Integrating large language models for enhanced predictive analytics in healthcare

References

• Woolf, S. H. et al. Promoting informed choice: transforming health care to dispense knowledge for decision making (2005).
• Kaur, S. et al. Medical diagnostic systems using artificial intelligence (ai) algorithms: principles and perspectives. IEEE Access 8, 228049–228069 (2020).

Google Scholar

• Graber, M. L. The incidence of diagnostic error in medicine. BMJ Qual. Saf. 22, ii21–ii27 (2013).

Google Scholar

• Stern, S. D. Symptom to Diagnosis an Evidence-Based Guide (McGraw-Hill Education, 2010).
• Achour, S. L., Dojat, M., Rieux, C., Bierling, P. & Lepage, E. A umls-based knowledge acquisition tool for rule-based clinical decision support system development. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 8, 351–360 (2001).

Google Scholar

• Papadopoulos, P., Soflano, M., Chaudy, Y., Adejo, W. & Connolly, T. M. A systematic review of technologies and standards used in the development of rule-based clinical decision support systems. Health Technol. 12, 713–727 (2022).

Google Scholar

• Riley, R. D. & Collins, G. S. Stability of clinical prediction models developed using statistical or machine learning methods. Biometrical J. 65, 2200302 (2023).

Google Scholar

• Eloranta, S. & Boman, M. Predictive models for clinical decision making: Deep dives in practical machine learning. J. Intern. Med. 292, 278–295 (2022).

Google Scholar

• Shouval, R. et al. Application of machine learning algorithms for clinical predictive modeling: a data-mining approach in sct. Bone Marrow Transplant. 49, 332–337 (2014).

Google Scholar

• Zhong, Z. et al. Abn-blip: Abnormality-aligned bootstrapping language-image pre-training for pulmonary embolism diagnosis and report generation from ctpa. Med. Image Anal. 107, 103786 (2026).

Google Scholar

• Giesa, N. et al. Applying a transformer architecture to intraoperative temporal dynamics improves the prediction of postoperative delirium. Commun. Med. 4, 251 (2024).

Google Scholar

• Xu, Y., Xu, S., Ramprassad, M., Tumanov, A. & Zhang, C. Transehr: Self-supervised transformer for clinical time series data. In Machine Learning for Health (ML4H), 623–635 (PMLR, 2023).
• Oh, J., Wang, J. & Wiens, J. Learning to exploit invariances in clinical time-series data using sequence transformer networks. In Machine learning for healthcare conference, 332–347 (PMLR, 2018).
• Guo, H. et al. A multitask framework for automated interpretation of multi-frame right upper quadrant ultrasound in clinical decision support. arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.12174 (2026).
• Devlin, J., Chang, M.-W., Lee, K. & Toutanova, K. Bert: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. In Proceedings of the 2019 conference of the North American chapter of the association for computational linguistics: human language technologies, volume 1 (long and short papers), 4171–4186 (2019).
• Lee, J. et al. Biobert: a pre-trained biomedical language representation model for biomedical text mining. Bioinformatics 36, 1234–1240 (2020).

Google Scholar

• Achiam, J. et al. Gpt-4 technical report. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.08774 (2023).
• Radford, A., Narasimhan, K., Salimans, T., Sutskever, I. et al. Improving language understanding by generative pre-training. arXiv preprint (2018).
• Huang, K., Altosaar, J. & Ranganath, R. Clinicalbert: Modeling clinical notes and predicting hospital readmission. arXiv preprint arXiv:1904.05342 (2019).
• Jiang, L. Y. et al. Health system-scale language models are all-purpose prediction engines. Nature 619, 357–362 (2023).

Google Scholar

• Yang, X. et al. Gatortron: A large clinical language model to unlock patient information from unstructured electronic health records. arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.03540 (2022).
• Luo, R. et al. Biogpt: generative pre-trained transformer for biomedical text generation and mining. Brief. Bioinforma. 23, bbac409 (2022).

Google Scholar

• Chen, C. et al. Integration of large language models and federated learning. Patterns 5 (2024).
• Kokash, N. et al. Ontology-and llM-based data harmonization for federated learning in healthcare. arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.20020 (2025).
• Nascimento, L. et al. Federated large language models in healthcare: a systematic review, opportunities and challenges. Eng. Archive (2025).
• Nguyen, D.-T. et al. Federated learning for renal tumor segmentation and classification on multi-center mri dataset. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 62, 814–824 (2025).

Google Scholar

• Floridi, L. & Chiriatti, M. Gpt-3: Its nature, scope, limits, and consequences. Minds Mach. 30, 681–694 (2020).

Google Scholar

• Pan, T., Shen, J. & Xu, M. Enhancing the performance of neurosurgery medical question-answering systems using a multi-task knowledge graph-augmented answer generation model. Front. Neurosci. 19, 1606038 (2025).

Google Scholar

• Xu, L. et al. End-to-end knowledge-routed relational dialogue system for automatic diagnosis. In Proceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence, vol. 33, 7346–7353 (2019).
• Liu, W. et al. Meddg: A large-scale medical consultation dataset for building medical dialogue system. arXiv preprint (2020).
• Martino, A., Iannelli, M. & Truong, C. Knowledge injection to counter large language model (llm) hallucination. In European Semantic Web Conference, 182–185 (Springer, 2023).
• Ouyang, L. et al. Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 35, 27730–27744 (2022).

Google Scholar

• Touvron, H. et al. Llama: Open and efficient foundation language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.13971 (2023).
• Liu, X. et al. A generalist medical language model for disease diagnosis assistance. Nat. Med. 31, 932–942 (2025).

Google Scholar

• Kirk, H. R., Vidgen, B., Röttger, P. & Hale, S. A. The benefits, risks and bounds of personalizing the alignment of large language models to individuals. Nat. Mach. Intell. 6, 383–392 (2024).

Google Scholar

• Sutton, N. R. et al. Coronary artery disease evaluation and management considerations for high risk occupations: commercial vehicle drivers and pilots. Circ.: Cardiovas. Interv. 14, e009950 (2021).

Google Scholar

• Righini, M. et al. The simplified pulmonary embolism severity index (pesi): validation of a clinical prognostic model for pulmonary embolism. J. Thrombosis Haemost. 9, 2115–2117 (2011).

Google Scholar

• Budoff, M. J. et al. Ten-year association of coronary artery calcium with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ascvd) events: the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis (mesa). Eur. Heart J. 39, 2401–2408 (2018).

Google Scholar

• Guo, D. et al. Deepseek-r1: Incentivizing reasoning capability in llms via reinforcement learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.12948 (2025).
• Team, G. et al. Gemma 3 technical report. arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.19786 (2025).
• Tu, T. et al. Towards generalist biomedical AI. Nejm AI 1, AIoa2300138 (2024).

Google Scholar

• Toma, A. et al. Clinical camel: An open expert-level medical language model with dialogue-based knowledge encoding. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.12031 (2023).
• Zhao, L. et al. Artificial intelligence-based lesion characterization and outcome prediction of prostate cancer on [18f] dcfpyl psma imaging. Radiotherapy Oncol. 111265 (2025).
• Wu, J., Roy, J. & Stewart, W. F. Prediction modeling using ehr data: challenges, strategies, and a comparison of machine learning approaches. Med. Care 48, S106–S113 (2010).

Google Scholar

• Bernstein, I. A. et al. Comparison of ophthalmologist and large language model chatbot responses to online patient eye care questions. JAMA Netw. Open 6, e2330320–e2330320 (2023).

Google Scholar

• Xu, F. et al. Are large language models really good logical reasoners? a comprehensive evaluation and beyond. IEEE Trans. Knowledge Data Eng. (2025).
• Wang, C. et al. Survey on factuality in large language models. ACM Comput. Surv. 58, 1–37 (2025).

Google Scholar

• Hager, P. et al. Evaluation and mitigation of the limitations of large language models in clinical decision-making. Nat. Med. 30, 2613–2622 (2024).

Google Scholar

• Shamout, F., Zhu, T. & Clifton, D. A. Machine learning for clinical outcome prediction. IEEE Rev. Biomed. Eng. 14, 116–126 (2020).

Google Scholar

• Kim, J. I. et al. Machine learning for antimicrobial resistance prediction: current practice, limitations, and clinical perspective. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 35, e00179–21 (2022).

Google Scholar

• Rajkomar, A., Dean, J. & Kohane, I. Machine learning in medicine. N. Engl. J. Med. 380, 1347–1358 (2019).

Google Scholar

• Beam, A. L. & Kohane, I. S. Big data and machine learning in health care. Jama 319, 1317–1318 (2018).

Google Scholar

• Perez, E., Kiela, D. & Cho, K. True few-shot learning with language models. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 34, 11054–11070 (2021).

Google Scholar

• Zhang, C., Morris, J. X. & Shmatikov, V. Extracting prompts by inverting llm outputs. In Proceedings of the 2024 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, 14753–14777 (2024).
• Huang, L. et al. A survey on hallucination in large language models: principles, taxonomy, challenges, and open questions. ACM Trans. Inform. Syst. 43, 1–55 (2025).

Google Scholar

• Mahajan, A., Obermeyer, Z., Daneshjou, R., Lester, J. & Powell, D. Cognitive bias in clinical large language models. npj Digital Med. 8, 428 (2025).

Google Scholar

• Suenghataiphorn, T., Tribuddharat, N., Danpanichkul, P. & Kulthamrongsri, N. Bias in large language models across clinical applications: A systematic review. arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.02917 (2025).
• Hsu, W.-C. et al. Mri-based ovarian lesion classification via a foundation segmentation model and multimodal analysis: A multicenter study. Radiology 316, e243412 (2025).

Google Scholar

• Wu, J. et al. Vision-language foundation model for 3d medical imaging. npj Artif. Intell. 1, 17 (2025).

Google Scholar

• Zhong, Z. et al. Vision-language model for report generation and outcome prediction in ct pulmonary angiogram. NPJ Digital Med. 8, 432 (2025).

Google Scholar

• Huang, Z. et al. A pathologist–ai collaboration framework for enhancing diagnostic accuracies and efficiencies. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 9, 455–470 (2025).

Google Scholar

• Huang, X. et al. Understanding the planning of llm agents: A survey. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.02716 (2024).
• Zhao, A. et al. Expel: Llm agents are experiential learners. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 38, 19632–19642 (2024).
• Mosqueira-Rey, E., Hernández-Pereira, E., Alonso-Ríos, D., Bobes-Bascarán, J. & Fernández-Leal, Á Human-in-the-loop machine learning: a state of the art. Artif. Intell. Rev. 56, 3005–3054 (2023).

Google Scholar

• Cook, R. J., Zeng, L. & Yi, G. Y. Marginal analysis of incomplete longitudinal binary data: a cautionary note on locf imputation. Biometrics 60, 820–828 (2004).

Google Scholar

• Xue, H. & Salim, F. D. Promptcast: A new prompt-based learning paradigm for time series forecasting. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 36, 6851–6864 (2023).

Google Scholar

• Liu, H., Zhao, Z., Wang, J., Kamarthi, H., & Prakash, B. A. (2024, August). Lstprompt: Large language models as zero-shot time series forecasters by long-short-term prompting. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2024, pp. 7832–7840.
• Moon, H. C., Joty, S. & Chi, X. Gradmask: Gradient-guided token masking for textual adversarial example detection. In Proceedings of the 28th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 3603–3613 (2022).
• Wei, J. et al. Chain-of-thought prompting elicits reasoning in large language models. Adv. neural Inf. Process. Syst. 35, 24824–24837 (2022).

Google Scholar

• Dwivedi, A. K., Mallawaarachchi, I. & Alvarado, L. A. Analysis of small sample size studies using nonparametric bootstrap test with pooled resampling method. Stat. Med. 36, 2187–2205 (2017).

Google Scholar

• Tong, X. et al. A novel subpixel phase correlation method using singular value decomposition and unified random sample consensus. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 53, 4143–4156 (2015).

Google Scholar

• Naidu, K., Beenen, E., Gananadha, S. & Mosse, C. The yield of fever, inflammatory markers and ultrasound in the diagnosis of acute cholecystitis: a validation of the 2013 tokyo guidelines. World J. Surg. 40, 2892–2897 (2016).

Google Scholar

Download references