Variational Graph Neural Networks for Uncertainty Quantification in Inverse Problems
arXiv:2603.29515v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The increasingly wide use of deep machine learning techniques in computational mechanics has significantly accelerated simulations of problems that were considered unapproachable just a few years ago. However, in critical applications such as Digital Twins for engineering or medicine, fast responses are not enough; reliable results must also be provided. In certain cases, traditional deterministic methods may not be optimal as they do not provide a measure of confidence in their predictions or results, especially in inverse problems where the solution may not be unique or the initial data may not be entirely reliable due to the presence of noise, for instance. Classic deep neural networks also lack a clear measure to quantify the uncertainty
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:The increasingly wide use of deep machine learning techniques in computational mechanics has significantly accelerated simulations of problems that were considered unapproachable just a few years ago. However, in critical applications such as Digital Twins for engineering or medicine, fast responses are not enough; reliable results must also be provided. In certain cases, traditional deterministic methods may not be optimal as they do not provide a measure of confidence in their predictions or results, especially in inverse problems where the solution may not be unique or the initial data may not be entirely reliable due to the presence of noise, for instance. Classic deep neural networks also lack a clear measure to quantify the uncertainty of their predictions. In this work, we present a variational graph neural network (VGNN) architecture that integrates variational layers into its architecture to model the probability distribution of weights. Unlike computationally expensive full Bayesian networks, our approach strategically introduces variational layers exclusively in the decoder, allowing us to estimate cognitive uncertainty and statistical uncertainty at a relatively lower cost. In this work, we validate the proposed methodology in two cases of solid mechanics: the identification of the value of the elastic modulus with nonlinear distribution in a 2D elastic problem and the location and quantification of the loads applied to a 3D hyperelastic beam, in both cases using only the displacement field of each test as input data. The results show that the model not only recovers the physical parameters with high precision, but also provides confidence intervals consistent with the physics of the problem, as well as being able to locate the position of the applied load and estimate its value, giving a confidence interval for that experiment.
Subjects:
Machine Learning (cs.LG)
Cite as: arXiv:2603.29515 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2603.29515v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.29515
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
Submission history
From: Elias Cueto [view email] [v1] Tue, 31 Mar 2026 09:57:52 UTC (3,550 KB)
Sign in to highlight and annotate this article
Conversation starters
Daily AI Digest
Get the top 5 AI stories delivered to your inbox every morning.
More about
modelneural networkannounce
A Very Fine Untuning
How fine-tuning made my chatbot worse (and broke my RAG pipeline) I spent weeks trying to improve my personal chatbot, Virtual Alexandra , with fine-tuning. Instead I got increased hallucination rate and broken retrieval in my RAG system. Yes, this is a story about a failed attempt, not a successful one. My husband and I called fine tuning results “Drunk Alexandra” — incoherent answers that were initially funny, but quickly became annoying. After weeks of experiments, I reached a simple conclusion: for this particular project, a small chatbot that answers questions based on my writing and instructions, fine tuning was not a good option. It was not just unnecessary, it actively degraded the experience and didn’t justify the extra time, cost, or complexity compared to the prompt + RAG system
Google's TurboQuant saves memory, but won't save us from DRAM-pricing hell
<h4>Chocolate Factory’s compression tech clears the way to cheaper AI inference, not more affordable memory</h4> <p>When Google unveiled <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="https://research.google/blog/turboquant-redefining-ai-efficiency-with-extreme-compression/">TurboQuant</a>, an AI data compression technology that promises to slash the amount of memory required to serve models, many hoped it would help with a memory shortage that has seen prices triple since last year. Not so much.…</p>
I Built a Portable Text Editor for Windows — One .exe File, No Installation, Forever Free
<p>A solo developer's story of building the Notepad replacement that should have existed years ago.</p> <p>I've been using Windows my whole life. And my whole life, every time I needed to write something with a bit of formatting — a heading, some bold text, a colored note — I ended up either opening Word (too heavy), using Notepad (too limited), or pasting into a browser-based tool (too many accounts).</p> <p>WordPad was the middle ground. Then Microsoft removed it from Windows 11.<br> That was the moment I decided to build my own.</p> <h2> The Problem I Was Solving </h2> <p>Let me be specific about what I needed, because "text editor" covers everything from Vim to Google Docs.</p> <p>I wanted something that:</p> <ul> <li>Requires zero installation. I work on multiple machines — personal,
Knowledge Map
Connected Articles — Knowledge Graph
This article is connected to other articles through shared AI topics and tags.
More in Models
A Very Fine Untuning
How fine-tuning made my chatbot worse (and broke my RAG pipeline) I spent weeks trying to improve my personal chatbot, Virtual Alexandra , with fine-tuning. Instead I got increased hallucination rate and broken retrieval in my RAG system. Yes, this is a story about a failed attempt, not a successful one. My husband and I called fine tuning results “Drunk Alexandra” — incoherent answers that were initially funny, but quickly became annoying. After weeks of experiments, I reached a simple conclusion: for this particular project, a small chatbot that answers questions based on my writing and instructions, fine tuning was not a good option. It was not just unnecessary, it actively degraded the experience and didn’t justify the extra time, cost, or complexity compared to the prompt + RAG system
Google's TurboQuant saves memory, but won't save us from DRAM-pricing hell
<h4>Chocolate Factory’s compression tech clears the way to cheaper AI inference, not more affordable memory</h4> <p>When Google unveiled <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="https://research.google/blog/turboquant-redefining-ai-efficiency-with-extreme-compression/">TurboQuant</a>, an AI data compression technology that promises to slash the amount of memory required to serve models, many hoped it would help with a memory shortage that has seen prices triple since last year. Not so much.…</p>
Introducing The Screwtape Ladders
The time has come for me to find a new home for my writings. Like many an author before me, I've enjoyed improving my craft and getting feedback on my essays here. LessWrong is a good incubator for honing one's skills in that arena. There's a chance to get your point out in front of a really broad audience of really smart people. There's been some cool moments. My oldest visible post, Write A Thousand Roads to Rome , got cited in a discussion with Eliezer Yudkowsky once. I keep seeing people bring up Loudly Give Up, Don't Quietly Fade as a motivator for speaking out. Sometimes it's really cool people working on awesome projects, and I feel a flash of sadness at 'aww, it's not going to happen' and also a bit of cool 'whoa, they remember that post?' You've all also let me get away with a lot
Anthropic Executive Sees Cowork Agent as Bigger Than Claude Code - Bloomberg.com
<a href="https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMitgFBVV95cUxOM0VfSzdRYUNpT21XMlVuNXhsVEY4TUFxM3UzWUJDOEhFcUtJQnhTbjY2VjBXOUw1d1ZOUDRKeHVKMzkta3pFVWRWSGNoQkp3aWVndlRBQlpVUGxVN0ZnQW80OUZnYWN6RlhJWHRjT0V4RVhPcGhxMmE3b3oyVDlUV2RLY0g2NEx4M1dfMXhvTlhPTW50eFR1cEhxcHB3SXpURnRtbDZtZHp6bGQ2Z09IMjZBODBjdw?oc=5" target="_blank">Anthropic Executive Sees Cowork Agent as Bigger Than Claude Code</a> <font color="#6f6f6f">Bloomberg.com</font>
Discussion
Sign in to join the discussion
No comments yet — be the first to share your thoughts!