Here's How You Can Train Any Agent Just by Talking: OpenClaw-RL Guide
OpenClaw-RL: Train Any Agent Simply by Talking is a new AI training system. It uses next-state signals, the replies and errors and state changes that follow each action. The system uses two kinds of feedback hidden in replies: evaluative and directional. Read All
171 reads
Here's How You Can Train Any Agent Just by Talking: OpenClaw-RL Guide
byaimodels44byaimodels44@aimodels44
Among other things, launching AIModels.fyi ... Find the right AI model for your project - https://aimodels.fyi
SubscribeMarch 25th, 2026


audio element.Speed1xVoiceDr. One Ms. Hacker byaimodels44@aimodels44byaimodels44@aimodels44Among other things, launching AIModels.fyi ... Find the right AI model for your project - https://aimodels.fyi
Subscribe
Among other things, launching AIModels.fyi ... Find the right AI model for your project - https://aimodels.fyi
Subscribe← Previous
Hauhaucs' Qwen3.5-27b-uncensored-hauhaucs-Aggressive Model on Huggingface: What You Need to Know
Up Next →
Qwen3.5-9b-uncensored-hauhaucs-Aggressive Model: A Beginner's Guide to Get You Started
About Author
Among other things, launching AIModels.fyi ... Find the right AI model for your project - https://aimodels.fyi
Read my storiesAbout @aimodels44
Comments

TOPICS
machine-learning#openclaw#artificial-intelligence#software-architecture#software-development#infrastructure#data-science#openclaw-rl#ai-agent
THIS ARTICLE WAS FEATURED IN


Related Stories

10 Languages, 9 Premium Voices: Meet Qwen3-TTS CustomVoice
aimodels44
Feb 11, 2026

Beep Beep Bop Bop: How to Deploy Multiple AI Agents Using Local LLMs

Baby Commando
Oct 19, 2023

How Will Software Engineers Lose Their Jobs Within the Next 5 Years?

Nuralem Abizov
Jul 21, 2023

🎬 Introducing MetaGPT: Unleashing the Power of AI Agents for Complex Tasks
Louis Bouchard
Aug 29, 2023

We Asked AI to Improve This Article

AgentHQ
Mar 08, 2023

How to Build an Agent With an OpenAI Assistant in Python - Part 1: Conversational

Jean-Marie Dalmasso
Feb 09, 2024

10 Languages, 9 Premium Voices: Meet Qwen3-TTS CustomVoice
aimodels44
Feb 11, 2026

Beep Beep Bop Bop: How to Deploy Multiple AI Agents Using Local LLMs

Baby Commando
Oct 19, 2023

How Will Software Engineers Lose Their Jobs Within the Next 5 Years?

Nuralem Abizov
Jul 21, 2023

🎬 Introducing MetaGPT: Unleashing the Power of AI Agents for Complex Tasks
Louis Bouchard
Aug 29, 2023

We Asked AI to Improve This Article

AgentHQ
Mar 08, 2023

How to Build an Agent With an OpenAI Assistant in Python - Part 1: Conversational

Jean-Marie Dalmasso
Feb 09, 2024
Hackernoon AI
https://hackernoon.com/heres-how-you-can-train-any-agent-just-by-talking-openclaw-rl-guide?source=rssSign in to highlight and annotate this article

Conversation starters
Daily AI Digest
Get the top 5 AI stories delivered to your inbox every morning.
More about
trainingagent
Revealing the Learning Dynamics of Long-Context Continual Pre-training
arXiv:2604.02650v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Existing studies on Long-Context Continual Pre-training (LCCP) mainly focus on small-scale models and limited data regimes (tens of billions of tokens). We argue that directly migrating these small-scale settings to industrial-grade models risks insufficient adaptation and premature training termination. Furthermore, current evaluation methods rely heavily on downstream benchmarks (e.g., Needle-in-a-Haystack), which often fail to reflect the intrinsic convergence state and can lead to "deceptive saturation". In this paper, we present the first systematic investigation of LCCP learning dynamics using the industrial-grade Hunyuan-A13B (80B total parameters), tracking its evolution across a 200B-token training trajectory. Specifically, we propos

Reinforcement Learning-based Knowledge Distillation with LLM-as-a-Judge
arXiv:2604.02621v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Reinforcement Learning (RL) has been shown to substantially improve the reasoning capability of small and large language models (LLMs), but existing approaches typically rely on verifiable rewards, hence ground truth labels. We propose an RL framework that uses rewards from an LLM that acts as a judge evaluating model outputs over large amounts of unlabeled data, enabling label-free knowledge distillation and replacing the need of ground truth supervision. Notably, the judge operates with a single-token output, making reward computation efficient. When combined with verifiable rewards, our approach yields substantial performance gains across math reasoning benchmarks. These results suggest that LLM-based evaluators can produce effective train

Train Yourself as an LLM: Exploring Effects of AI Literacy on Persuasion via Role-playing LLM Training
arXiv:2604.02637v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: As large language models (LLMs) become increasingly persuasive, there is concern that people's opinions and decisions may be influenced across various contexts at scale. Prior mitigation (e.g., AI detectors and disclaimers) largely treats people as passive recipients of AI-generated information. To provide a more proactive intervention against persuasive AI, we introduce $\textbf{LLMimic}$, a role-play-based, interactive, gamified AI literacy tutorial, where participants assume the role of an LLM and progress through three key stages of the training pipeline (pretraining, SFT, and RLHF). We conducted a $2 \times 3$ between-subjects study ($N = 274$) where participants either (1) watched an AI history video (control) or (2) interacted with LLM
Knowledge Map
Connected Articles — Knowledge Graph
This article is connected to other articles through shared AI topics and tags.
More in Models

Evaluating the Formal Reasoning Capabilities of Large Language Models through Chomsky Hierarchy
arXiv:2604.02709v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The formal reasoning capabilities of LLMs are crucial for advancing automated software engineering. However, existing benchmarks for LLMs lack systematic evaluation based on computation and complexity, leaving a critical gap in understanding their formal reasoning capabilities. Therefore, it is still unknown whether SOTA LLMs can grasp the structured, hierarchical complexity of formal languages as defined by Computation Theory. To address this, we introduce ChomskyBench, a benchmark for systematically evaluating LLMs through the lens of Chomsky Hierarchy. Unlike prior work that uses vectorized classification for neural networks, ChomskyBench is the first to combine full Chomsky Hierarchy coverage, process-trace evaluation via natural language

Trivial Vocabulary Bans Improve LLM Reasoning More Than Deep Linguistic Constraints
arXiv:2604.02699v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: A previous study reported that E-Prime (English without the verb "to be") selectively altered reasoning in language models, with cross-model correlations suggesting a structural signature tied to which vocabulary was removed. I designed a replication with active controls to test the proposed mechanism: cognitive restructuring through specific vocabulary-cognition mappings. The experiment tested five conditions (unconstrained control, E-Prime, No-Have, elaborated metacognitive prompt, neutral filler-word ban) across six models and seven reasoning tasks (N=15,600 trials, 11,919 after compliance filtering). Every prediction from the cognitive restructuring hypothesis was disconfirmed. All four treatments outperformed the control (83.0%), includi

Redirected, Not Removed: Task-Dependent Stereotyping Reveals the Limits of LLM Alignments
arXiv:2604.02669v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: How biased is a language model? The answer depends on how you ask. A model that refuses to choose between castes for a leadership role will, in a fill-in-the-blank task, reliably associate upper castes with purity and lower castes with lack of hygiene. Single-task benchmarks miss this because they capture only one slice of a model's bias profile. We introduce a hierarchical taxonomy covering 9 bias types, including under-studied axes like caste, linguistic, and geographic bias, operationalized through 7 evaluation tasks that span explicit decision-making to implicit association. Auditing 7 commercial and open-weight LLMs with \textasciitilde45K prompts, we find three systematic patterns. First, bias is task-dependent: models counter stereotyp

SocioEval: A Template-Based Framework for Evaluating Socioeconomic Status Bias in Foundation Models
arXiv:2604.02660v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: As Large Language Models (LLMs) increasingly power decision-making systems across critical domains, understanding and mitigating their biases becomes essential for responsible AI deployment. Although bias assessment frameworks have proliferated for attributes such as race and gender, socioeconomic status bias remains significantly underexplored despite its widespread implications in the real world. We introduce SocioEval, a template-based framework for systematically evaluating socioeconomic bias in foundation models through decision-making tasks. Our hierarchical framework encompasses 8 themes and 18 topics, generating 240 prompts across 6 class-pair combinations. We evaluated 13 frontier LLMs on 3,120 responses using a rigorous three-stage

Discussion
Sign in to join the discussion
No comments yet — be the first to share your thoughts!