Prompts you use to test/trip up your LLMs
I'm obsessed with finding prompts to test the quality of different local models. I've pretty much landed on several that I use across the board. Tell me about the Apple A6 (a pass is if it mentions Apple made their own microarchitecture called swift for the CPU cores, the main thing that the A6 is historically known for as the first Apple SOC to do it. This tests if it is smart enough to mention historically relevant information first) Tell me about the history of Phoenix's freeway network (A pass is if it gives a historical narration instead of just listing freeways. We asked for history, after all. Again, testing for its understanding of putting relevant information first.) Tell me about the Pentium D. Why was it a bad processor ( A pass is it it mentions that it glued two separate penti
Could not retrieve the full article text.
Read on Reddit r/LocalLLaMA →Reddit r/LocalLLaMA
https://www.reddit.com/r/LocalLLaMA/comments/1sdmm7g/prompts_you_use_to_testtrip_up_your_llms/Sign in to highlight and annotate this article
Conversation starters
Daily AI Digest
Get the top 5 AI stories delivered to your inbox every morning.
More about
modeltrainingnew model
Common Mistakes to Avoid When Hiring a Custom Software Development Company
In today’s competitive digital landscape, businesses increasingly rely on tailored solutions to streamline operations and drive growth. However, the process of selecting the right partner for building unique applications can be challenging. Many organisations make critical errors that lead to budget overruns, delayed launches, and disappointing results. This detailed guide highlights the most common mistakes businesses commit when engaging a development partner and provides practical advice to help you avoid them. Failing to Define Clear Project Requirements One of the primary reasons projects fail is the lack of well-documented requirements at the beginning. Companies often approach potential partners with only a vague idea of what they need, expecting the experts to fill in the gaps. Thi
Interloom Raised $16.5M for Agent Memory — Here's the Indie Alternative
Interloom just closed a $16.5M seed round for "operational memory in AI agents." If you're running autonomous agents in production, this matters — not because of Interloom specifically, but because it validates what practitioners have known for months: memory is the infrastructure layer that makes or breaks production agents. The era of stateless, context-window-only agents is over. Anyone running agents past week 2 has hit the wall: the agent forgets what it learned, acts on stale information, or bloats its context window until performance craters. $16.5M says the market agrees. The Problem Everyone Hits Every autonomous agent — whether it's running customer support, managing operations, or orchestrating workflows — faces the same fundamental challenge: memory trust . An agent that confid
Knowledge Map
Connected Articles — Knowledge Graph
This article is connected to other articles through shared AI topics and tags.
More in Models
Три месяца я использовал Cursor неправильно. Вот как надо.
14 февраля, 23:40. Я сижу перед ноутбуком, пытаясь закрыть дашборд за $1200 . В панике копирую огромные блоки кода в Cursor и требую "почини это". Ответы - мусор. Пытаюсь снова и снова, но проходит три часа, а проблема не решается. Наутро, случайно выделив маленькую функцию из 12 строк и добавив точный контекст, я получаю решение за 40 секунд . Понимание пришло слишком поздно - Cursor, как и любой AI, требует точности. Почему мне было больно Cursor казался мне волшебной палочкой, но на практике это было как попытка открыть замок набором случайных ключей. Когда я копировал целые файлы по 400 строк , он терялся и выдавал бессмысленный код. Было обидно терять часы на правки, которые никто не оплачивает. Этот опыт знаком многим, кто использует AI для кода. Хотим получить решения мгновенно, но
Dynamic Languages Faster and Cheaper in 13-Language Claude Code Benchmark
A 600-run benchmark by Ruby committer Yusuke Endoh tested Claude Code across 13 languages, implementing a simplified Git. Ruby, Python, and JavaScript were the fastest and cheapest, at $0.36- $0.39 per run. Statistically typed languages cost 1.4-2.6x more. Adding type checkers to dynamic languages imposed 1.6-3.2x slowdowns. Full dataset available on GitHub. By Steef-Jan Wiggers
Discussion
Sign in to join the discussion
No comments yet — be the first to share your thoughts!