NC ad campaign calls for AI regulations to ‘protect what’s human’ - Cardinal & Pine
<a href="https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMioAFBVV95cUxQN3A3T1RRUk40SjFta25GMkJSM1VPNXhiTHJoLWVSRlFLOWxhRnNTOGZidEFtbllfNjVTNndhQzFvNmU1UzQzcXBDbEhKWTFCZ2NVU3BCeUhobExnakx0V3dmTEJILTNfSzhUUnlncmF5R0E5WHZSSXVNTFdDM2IyVzV6RGxkUVdtTmxCMzJpYnc5MlJWT05zSlc0ai1VTkty?oc=5" target="_blank">NC ad campaign calls for AI regulations to ‘protect what’s human’</a> <font color="#6f6f6f">Cardinal & Pine</font>
Could not retrieve the full article text.
Read on GNews AI regulation →Sign in to highlight and annotate this article
Conversation starters
Daily AI Digest
Get the top 5 AI stories delivered to your inbox every morning.
More about
regulation
By Strong Default, ASI Will End Liberal Democracy
Cross-posted from my website . The existence of liberal democracy—with rule of law, constraints on government power, and enfranchised citizens—relies on a balance of power where individual bad actors can't do too much damage. Artificial superintelligence (ASI), even if it's aligned, would end that balance by default. It is not a question of who develops ASI. Whether the first ASI is developed by a totalitarian state or a democracy, the end result will—by strong default—be a de facto global dictatorship. The central problem is that whoever controls ASI can defeat any opposition. Imagine a scenario where (say) DARPA develops the first superintelligence [1] , and the head of the ASI training program decides to seize power. What can anyone do about it? If the president orders the military to c
Knowledge Map
Connected Articles — Knowledge Graph
This article is connected to other articles through shared AI topics and tags.
More in Laws & Regulation
OpenAI’s Guide to Building an Open Economy and Resilient Society
OpenAI has proposed new industrial policy guidelines which it suggests will help governments manage the disruption caused by AI. In the report titled Industrial Policy for the Intelligence Age: Ideas to Keep People First, Open AI highlights their ideas for policy change, but notes that real change requires broader collaboration to ensure superintelligence can benefit [ ] The post OpenAI’s Guide to Building an Open Economy and Resilient Society appeared first on DIGIT .
By Strong Default, ASI Will End Liberal Democracy
Cross-posted from my website . The existence of liberal democracy—with rule of law, constraints on government power, and enfranchised citizens—relies on a balance of power where individual bad actors can't do too much damage. Artificial superintelligence (ASI), even if it's aligned, would end that balance by default. It is not a question of who develops ASI. Whether the first ASI is developed by a totalitarian state or a democracy, the end result will—by strong default—be a de facto global dictatorship. The central problem is that whoever controls ASI can defeat any opposition. Imagine a scenario where (say) DARPA develops the first superintelligence [1] , and the head of the ASI training program decides to seize power. What can anyone do about it? If the president orders the military to c
Discussion
Sign in to join the discussion
No comments yet — be the first to share your thoughts!