

Article

Google Scholar

• Focquaert, F., & Schermer, M. (2015). Moral Enhancement: Do Means Matter Morally? Neuroethics, 8(2), 139–151. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12152-015-9230-y

Article

Google Scholar

• Glover, J. (2014). Alien Landscapes? Interpreting Disordered Minds. First Edition. Belknap Press: An Imprint of Harvard University Press.
• Gordon, E. C., Cheung, K., Earp, B. D., & Savulescu, J. (2024). Moral Enhancement and Cheapened Achievement: Psychedelics, Virtual Reality and AI. Bioethics November, 20, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1111/bioe.13374

Article

Google Scholar

• Hamari, J., Koivisto, J., & Sarsa, H. (2014). Does Gamification Work? – A Literature Review of Empirical Studies on Gamification. 2014 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, January, 3025–34. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2014.377
• Harris, J. (2011). Moral Enhancement and Freedom. Bioethics, 25(2), 102–111. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8519.2010.01854.x

Article

Google Scholar

• Hasler, B. S., Daniel, H., Landau, Y., Hasson, Schori-Eyal, N., Giron, J., Levy, J., & Friedman, D. (2021). Virtual Reality-Based Conflict Resolution: The Impact of Immersive 360° Video on Changing View Points and Moral Judgment in the Context of Violent Intergroup Conflict. New Media & Society, 23(8), 2255–2278. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444821993133

Article

Google Scholar

• Herrera, F., Bailenson, J., Weisz, E., Ogle, E., & Zaki, J. (2018). Building Long-Term Empathy: A Large-Scale Comparison of Traditional and Virtual Reality Perspective-Taking. PLOS ONE, 13(10), e0204494. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0204494

Article

Google Scholar

• Ihde, D. (Ed.). (2010). Technology and the Lifeworld: From Garden to Earth. Indiana Series in the Philosophy of Technology. Indiana University Press.
• Jackson, M. B., & Jackson, B. B. (2024). Immersive Experience and Virtual Reality. Philosophy and Technology, 37(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-024-00707-1

Article

Google Scholar

• Ku, G., Wang, C. S., & Galinsky, A. D. (2015). The Promise and Perversity of Perspective-Taking in Organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 35(January), 79–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2015.07.003

Article

Google Scholar

• Lara, F., & Deckers, J. (2020). Artificial Intelligence as a Socratic Assistant for Moral Enhancement. Neuroethics, 13(3), 275–287. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12152-019-09401-y

Article

Google Scholar

• Lara, F. (2021a). Why a Virtual Assistant for Moral Enhancement When We Could Have a Socrates? Science and Engineering Ethics, 27(4), 42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-021-00318-5

Article

Google Scholar

• Lara, F., & Rueda, J. (2021b). Virtual Reality Not for ‘Being Someone’ but for ‘Being in Someone Else’s Shoes’: Avoiding Misconceptions in Empathy Enhancement. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 3674. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.741516

Article

Google Scholar

• Lerner, D., Mohr, S., Schild, J., Göring, M., & Luiz, T. (2020). An Immersive Multi-User Virtual Reality for Emergency Simulation Training: Usability Study. JMIR Serious Games, 8(3), e18822. https://doi.org/10.2196/18822

Article

Google Scholar

• Liberman, N., & Trope, Y. (1998). The Role of Feasibility and Desirability Considerations in near and Distant Future Decisions: A Test of Temporal Construal Theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (US), 75(1), 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.75.1.5

Article

Google Scholar

• Liu, Y. L., Chang, C. Y., & Wang, C. H. (2023). Using VR to Investigate Bystander Behavior and the Motivational Factors in School Bullying. Computers & Education, 194 (March), 104696. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104696

Article

Google Scholar

• Loranger, C., & Bouchard, S. (2017). Validating a Virtual Environment for Sexual Assault Victims. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 30(2), 157–165. https://doi.org/10.1002/jts.22170

Article

Google Scholar

• Lydon-Staley, D. M. (2024). Your Emotions Are Affected by the News You Consume. SPSP. https://spsp.org/news/character-and-context-blog/lydon-staley-news-consumption-affects-emotions
• MacIntyre, A. (2007). After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory, Third Edition. University of Notre Dame Press.
• Madary, M., & Metzinger, T. K. (2016). Real Virtuality: A Code of Ethical Conduct. Recommendations for Good Scientific Practice and the Consumers of VR-Technology. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 3 (February). https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2016.00003
• Malm, S. (2016). Swedish Swimming Pools Introduce Women-Only Sessions. News. Mail Online, May 31. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3617465/Swedish-swimming-pools-introduce-women-sessions-accommodate-rising-number-Muslim-population.html
• Martingano, A. J., Hererra, F., & Konrath, S. (2021). Virtual Reality Improves Emotional but Not Cognitive Empathy: A Meta-Analysis. Technology Mind and Behavior, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.1037/tmb0000034
• McNaughton, D. (1988). Moral Vision: An Introduction to Ethics. Blackwell.
• Melloni, M., Lopez, V., & Ibanez, A. (2014). Empathy and Contextual Social Cognition. Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience, 14(1), 407–425. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-013-0205-3

Article

Google Scholar

• Milk, C. (2015). How Virtual Reality Can Create the Ultimate Empathy Machine. 615. https://www.ted.com/talks/chris_milk_how_virtual_reality_can_create_the_ultimate_empathy_machine
• Moser, I., Chiquet, S., Strahm, S. K., Mast, F. W., & Bergamin, P. (2020). Group Decision-Making in Multi-User Immersive Virtual Reality. Cyberpsychology Behavior and Social Networking, 23(12), 846–853. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2020.0065

Article

Google Scholar

• Nakamura, L. (2013). Cybertypes: Race, Ethnicity, and Identity on the Internet. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203699188
• Nash, K. (2018). Virtual Reality Witness: Exploring the Ethics of Mediated Presence. Studies in Documentary Film, May 4. world. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/https://doi.org/10.1080/17503280.2017.1340796
• Persson, I., & Savulescu, J. (2018). The Moral Importance of Reflective Empathy. Neuroethics, 11(2), 183–193. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12152-017-9350-7

Article

Google Scholar

• Prinz, J. (2011). Against Empathy. The Southern Journal of Philosophy, 49(s1), 214–233. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-6962.2011.00069.x

Article

Google Scholar

• Ramirez, E. J. (2019). Ecological and Ethical Issues in Virtual Reality Research: A Call for Increased Scrutiny. Philosophical Psychology, 32(2), 211–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2018.1532073

Article

Google Scholar

• Ramirez, E. J., & LaBarge, S. (2020). Ethical Issues with Simulating the Bridge Problem in VR. Science and Engineering Ethics, 26(6), 3313–3331. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-020-00267-5

Article

Google Scholar

• Ramirez, E. J. (2024). The Ethics of Virtual and Augmented Reality: Building Worlds. 1st edition. Routledge.
• Ramirez, E. J., Elliott, M., & Milam P. E. (2021). What It?S like to Be a \emph___: Why It?S (Often) Unethical to Use vr as an Empathy Nudging Tool. Ethics and Information Technology, 1(3), 527–542. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-021-09594-y__

Article

Google Scholar

• Ruberg, B. (2020). Empathy and Its Alternatives: Deconstructing the Rhetoric of ‘Empathy’ in Video Games. Communication Culture and Critique, 13(1), 54–71. https://doi.org/10.1093/ccc/tcz044

Article

Google Scholar

• Rueda, J., & Lara, F. (2020). Virtual Reality and Empathy Enhancement: Ethical Aspects. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2020.506984. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/
• Rueda, J. & Horgan, E. D. (2022). A Virtual Prosthesis for Morality? Experiential Learning through XR Technologies for Autonomy Enhancement of Psychiatric Offenders. AJOB Neuroscience, July 3. world. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/https://doi.org/10.1080/21507740.2022.2082584
• Rueda, J. (2023). Doing Good with Virtual Reality: The Ethics of Using Virtual Simulations for Improving Human Morality. In Exploring Extended Realities: Metaphysical, Psychological, and Ethical Challenges, edited by Andrew Kissel and Erick José Ramirez.
• Russell, D. C. (2011). Practical Intelligence and the Virtues. 1. publ. in paperback. Clarendon Press.
• Sadeh-Sharvit, S., Giron, J., Fridman, S., Hanrieder, M., Goldstein, S., Friedman, D., & Brokman, S. (2021). Virtual Reality in Sexual Harassment Prevention: Proof-of-Concept Study. Proceedings of the 21st ACM International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents (New York, NY, USA), IVA ’21, September 14, 87–89. https://doi.org/10.1145/3472306.3478356
• Sartre, J. P. (2007). Existentialism Is a Humanism. Translated by Carol Macomber. With John Kulka and Arlette Elkaïm-Sartre. Yale University Press.
• Savulescu, J., & Maslen, H. (2015). Moral Enhancement and Artificial Intelligence: Moral AI? In Beyond Artificial Intelligence: The Disappearing Human-Machine Divide, edited by Jan Romportl, Eva Zackova, and Jozef Kelemen. Topics in Intelligent Engineering and Informatics. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09668-1_6
• Seinfeld, S., Arroyo-Palacios, J., Iruretagoyena, G., Hortensius, R., Zapata, L. E., Borland, D., & Sanchez-Vives, M. V. (2018). Offenders Become the Victim in Virtual Reality: Impact of Changing Perspective in Domestic Violence. Scientific Reports, 8(1), 2692. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-19987-7

Article

Google Scholar

• Shim, J. (2023). Investigating the Effectiveness of Introducing Virtual Reality to Elementary School Students’ Moral Education. Computers & Education: X Reality, 2 (January), 100010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cexr.2023.100010

Article

Google Scholar

• Slater, M., & Banakou, D. (2021). The Golden Rule as a Paradigm for Fostering Prosocial Behavior with Virtual Reality. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 30(6), 503–509. https://doi.org/10.1177/09637214211046954

Article

Google Scholar

• Slater, M., Spanlang, B., Sanchez-Vives, M. V., & Blanke, O. (2010). First Person Experience of Body Transfer in Virtual Reality. PLOS ONE, 5(5), e10564. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0010564

Article

Google Scholar

• Sora-Domenjó, C. (2022). Disrupting the ‘Empathy Machine’: The Power and Perils of Virtual Reality in Addressing Social Issues. Frontiers in Psychology, 13 (September). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.814565
• Sun, B., Fu, G. K., & Guo, S. (2025). Ashes or Breath: Exploring Moral Dilemmas of Life and Cultural Legacy through Mixed Reality Gaming. arXiv:2508.13074. Preprint, arXiv, August 18. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2508.13074
• Szuster, A., & Jarymowicz, M. (2020). Human Empathy of Automatic vs. Reflective Origin: Diverse Attributes and Regulative Consequences. New Ideas in Psychology, 56 (January), 100748. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2019.100748

Article

Google Scholar

• The Frank-Ratchye STUDIO for Creative Inquiry. (2022). WEIRD REALITY: Head-Mounted Art && Code:: Wendy Hui Kyong Chun. YouTube Video. April 5, 2022. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=62ks05DEhmo&list=PLYtnHHMNhiwo_BJAq2xYV3bZNWo6K4v7G&index=20. Accessed October 24, 2025.
• Wang, G., Wang, W., Cao, Y., Teng, Y., Guo, Q., Wang, H., & Wang, Y. (2024). Possibilities and Challenges in the Moral Growth of Large Language Models: A Philosophical Perspective. Ethics and Information Technology, 27(1), 9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-024-09818-x

Article

Google Scholar

• Yang, R. (2017). ‘If You Walk in Someone Else’s Shoes, Then You’ve Taken Their Shoes’: Empathy Machines as Appropriation Machines. Radiator Design Blog, April 5, 2017. https://www.blog.radiator.debacle.us/2017/04/if-you-walk-in-someone-elses-shoes-then.html. Accessed October 24, 2025.
• Yang, Y., & Zhou, J. (2025). Damage and Restoration of Personal Identity in Deep Brain Stimulation: A Relational Perspective. Neuroethics, 18(3), 42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12152-025-09614-4

Article

Google Scholar

• Zahiu, A., Mihailov, E., Earp, B. D., Francis, K. B., & Savulescu, J. (2023). Empathy Training through Virtual Reality: Moral Enhancement with the Freedom to Fall? Ethics and Information Technology, 25(4), 50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-023-09723-9

Article

Google Scholar

• Zhou, J. (2024). Moral Progress and Grand Narrative Genealogy. Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, February, 1–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020174X.2024.2312208
• Zhou, J., Cao, Y., Ji, J., & Wang, G. (2026). Enhancing the Teaching of Applied Ethics with Virtual-Reality-Presented Thought Experiments. Teaching Philosophy, 49(1), 97–126. https://doi.org/10.5840/teachphil2026227242
• Zillmann, D. (1988). Mood Management through Communication Choices. American Behavioral Scientist, 31(3), 327–340. https://doi.org/10.1177/000276488031003005

Article

Google Scholar

Download references