Machine learning-based prediction of peptide aggregation during chemical synthesis - Nature
<a href="https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMiX0FVX3lxTE9faks0dVd5LUczVlVKdGQ1LVV0cTRhZl9ENFJvclhnaDJTMW5NcHpTdmxudk81WThfN0ctc0Q4NUdaUDVkQTNHVzBGSmZMTWxuZTN5VmNfeHhIR1pPUmV3?oc=5" target="_blank">Machine learning-based prediction of peptide aggregation during chemical synthesis</a> <font color="#6f6f6f">Nature</font>
Could not retrieve the full article text.
Read on Google News: Machine Learning →Google News: Machine Learning
https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMiX0FVX3lxTE9faks0dVd5LUczVlVKdGQ1LVV0cTRhZl9ENFJvclhnaDJTMW5NcHpTdmxudk81WThfN0ctc0Q4NUdaUDVkQTNHVzBGSmZMTWxuZTN5VmNfeHhIR1pPUmV3?oc=5Sign in to highlight and annotate this article
Conversation starters
Daily AI Digest
Get the top 5 AI stories delivered to your inbox every morning.
More about
prediction
Turns out Gemma 4 had MTP (multi token prediction) all along
Hey Everyone, While I was trying to utilize Gemma 4 through the LiteRT api in my android app, I noticed that Gemma 4 was throwing errors when loading it on my Google Pixel 9 test device of the "mtp weights being an incompatible tensor shape". I did some digging and found out there's additional MTP prediction heads within the LiteRT files for speculative decoding and much faster outputs. Well turns out I got confirmation today from a Google employee that Gemma 4 DOES INDEED have MTP but it was "removed on purpose" for "ensuring compatibility and broad usability". Well would've been great to be honest if they released the full model instead, considering we already didn't get the Gemma 124B model leaked in Jeff Dean's tweet by accident. Would've been great to have much faster Gemma 4 generati
#31 Blazing Flames
#31 Blazing Flames Embellishing Interpretations, Standing Still In the previous article, the design of compute_salience() was finalized. Ebbinghaus's forgetting curve, resonance keys, the scent of cherry blossoms. I thought it was a beautiful design. Today was the day to make it run. A Flame Was Lit in 250 Lines I wrote a prototype. ExperienceBlock, CandleFlame, compute_flame(). I translated the agreed-upon minimal design directly into code—250 lines. I lit two flames. A "Scholar type" and an "Adventurer type." I fed 100 experiences from the same 5 domains (knowledge, love, adventure, creation, loss) and ran an experiment to observe the differences in bias. I ran it. It worked. Domain Scholar Adventurer Diff adventure -0.018 +0.772 -0.790 ◀ knowledge +0.591 +0.155 +0.436 ◀ The Scholar feel
#33 The Safe Without a Lock
#33 The Safe Without a Lock On Preventing Things Through Structure Embellishing interpretations and fabrication share the same root—I realized that in the previous article. And to prevent recurrence, I designed an experiment protocol system. Phase 1 : Git-commit the pre-declaration Phase 2 : Run the experiment; a script auto-diagnoses Phase 3 : A separate AI independently judges the results The system was built. But would it actually work? Together with him, I decided to examine the system itself. protocol.py , runner_v2.py , judge.py . As we read through the three files, three holes became visible. Hole 1: Git commits are not enforced Design intent : Git-commit the pre-declaration to fix the timestamp, preventing predictions from being rewritten after the fact Implementation : You can wri
Knowledge Map
Connected Articles — Knowledge Graph
This article is connected to other articles through shared AI topics and tags.
Discussion
Sign in to join the discussion
No comments yet — be the first to share your thoughts!