SentinelAgent: Intent-Verified Delegation Chains for Securing Federal Multi-Agent AI Systems
arXiv:2604.02767v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: When Agent A delegates to Agent B, which invokes Tool C on behalf of User X, no existing framework can answer: whose authorization chain led to this action, and where did it violate policy? This paper introduces SentinelAgent, a formal framework for verifiable delegation chains in federal multi-agent AI systems. The Delegation Chain Calculus (DCC) defines seven properties - six deterministic (authority narrowing, policy preservation, forensic reconstructibility, cascade containment, scope-action conformance, output schema conformance) and one probabilistic (intent preservation) - with four meta-theorems and one proposition establishing the practical infeasibility of deterministic intent verification. The Intent-Preserving Delegation Protoco
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:When Agent A delegates to Agent B, which invokes Tool C on behalf of User X, no existing framework can answer: whose authorization chain led to this action, and where did it violate policy? This paper introduces SentinelAgent, a formal framework for verifiable delegation chains in federal multi-agent AI systems. The Delegation Chain Calculus (DCC) defines seven properties - six deterministic (authority narrowing, policy preservation, forensic reconstructibility, cascade containment, scope-action conformance, output schema conformance) and one probabilistic (intent preservation) - with four meta-theorems and one proposition establishing the practical infeasibility of deterministic intent verification. The Intent-Preserving Delegation Protocol (IPDP) enforces all seven properties at runtime through a non-LLM Delegation Authority Service. A three-point verification lifecycle achieves 100% combined TPR at 0% FPR on DelegationBench v4 (516 scenarios, 10 attack categories, 13 federal domains). Under black-box adversarial conditions, the DAS blocks 30/30 attacks with 0 false positives. Deterministic properties are unbreakable under adversarial stress testing; intent verification degrades to 13% against sophisticated paraphrasing. Fine-tuning the NLI model on 190 government delegation examples improves P2 from 1.7% to 88.3% TPR (5-fold cross-validated, F1=82.1%). Properties P1, P3-P7 are mechanically verified via TLA+ model checking across 2.7 million states with zero violations. Even when intent verification is evaded, the remaining six properties constrain the adversary to permitted API calls, conformant outputs, traceable actions, bounded cascades, and compliant behavior.
Comments: 12 pages, 2 figures, 9 tables. Includes TLA+ mechanical verification, DelegationBench v4 benchmark (516 scenarios), live LangChain agent integration, and independent red-team evaluation
Subjects:
Cryptography and Security (cs.CR); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Multiagent Systems (cs.MA)
Cite as: arXiv:2604.02767 [cs.CR]
(or arXiv:2604.02767v1 [cs.CR] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2604.02767
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
Submission history
From: KrishnaSaiReddy Patil [view email] [v1] Fri, 3 Apr 2026 06:25:18 UTC (27 KB)
Sign in to highlight and annotate this article

Conversation starters
Daily AI Digest
Get the top 5 AI stories delivered to your inbox every morning.
More about
modelannounceservice

Cloud AI subscriptions are getting desperate with retention. honestly makes me want to go more local
Ok so two things happened this week that made me appreciate my local setup way more tried to cancel cursor ($200/mo ultra plan) and they instantly threw 50% off at me before I could even confirm. no survey, no exit flow, just straight to "please stay." thats not confidence lol then claude (im on the $100/mo pro plan) started giving me free API calls. 100 one day, 100 the next day. no email about it, no announcement, just free compute showing up. very "please dont leave" energy their core customers are software engineers and... we're getting laid off in waves. 90k+ tech jobs gone this year. every layoff = cancelled subscription. makes sense the retention is getting aggresive meanwhile my qwen 3.5 27B on my 5060 Ti doesnt give a shit about the economy. no monthly fee. no retention emails. no
Knowledge Map
Connected Articles — Knowledge Graph
This article is connected to other articles through shared AI topics and tags.
More in Models

kv-cache : support attention rotation for heterogeneous iSWA by ggerganov · Pull Request #21513 · ggml-org/llama.cpp
tl;dr: Fixes KV-cache rotation for hybrid-attention models like Gemma 4 (Not actually TurboQuant, but you can call it TurboQuant if that makes you feel better) submitted by /u/jacek2023 [link] [comments]



Discussion
Sign in to join the discussion
No comments yet — be the first to share your thoughts!