From APIs to AI Agents: How Backend Systems Are Evolving in 2026
🚀 Introduction: The Shift No One Is Talking About Continue reading on Medium »
Could not retrieve the full article text.
Read on Medium AI →Sign in to highlight and annotate this article
Conversation starters
Daily AI Digest
Get the top 5 AI stories delivered to your inbox every morning.
More about
agent
Chinese AI rivals clash over Anthropic’s OpenClaw exit amid global token crunch
Chinese tech companies are engaged in a public war of words as they compete to capitalise on US start-up Anthropic’s decision to pull its industry-leading Claude models from open-source AI agent tool OpenClaw. The development comes as AI agents have triggered a huge increase in demand for AI tokens – the core metric of AI usage – raising questions about the long-term ability of industry players to meet this demand amid a growing global crunch in computational power. On Sunday, Anthropic...
Simulating Couple Conflict: Designing A Multi-Agent System for Therapy Training and Practice
arXiv:2601.10970v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Couples therapy requires managing complex, evolving emotional dynamics between partners, but traditional training methods for therapists, like role-play, lack realism, consistency, and control. We present a multi-modal simulation that models therapy as a controlled, multi-agent dynamical system with structured interaction stages. Therapists practice with a pair of client-agents who go through six evolving stages that respond to therapist actions. This simulation enables practice with demand-withdraw conflict patterns in a closed-loop environment. The simulation uses a sense-plan-act architecture: it detects the therapist's input, updates agents' interaction states based on psychotherapy theory and transcript analysis, and generates
Knowledge Map
Connected Articles — Knowledge Graph
This article is connected to other articles through shared AI topics and tags.
More in Releases
Simple parallel estimation of the partition ratio for Gibbs distributions
arXiv:2505.18324v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: We consider the problem of estimating the partition function $Z(\beta)=\sum_x \exp(\beta(H(x))$ of a Gibbs distribution with the Hamiltonian $H:\Omega\rightarrow\{0\}\cup[1,n]$. As shown in [Harris & Kolmogorov 2024], the log-ratio $q=\ln (Z(\beta_{\max})/Z(\beta_{\min}))$ can be estimated with accuracy $\epsilon$ using $O(\frac{q \log n}{\epsilon^2})$ calls to an oracle that produces a sample from the Gibbs distribution for parameter $\beta\in[\beta_{\min},\beta_{\max}]$. That algorithm is inherently sequential, or {\em adaptive}: the queried values of $\beta$ depend on previous samples. Recently, [Liu, Yin & Zhang 2024] developed a non-adaptive version that needs $O( q (\log^2 n) (\log q + \log \log n + \epsilon^{-2}) )$ samples.
Near-Optimal Space Lower Bounds for Streaming CSPs
arXiv:2604.01400v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: In a streaming constraint satisfaction problem (streaming CSP), a $p$-pass algorithm receives the constraints of an instance sequentially, making $p$ passes over the input in a fixed order, with the goal of approximating the maximum fraction of satisfiable constraints. We show near optimal space lower bounds for streaming CSPs, improving upon prior works. (1) Fei, Minzer and Wang (\textit{STOC 2026}) showed that for any CSP, the basic linear program defines a threshold $\alpha_{\mathrm{LP}}\in [0,1]$ such that, for any $\varepsilon > 0$, an $(\alpha_{\mathrm{LP}} - \varepsilon)$-approximation can be achieved using constant passes and polylogarithmic space, whereas achieving $(\alpha_{\mathrm{LP}} + \varepsilon)$-approximation requires $\Ome
Polynomial-Time Almost Log-Space Tree Evaluation by Catalytic Pebbling
arXiv:2604.02606v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The Tree Evaluation Problem ($\mathsf{TreeEval}$) is a computational problem originally proposed as a candidate to prove a separation between complexity classes $\mathsf{P}$ and $\mathsf{L}$. Recently, this problem has gained significant attention after Cook and Mertz (STOC 2024) showed that $\mathsf{TreeEval}$ can be solved using $O(\log n\log\log n)$ bits of space. Their algorithm, despite getting very close to showing $\mathsf{TreeEval} \in \mathsf{L}$, falls short, and in particular, it does not run in polynomial time. In this work, we present the first polynomial-time, almost logarithmic-space algorithm for $\mathsf{TreeEval}$. For any $\varepsilon>0$, our algorithm solves $\mathsf{TreeEval}$ in time $\mathrm{poly}(n)$ while using $O(\
A Lower Bound for Grothendieck's Constant
arXiv:2603.22616v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We show that Grothendieck's real constant $K_{G}$ satisfies $K_G\geq c+10^{-26}$, improving on the lower bound of $c=1.676956674215576\ldots$ of Davie and Reeds from 1984 and 1991, respectively.
Discussion
Sign in to join the discussion
No comments yet — be the first to share your thoughts!