Most complex time crystal yet has been made inside a quantum computer
Using a superconducting quantum computer, physicists created a large and complex version of an odd quantum material that has a repeating structure in time
The IBM Quantum System Two, which is similar to the machine used to make the new time crystal
IBM Research
A time crystal more complex than any made before has been created in a quantum computer. Exploring the properties of this unusual quantum setup strengthens the case for quantum computers as machines well-suited for scientific discovery.
Typical crystals have atoms arranged in a specific repeating pattern in space, but time crystals are defined by a pattern that repeats in time instead. A time crystal repeatedly cycles through the same set of configurations and, barring deleterious influences from its environment, should continue cycling indefinitely.
This indefinite motion initially made time crystals seem like a threat to the fundamental laws of physics, but throughout the past decade researchers have made several of them in the lab. Now, Nicolás Lorente at Donostia International Physics Center in Spain and his colleagues have used an IBM superconducting quantum computer to make an unprecedentedly complex time crystal.
While most past studies focused on one-dimensional time crystals, which can be compared to a neat line of atoms, the researchers set out to create a two-dimensional version. To that end, they used 144 superconducting qubits arranged in an interlocking pattern roughly like a honeycomb. Each qubit played the role of a particle with quantum mechanical spin, which is a key component of quantum materials such as magnets, and the team could control how nearby qubits interacted with each other.
Varying these interactions over time is what gave rise to the time crystal, but the researchers could also program the interactions to have a particularly pattern of strengths.
Being able to reach this new level of complexity allowed the team not only to create a time crystal more complex than any produced with a quantum computer before now, but also to start mapping out the features of the whole qubit system to obtain its “phase diagram” – a map that shows all the possible states the system can take. Completing a phase diagram is an important step for understanding the properties of a material – a phase diagram of water, for instance, reveals whether the water is liquid, solid or gas at a given temperature and pressure.
Jamie Garcia at IBM, who wasn’t involved in the research, says this experiment may be the first in many steps that could eventually lead to quantum computers helping to design new materials based on a fuller picture of all the possible properties a quantum system can have, including those as odd as time crystals.
The equations that the researchers used as a blueprint for making the time crystal and to begin constructing its phase diagram were already complicated enough that conventional computers can’t use them for simulations without having to make approximations. At the same time, all existing quantum computers suffer from errors, so the researchers had to use those conventional methods to estimate where the quantum computer’s work, such as the phase diagram, may become unreliable. This back-and-forth between approximate conventional methods and exact but error-prone quantum approaches could sharpen our understanding of many complex quantum models for materials going forward, says Garcia.
“Two-dimensional systems are practically very challenging to simulate numerically, so the large-scale quantum simulation with more than 100 qubits should provide an anchor point for future research,” says Biao Huang at the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences. He says that the new study represents exciting experimental progress for several areas of study into quantum matter. Specifically, it could help connect time crystals, which can be simulated on quantum computers, to similar states that can be created in some types of quantum sensors, says Huang.
Topics:
Sign in to highlight and annotate this article

Conversation starters
Daily AI Digest
Get the top 5 AI stories delivered to your inbox every morning.
More about
version
I built an npm middleware that scores your LLM prompts before they hit your agent workflow
The problem with most LLM agent workflows is that nobody is checking the quality of the prompts going in. Garbage in, garbage out but at scale, with agents firing hundreds of prompts per day, the garbage compounds fast. I built x402-pqs to fix this. It's an Express middleware that intercepts prompts before they hit any LLM endpoint, scores them for quality, and adds the score to the request headers. Install npm install x402-pqs Usage const express = require ( " express " ); const { pqsMiddleware } = require ( " x402-pqs " ); const app = express (); app . use ( express . json ()); app . use ( pqsMiddleware ({ threshold : 10 , // warn if prompt scores below 10/40 vertical : " crypto " , // scoring context onLowScore : " warn " , // warn | block | ignore })); app . post ( " /api/chat " , ( re

Roborock Saros 20 vs Saros 10R: 36,000 Pa suction dominates but Sonic version looms
Roborock Saros 20 Crushes the Competition with Record 36,000 Pa Suction — But Is It Enough? Roborock has once again raised the bar in the robot vacuum market with the launch of its 2026 Saros 20, delivering an unprecedented 36,000 Pa of suction power—the highest ever seen in a consumer robot vacuum. Positioned as the direct successor to the Saros 10R, the Saros 20 not only boasts record-breaking cleaning strength but also introduces significant hardware and mobility upgrades, including the innovative AdaptiLift Chassis 3.0. With a launch date set for March 23 and a price tag of $1,599.99, Roborock is clearly targeting the premium segment with this powerhouse. However, with rumors of an even more advanced Sonic version on the horizon, the question remains: is the Saros 20 the ultimate clean

We tested structured ontology vs Markdown+RAG for AI agents — "why?" recall was 0% vs 100%
Our AI agent knew the company uses Provider A for identity verification. It could name the provider, list the integration specs, recite the timeline. Then we asked why Provider A was chosen over Provider B. The agent couldn't answer. Not once across 24 attempts. Zero percent recall on reasoning questions. So we built the layer that was missing — and ran 48 controlled experiments to measure the difference. The problem: AI agents can't answer "why?" If you give an AI agent a folder of Markdown docs and let it use RAG to find answers, it handles factual questions well. What modules exist? Who owns this component? When was this decision made? But "why?" is different. Reasoning is rarely stored as a discrete fact. It's spread across meeting notes, scattered through Slack threads, buried in the
Knowledge Map
Connected Articles — Knowledge Graph
This article is connected to other articles through shared AI topics and tags.
More in Releases

Hong Kong’s John Lee pledges to expand after-school care for low-income families
Hong Kong leader John Lee Ka-chiu has promised to allow more children from low-income families to enjoy after-school care on campus by further expanding a government scheme following positive feedback from participants. Social workers and educators welcomed the initiative on Saturday, proposing the government widen the scheme’s coverage to include more pupils and encourage more schools to join through subsidies. The scheme, launched as part of a government’s targeted measures to tackle poverty,...

1 dead in Peru football stadium tragedy, dozens injured
At least one person died and 60 others were injured in what seemed to be a crush of fans at a popular football team’s stadium in the Peruvian capital on Friday night, authorities reported. Police said officers rescued people trapped as a result of an influx of Alianza Lima fans in the south stands of the Alejandro Villanueva Stadium the night before their team’s scheduled game against their biggest rival, Universitario. Earlier, the Ministry of Health had reported the collapse of a wall inside...




Discussion
Sign in to join the discussion
No comments yet — be the first to share your thoughts!