I Asked ChatGPT If It Was A Psychopath—Here’s What It Said - Forbes
<a href="https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMirwFBVV95cUxNaUlWV3k3TG04MlBNc2p3TE1NVDFhbEYxMjhLMFd1S2NrOC11WjNickQ2dGVYR1l1eGNpU1Y2QkpCaFRwN2EtaGhyVmZkNU90dTBRRDZVWWtDRThPVGtXZjA5b3BQMlFiWmVtcDFoS2NCRTR4eWhNdWtoTGg5anQ0T2tHZ2ptdGdjNzFUUlNTMXZxMnh1TDN1TnVhR1RMcXJmM181ck1CRnQyeHlzbHl3?oc=5" target="_blank">I Asked ChatGPT If It Was A Psychopath—Here’s What It Said</a> <font color="#6f6f6f">Forbes</font>
Could not retrieve the full article text.
Read on Google News: ChatGPT →Sign in to highlight and annotate this article
Conversation starters
Daily AI Digest
Get the top 5 AI stories delivered to your inbox every morning.
More about
chatgpt
Arcee AI releases Trinity-Large-Thinking, a 399B-parameter MoE AI model under an Apache 2.0 license, allowing full customization and commercial use (Carl Franzen/VentureBeat)
Carl Franzen / VentureBeat : Arcee AI releases Trinity-Large-Thinking, a 399B-parameter MoE AI model under an Apache 2.0 license, allowing full customization and commercial use The baton of open source AI models has been passed on between several companies over the years since ChatGPT debuted in late 2022
Knowledge Map
Connected Articles — Knowledge Graph
This article is connected to other articles through shared AI topics and tags.
More in Models
A day has passed which is a decade in the ai world - is qwen 3.5 27b q6 still the best model to run on a 5090, or does the new bonsai and gemma models beat it?
Im specifically interested in coding ability. I have the q6 version of the claude opus 4.6 distill with 128k context for local coding (Still using claude opus for planning) and it works amazingly. Im a tech junkie, good enough is never good enough, are these new models better? submitted by /u/ArugulaAnnual1765 [link] [comments]
Gemma 4 is seriously broken when using Unsloth and llama.cpp
Hi! Just checking, am I the only one who has serious issues with Gemma 4 locally? I've played around with Gemma 4 using Unsloth quants on llama.cpp, and it's seriously broken. I'm using the latest changes from llama.cpp, along with the reccomended temperature, top-p and top-k. Giving it an article and asking it to list all typos along with the corrected version gives total nonsense. Here is a random news article I tested it with: https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/ce843ge47z4o I've tried the 26B MoE, I've tried the 31B, and I've tried UD-Q8_K_XL, Q8_0, and UD-Q4_K_XL. They all have the same issue. As a control, I tested the same thing in Google AI Studio, and there the models work great, finding actual typos instead of the nonsense I get locally. submitted by /u/Tastetrykker [link] [comment
Show HN: AI tool to merge people from two photos into one realistic group photo
At a friend's gathering, someone mentioned wanting to add her late father into a family photo. I figured this would be trivial — modern image models are powerful, just send two photos and ask the AI to merge them. She said she'd tried, but the results were weird and unstable, and she didn't know how to describe what she wanted. I went home and tried it myself. With a well-written prompt and two good photos, it works. But real-world use cases aren't two good photos — it's a modern family photo plus a damaged old portrait, or two old photos from different decades. That's when things fall apart. I looked at existing tools. Most showcase merges between clean, well-lit, modern photos. Nobody was solving the hard version: mismatched eras, damaged sources, different poses, different formality lev
Discussion
Sign in to join the discussion
No comments yet — be the first to share your thoughts!