Has anyone used Jackrong/Qwen3.5-27B-Claude-4.6-Opus-Reasoning-Distilled for agents? How did it fair?
Just noticed this one today. Not sure how they got away distilling from an Anthropic model. https://huggingface.co/Jackrong/Qwen3.5-27B-Claude-4.6-Opus-Reasoning-Distilled submitted by /u/Vegetable_Sun_9225 [link] [comments]
Could not retrieve the full article text.
Read on Reddit r/LocalLLaMA →Reddit r/LocalLLaMA
https://www.reddit.com/r/LocalLLaMA/comments/1sa7jo2/has_anyone_used/Sign in to highlight and annotate this article
Conversation starters
Daily AI Digest
Get the top 5 AI stories delivered to your inbox every morning.
More about
claudemodelreasoning
I Let AI Agents Into My Codebase. Here's What Actually Broke (And How I Fixed It)
Once harness stops being only a concept and begins to take structural form, the engineering worksite cannot remain unchanged. How the repository is organized, how architecture draws boundaries, how review is layered, and how default paths are designed—questions that once looked like engineering governance or team habit suddenly move to the center. Once agents truly enter the workflow, the question facing software teams is no longer only how code should be written, but how the worksite itself should be written. This part is concerned not with whether agents can write code, but with how repositories, architecture, review, merge strategy, and slop governance change as a result. See Figures 3-1 through 3-7 in this part. Figure 3-1. How the repository becomes the agent's operating system graph
Knowledge Map
Connected Articles — Knowledge Graph
This article is connected to other articles through shared AI topics and tags.
More in Models
Token Budgets for Real Projects: How I Keep AI Costs Under $50/Month
AI coding assistants are useful. They're also expensive if you're not paying attention. I was spending $120/month before I started tracking. Now I spend under $50 for the same (honestly, better) output. Here's the system. The Problem: Invisible Costs Most developers don't track AI token usage. They paste code, get results, paste more code. Each interaction costs money, but the feedback loop is delayed — you see the bill at the end of the month. The biggest cost drivers aren't the prompts. They're the context. A typical AI coding session: System prompt: ~500 tokens Your context (project files, examples): ~2,000-8,000 tokens Your actual question: ~200 tokens AI response: ~500-2,000 tokens That context window is 80% of your bill. And most of it is the same information you send every time. The
AI Agents vs Traditional Automation: When to Use Each
The Hype vs Reality AI agents are everywhere in 2025. But deploying an LLM for every automation task is like using a jackhammer to hang a picture frame. Understanding where agents excel—and where they don't—is the difference between building useful software and chasing trends. What Makes Something an "AI Agent" An agent: Has access to tools (functions it can call) Decides which tools to use and when Iterates until a goal is achieved import Anthropic from ' @anthropic-ai/sdk ' ; const anthropic = new Anthropic (); const tools : Anthropic . Tool [] = [ { name : ' search_codebase ' , description : ' Search for code patterns in the repository ' , input_schema : { type : ' object ' , properties : { query : { type : ' string ' } }, required : [ ' query ' ], }, }, { name : ' run_tests ' , descrip
Discussion
Sign in to join the discussion
No comments yet — be the first to share your thoughts!