Improving Generalization of Deep Learning for Brain Metastases Segmentation Across Institutions
arXiv:2604.00397v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Background: Deep learning has demonstrated significant potential for automated brain metastases (BM) segmentation; however, models trained at a singular institution often exhibit suboptimal performance at various sites due to disparities in scanner hardware, imaging protocols, and patient demographics. The goal of this work is to create a domain adaptation framework that will allow for BM segmentation to be used across multiple institutions. Methods: We propose a VAE-MMD preprocessing pipeline that combines variational autoencoders (VAE) with maximum mean discrepancy (MMD) loss, incorporating skip connections and self-attention mechanisms alongside nnU-Net segmentation. The method was tested on 740 patients from four public databases: Stanfor
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Background: Deep learning has demonstrated significant potential for automated brain metastases (BM) segmentation; however, models trained at a singular institution often exhibit suboptimal performance at various sites due to disparities in scanner hardware, imaging protocols, and patient demographics. The goal of this work is to create a domain adaptation framework that will allow for BM segmentation to be used across multiple institutions. Methods: We propose a VAE-MMD preprocessing pipeline that combines variational autoencoders (VAE) with maximum mean discrepancy (MMD) loss, incorporating skip connections and self-attention mechanisms alongside nnU-Net segmentation. The method was tested on 740 patients from four public databases: Stanford, UCSF, UCLM, and PKG, evaluated by domain classifier's accuracy, sensitivity, precision, F1/F2 scores, surface Dice (sDice), and 95th percentile Hausdorff distance (HD95). Results: VAE-MMD reduced domain classifier accuracy from 0.91 to 0.50, indicating successful feature alignment across institutions. Reconstructed volumes attained a PSNR greater than 36 dB, maintaining anatomical accuracy. The combined method raised the mean F1 by 11.1% (0.700 to 0.778), the mean sDice by 7.93% (0.7121 to 0.7686), and reduced the mean HD95 by 65.5% (11.33 to 3.91 mm) across all four centers compared to the baseline nnU-Net. Conclusions: VAE-MMD effectively diminishes cross-institutional data heterogeneity and enhances BM segmentation generalization across volumetric, detection, and boundary-level metrics without necessitating target-domain labels, thereby overcoming a significant obstacle to the clinical implementation of AI-assisted segmentation.
Comments: 5 figures and 1 table
Subjects:
Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
Cite as: arXiv:2604.00397 [cs.CV]
(or arXiv:2604.00397v1 [cs.CV] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2604.00397
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
Submission history
From: Yixing Huang [view email] [v1] Wed, 1 Apr 2026 02:25:25 UTC (5,330 KB)
Sign in to highlight and annotate this article
Conversation starters
Daily AI Digest
Get the top 5 AI stories delivered to your inbox every morning.
More about
modelannouncefeature
Multi-fidelity approaches for general constrained Bayesian optimization with application to aircraft design
Aircraft design relies heavily on solving challenging and computationally expensive Multidisciplinary Design Optimization problems. In this context, there has been growing interest in multi-fidelity models for Bayesian optimization to improve the MDO process by balancing computational cost and accuracy through the combination of high- and low-fidelity simulation models, enabling efficient exploration of the design process at a minimal computational effort. In the existing literature, fidelity selection focuses only on the objective function to decide how to integrate multiple fidelity levels, — Oihan Cordelier, Youssef Diouane, Nathalie Bartoli
Transfer Learning in Bayesian Optimization for Aircraft Design
The use of transfer learning within Bayesian optimization addresses the disadvantages of the so-called \textit{cold start} problem by using source data to aid in the optimization of a target problem. We present a method that leverages an ensemble of surrogate models using transfer learning and integrates it in a constrained Bayesian optimization framework. We identify challenges particular to aircraft design optimization related to heterogeneous design variables and constraints. We propose the use of a partial-least-squares dimension reduction algorithm to address design space heterogeneity, a — Ali Tfaily, Youssef Diouane, Nathalie Bartoli
Symmetrizing Bregman Divergence on the Cone of Positive Definite Matrices: Which Mean to Use and Why
This work uncovers variational principles behind symmetrizing the Bregman divergences induced by generic mirror maps over the cone of positive definite matrices. We show that computing the canonical means for this symmetrization can be posed as minimizing the desired symmetrized divergences over a set of mean functionals defined axiomatically to satisfy certain properties. For the forward symmetrization, we prove that the arithmetic mean over the primal space is canonical for any mirror map over the positive definite cone. For the reverse symmetrization, we show that the canonical mean is the — Tushar Sial, Abhishek Halder
Knowledge Map
Connected Articles — Knowledge Graph
This article is connected to other articles through shared AI topics and tags.
More in Frontier Research
Magic, Madness, Heaven, Sin: LLM Output Diversity is Everything, Everywhere, All at Once
arXiv:2604.01504v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Research on Large Language Models (LLMs) studies output variation across generation, reasoning, alignment, and representational analysis, often under the umbrella of "diversity." Yet the terminology remains fragmented, largely because the normative objectives underlying tasks are rarely made explicit. We introduce the Magic, Madness, Heaven, Sin framework, which models output variation along a homogeneity-heterogeneity axis, where valuation is determined by the task and its normative objective. We organize tasks into four normative contexts: epistemic (factuality), interactional (user utility), societal (representation), and safety (robustness). For each, we examine the failure modes and vocabulary such as hallucination, mode collapse, bias,
Discussion
Sign in to join the discussion
No comments yet — be the first to share your thoughts!