New findings show how hands-on support can improve water sector cybersecurity
Cyber threats to water systems are no longer hypothetical. When attacks succeed, communities can face loss of trust, safety concerns, or service disruptions. Today, Microsoft, in collaboration with the Cyber Readiness Institute (CRI) and the Center on Cyber Technology and Innovation (CCTI), is releasing a report that examines both the urgency of this challenge and... The post New findings show how hands-on support can improve water sector cybersecurity appeared first on Microsoft On the Issues .
Cyber threats to water systems are no longer hypothetical. When attacks succeed, communities can face loss of trust, safety concerns, or service disruptions.
Today, Microsoft, in collaboration with the Cyber Readiness Institute (CRI) and the Center on Cyber Technology and Innovation (CCTI), is releasing a report that examines both the urgency of this challenge and what it will take to close the cyber readiness gap in the water sector. The report draws on a pilot program that provided water and wastewater utilities with practical cybersecurity training paired with hands‑on coaching, testing whether real-world support can meaningfully improve cyber readiness.
The findings point to a clear conclusion: improving cyber resilience in the water sector is achievable when training is paired with hands-on support and delivered through trusted sector partners. Because of the success of this pilot, the program is now a permanent offering, giving water utilities continued access to practical training and support to strengthen cyber resilience and better protect their communities from evolving threats.
Why cyber resilience in the water sector matters now
Water and wastewater utilities underpin public health, economic activity, and community resilience across all critical infrastructure. Yet recent assessments from the U.S. intelligence community and public reporting on cyber incidents underscore how exposed many systems remain. Even larger, well-resourced utilities have experienced cyber incidents, highlighting vulnerabilities that are far more pronounced among smaller operators serving rural and underserved communities.
Awareness of cyber risk is growing, but awareness is not preparedness. The challenge is how to move from growing awareness to sustained, operational readiness, especially for utilities with limited time, funding, and technical capacity.
What the pilot set out to test and what it showed
The CRI pilot was designed to answer a practical question facing the water sector: can accessible, behavior‑focused cybersecurity training paired with hands‑on support meaningfully improve cyber readiness?
Participating utilities used CRI’s free Cyber Readiness Program, which focuses on core cybersecurity practices such as strong authentication, software updates, phishing awareness, and secure data handling. Utilities also had access to CRI Certified Cyber Coaches, who worked directly with designated “Cyber Leaders” inside utilities to help translate training into policies, playbooks, and incident response planning. This model paired accessible training with personalized support to help utilities make meaningful progress despite resource constraints. The pilot revealed three clear findings about what helps and what limits cyber readiness in the water sector.
-
CRI program improves readiness: Participating utilities reported stronger cybersecurity fundamentals, greater confidence responding to incidents, and the identification of previously undocumented, yet critical, gaps such as missing continuity plans and weak password practices.
-
Hands-on support accelerates success: Utilities paired with a CRI‑certified coach were significantly more likely to complete the program than those participating on a self‑paced basis.
-
Demand exceeds capacity: While interest in cybersecurity support is high, staffing shortages, limited funding, and dependence on third-party vendors continue to limit utilities’ ability to fully implement improvements. Participation data helps explain this finding: of the 113 utilities that expressed initial interest, 72 began the program and 43 completed it.
Implications for policymakers and the ecosystem
The findings point to a central takeaway for policymakers and the ecosystem: improving cybersecurity outcomes requires moving beyond sharing information to providing hands-on support that helps utilities implement and sustain change.
-
Free resources are necessary but not enough: No-cost guidance alone cannot overcome staffing and funding constraints. Effective programs must include implementation support, like cyber coaches, to drive real outcomes.
-
Incentives increase participation: Tying cybersecurity training to operator licensing or continuing education requirements helps embed cyber readiness into routine professional development.
-
Trusted messengers drive engagement: Participation and completion were highest when programs were facilitated through established sector associations and networks that utilities already trust.
A path forward through collaboration
The lesson from this pilot is clear: cyber readiness improves when training is paired with hands‑on support and facilitated through trusted partners. But the findings also underscore a broader reality: lasting progress will require moving beyond information sharing toward approaches that build real, sustained capacity building on the ground.
At Microsoft, this work reflects a practical commitment to supporting cyber resilience across critical infrastructure, helping to move from awareness to action. Addressing the challenges identified in this report will require continued collaboration among policymakers, sector associations, nonprofits, and the private sector.
This work also complements Microsoft’s broader commitment to be water positive, including minimizing our water use and replenishing more water than we consume[1][2], by helping strengthen the resilience of the water systems and utilities that serve communities. Supporting practical cyber readiness is one way we can contribute to more resilient water systems for the future.
[1] Sustainability | Microsoft
[2] Building Community-First AI Infrastructure – Microsoft On the Issues
Tags: cybersecurity, Microsoft, sustainability
blogs.microsoft.com
https://blogs.microsoft.com/on-the-issues/2026/03/19/how-hands-on-support-can-improve-water-sector-cybersecurity/Sign in to highlight and annotate this article

Conversation starters
Daily AI Digest
Get the top 5 AI stories delivered to your inbox every morning.
Knowledge Map
Connected Articles — Knowledge Graph
This article is connected to other articles through shared AI topics and tags.
More in Products

Automating Repetitive Tasks with Workany
Automating the Mundane: An Introduction to Workany Are you tired of the endless cycle of repetitive computer tasks? The constant clicking, copying, and setup procedures can drain your energy and detract from more impactful work. What if you could simply articulate your needs to your computer, and it would autonomously execute the required steps? This is the compelling proposition of Workany. The Promise of Workany Workany is an open-source initiative dedicated to revolutionizing how we approach digital workflows. Its core mission is to automate tedious and repetitive tasks, allowing users to reallocate their cognitive resources towards innovation, strategy, and complex problem-solving. By integrating AI-driven capabilities, Workany aims to create a more seamless and efficient interaction w

AI Code Review Is the New Bottleneck: Why Faster Code Is Not Reaching Production Faster
A developer on my team opened eleven pull requests last Tuesday. Eleven. In a single day. Two years ago, that same developer averaged two or three PRs per week. The difference is not that he suddenly became five times more productive. The difference is Claude Code. He describes a feature, the agent implements it, he reviews the diff, and he opens the PR. The code-writing part of his job accelerated by an order of magnitude. The problem is what happened next. Those eleven PRs sat in review for an average of four days. Three of them took over a week. By the time the last one was approved and merged, the branch had conflicts with main that took another hour to resolve. He shipped more code than ever. The code reached production at roughly the same pace as before. And the two senior engineers

Intelligence vs. Orchestration: Why Coordination Alone Can't Run a Business
If you've spent any time building with AI agents, you've probably reached for an orchestration framework. You've given agents roles, wired up task routing, maybe even added a budget governor. And for a while, it felt like you were building something real — a system that could operate autonomously, make decisions, get things done. Then you ran it on Monday morning, and it was like the entire team had amnesia. This is the ceiling that every technical founder and CTO eventually hits with agent orchestration. Not because the frameworks are bad — they're not. Paperclip, CrewAI, LangGraph, AutoGen: these are serious engineering efforts solving genuinely hard coordination problems. Paperclip has 33,000 GitHub stars for a reason. CrewAI earns its reputation as a leading multi-agent platform. LangG






Discussion
Sign in to join the discussion
No comments yet — be the first to share your thoughts!