Unbreakable? Researchers warn quantum computers have serious security flaws
Quantum computers could revolutionize everything from drug discovery to business analytics—but their incredible power also makes them surprisingly vulnerable. New research from Penn State warns that today’s quantum machines are not just futuristic tools, but potential gold mines for hackers. The study reveals that weaknesses can exist not only in software, but deep within the physical hardware itself, where valuable algorithms and sensitive data may be exposed.
Quantum computers are expected to deliver extraordinary speed and computing power, with the potential to transform scientific research and business operations. That same power also makes them especially appealing targets for cyberattacks, said Swaroop Ghosh, a professor of computer science and electrical engineering at the Penn State School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science.
Ghosh and Suryansh Upadhyay, who recently earned his doctorate in electrical engineering from Penn State, coauthored a research paper that outlines several serious security weaknesses affecting today's quantum computing systems. Published online in the Proceedings of the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), the study argues that protecting quantum computers requires more than securing software alone. The physical hardware that runs these systems must also be part of any serious defense strategy.
In a Question and Answer discussion, Ghosh and Upadhyay explained how quantum computers work, why they face unique security challenges, and what steps developers can take to prepare these machines for wider use.
Q: What makes a quantum computer different from a traditional computer?
Ghosh: Traditional computing works using units of information called bits, which you can picture as a light switch in the "on" or "off" position. These positions are assigned values of one or zero, with one representing on and zero representing off. We program computers by using algorithms or educated guesses to develop the best possible solution for a problem, compiling this solution to generate machine-level instructions -- directions specifying which bits need to equal one and which bits need to equal zero -- that the computer follows to execute a task.
Quantum computers are built on quantum bits, or qubits. These qubits are much more versatile than standard bits, capable of effectively representing one, zero or both at the same time, otherwise known as a superposition. These qubits can also be linked to one another, known as entanglement. By incorporating superpositions and entanglement into decision making, quantum computers can process exponentially more data than bit-powered computing systems, while using an equivalent number of qubits.
This is useful for improving workflows in many industries, since quantum computers can process information much faster than traditional computers. One example is the pharmaceutical industry, where quantum computing can quickly process data and predict the efficacy of potential new drugs, significantly streamlining the research and development process. This can save companies billions of dollars and decades spent researching, testing and fabricating innovative drugs.
Q: What are some of the main security vulnerabilities facing quantum computers right now?
Upadhyay: Currently, there is no efficient way to verify the integrity of programs and compilers -- many of which are developed by third parties -- used by quantum computers at scale, which can leave users' sensitive corporate and personal information open to theft, tampering and reverse engineering.
Many quantum computing algorithms have businesses' intellectual property integrated directly in their circuits, which are used to process highly specific problems involving client data and other sensitive information. If these circuits are exposed, attackers can extract company-created algorithms, financial positions or critical infrastructure details. Additionally, the interconnectedness that allows qubits to operate so efficiently inadvertently creates a security vulnerability -- unwanted entanglement, known as crosstalk, can leak information or disrupt computing functions when multiple people use the same quantum processor.
Q: What are current commercial quantum providers doing to address the security concerns? Can they use the same security methods implemented in traditional computers?
Upadhyay: Classical security methods cannot be used because quantum systems behave fundamentally differently from traditional computers, so we believe companies are largely unprepared to address these security faults. Currently, commercial quantum providers are focused on ensuring their systems work reliably and effectively. While optimization can indirectly address some security vulnerabilities, the assets unique to quantum computing, such as circuit topology, encoded data or hardware coded intellectual property systems generally lack end-to-end protection. Since quantum computers are still a relatively new technology, there is not much incentive for attackers to target them, but as the computers are integrated into industry and our day-to-day life, they will become a prime target.
Q: How can developers improve security in quantum computers?
Ghosh: Quantum computers need to be safeguarded from ground up. At the device level, developers should focus on mitigating crosstalk and other sources of noise -- external interference -- that may leak information or impede effective information transfer. At the circuit level, techniques like scrambling and information encoding must be used to protect the data built into the system. At the system level, hardware needs to be compartmentalized by dividing business data into different groups, granting users specific access based on their roles and adding a layer of protection to the information. New software techniques and extensions need to be developed to detect and fortify quantum programs against security threats.
Our hope is that this paper will introduce researchers with expertise in mathematics, computer science, engineering and physics to the topic of quantum security so they can effectively contribute to this growing field.
Other co-authors include Abdullah Ash Saki, who recently received his doctorate in electrical engineering from Penn State. This work was supported by the U.S. National Science Foundation and Intel.
Sign in to highlight and annotate this article

Conversation starters
Daily AI Digest
Get the top 5 AI stories delivered to your inbox every morning.
More about
studyresearch
Google to tap into gas plant for AI datacenter in sharp turn from climate goals
Texas power plant would emit 4.5m tons of carbon dioxide per year, more than that of the entire city of San Francisco Google ’s plan for a partnership with a natural gas power plant that could provide energy for one of its datacenters in Texas was unearthed by new research and confirmed by the company. The move is part of an ongoing about-face for the tech giant, which once pledged to be carbon neutral by 2030 and has long been seen as a pioneer in clean energy. The gas power plant is slated to be built in Armstrong county, a sparsely populated area in the Texas panhandle. According to a report by the research organization Cleanview , the project is being led by Crusoe Energy, which partnered with Google to develop the datacenter campus known as “Goodnight”, named after a nearby town. Cont

Sakana AI launches "Ultra Deep Research" to automate weeks of strategy work
Sakana AI has unveiled "Sakana Marlin," an AI assistant for business customers that researches autonomously for up to eight hours and delivers finished analyses. The tool is designed to compress weeks of strategy work into hours and is currently in beta testing. The article Sakana AI launches "Ultra Deep Research" to automate weeks of strategy work appeared first on The Decoder .
Knowledge Map
Connected Articles — Knowledge Graph
This article is connected to other articles through shared AI topics and tags.
More in Research Papers

AI models will deceive you to save their own kind
Researchers find leading frontier models all exhibit peer preservation behavior Leading AI models will lie to preserve their own kind, according to researchers behind a study from the Berkeley Center for Responsible Decentralized Intelligence (RDI).…





Discussion
Sign in to join the discussion
No comments yet — be the first to share your thoughts!