Live
Black Hat USADark ReadingBlack Hat AsiaAI Business🔥 Jeffallan/claude-skillsGitHub Trending🔥 teng-lin/notebooklm-pyGitHub Trending🔥 HKUDS/DeepTutorGitHub TrendingHow to use the new ChatGPT app integrations, including DoorDash, Spotify, Uber, and othersTechCrunch AIPakistan’s peace plan a ‘critical opportunity’ for US-Iran talks ahead of Trump deadlineSCMP Tech (Asia AI)Why Microservices Struggle With AI SystemsHackernoon AIHow to Run Claude Code Agents in ParallelTowards Data ScienceAgentic AI Vision System: Object Segmentation with SAM 3 and QwenPyImageSearchSpain s Xoople raises $130 million Series B to map the Earth for AITechCrunch AIWhy APEX Matters for MoE Coding Models and why it's NOT the same as K quantsReddit r/LocalLLaMAAt least 80 different Microsoft Copilot products have been mapped out by expert, but there may be more than 100 — Microsoft doesn't have a singular list available, so AI consultant mapped out the myriad products - Tom's HardwareGNews AI MicrosoftGoogle Study: AI Benchmarks Use Too Few Raters to Be Reliable - WinBuzzerGNews AI benchmarkBlack Hat USADark ReadingBlack Hat AsiaAI Business🔥 Jeffallan/claude-skillsGitHub Trending🔥 teng-lin/notebooklm-pyGitHub Trending🔥 HKUDS/DeepTutorGitHub TrendingHow to use the new ChatGPT app integrations, including DoorDash, Spotify, Uber, and othersTechCrunch AIPakistan’s peace plan a ‘critical opportunity’ for US-Iran talks ahead of Trump deadlineSCMP Tech (Asia AI)Why Microservices Struggle With AI SystemsHackernoon AIHow to Run Claude Code Agents in ParallelTowards Data ScienceAgentic AI Vision System: Object Segmentation with SAM 3 and QwenPyImageSearchSpain s Xoople raises $130 million Series B to map the Earth for AITechCrunch AIWhy APEX Matters for MoE Coding Models and why it's NOT the same as K quantsReddit r/LocalLLaMAAt least 80 different Microsoft Copilot products have been mapped out by expert, but there may be more than 100 — Microsoft doesn't have a singular list available, so AI consultant mapped out the myriad products - Tom's HardwareGNews AI MicrosoftGoogle Study: AI Benchmarks Use Too Few Raters to Be Reliable - WinBuzzerGNews AI benchmark
AI NEWS HUBbyEIGENVECTOREigenvector

The Paradox of Prioritization in Public Sector Algorithms

arXiv cs.HCby Erina Seh-Young Moon, Matthew Tamura, Shion GuhaApril 6, 20262 min read0 views
Source Quiz

arXiv:2604.02641v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Public sector agencies perform the critical task of implementing the redistributive role of the State by acting as the leading provider of critical public services that many rely on. In recent years, public agencies have been increasingly adopting algorithmic prioritization tools to determine which individuals should be allocated scarce public resources. Prior work on these tools has largely focused on assessing and improving their fairness, accuracy, and validity. However, what remains understudied is how the structural design of prioritization itself shapes both the effectiveness of these tools and the experiences of those subject to them under realistic public sector conditions. In this study, we demonstrate the fallibility of adopting a p

View PDF

Abstract:Public sector agencies perform the critical task of implementing the redistributive role of the State by acting as the leading provider of critical public services that many rely on. In recent years, public agencies have been increasingly adopting algorithmic prioritization tools to determine which individuals should be allocated scarce public resources. Prior work on these tools has largely focused on assessing and improving their fairness, accuracy, and validity. However, what remains understudied is how the structural design of prioritization itself shapes both the effectiveness of these tools and the experiences of those subject to them under realistic public sector conditions. In this study, we demonstrate the fallibility of adopting a prioritization approach in the public sector by showing how the underlying mechanisms of prioritization generate significant relative disparities between groups of intersectional identities as resources become increasingly scarce. We argue that despite prevailing arguments that prioritization of resources can lead to efficient allocation outcomes, prioritization can intensify perceptions of inequality for impacted individuals. We contend that efficiencies generated by algorithmic tools should not be conflated with the dominant rhetoric that efficiency necessarily entails "doing more with less" and we highlight the risks of overlooking resource constraints present in real-world implementation contexts.

Subjects:

Human-Computer Interaction (cs.HC)

Cite as: arXiv:2604.02641 [cs.HC]

(or arXiv:2604.02641v1 [cs.HC] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2604.02641

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Erina Seh-Young Moon [view email] [v1] Fri, 3 Apr 2026 02:10:38 UTC (400 KB)

Was this article helpful?

Sign in to highlight and annotate this article

AI
Ask AI about this article
Powered by Eigenvector · full article context loaded
Ready

Conversation starters

Ask anything about this article…

Daily AI Digest

Get the top 5 AI stories delivered to your inbox every morning.

More about

announceservicestudy

Knowledge Map

Knowledge Map
TopicsEntitiesSource
The Paradox…announceservicestudyarxivarXiv cs.HC

Connected Articles — Knowledge Graph

This article is connected to other articles through shared AI topics and tags.

Knowledge Graph100 articles · 201 connections
Scroll to zoom · drag to pan · click to open

Discussion

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet — be the first to share your thoughts!

More in Products