Exclusive | The Sudden Fall of OpenAI’s Most Hyped Product Since ChatGPT - WSJ
<a href="https://news.google.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?oc=5" target="_blank">Exclusive | The Sudden Fall of OpenAI’s Most Hyped Product Since ChatGPT</a> <font color="#6f6f6f">WSJ</font>
Could not retrieve the full article text.
Read on Google News: ChatGPT →Sign in to highlight and annotate this article
Conversation starters
Daily AI Digest
Get the top 5 AI stories delivered to your inbox every morning.
More about
productchatgpt
Your AI API, your rules: Introducing Custom AI Job instructions
The problem with one-size-fits-all AI SharpAPI's endpoints are built to work out of the box. You send a resume, you get a score. You send a job title, you get a description. That's the promise, and it holds for most use cases. The workaround until now was wrapping our API in your own middleware, manually injecting context before every call. That works, but it's boilerplate you shouldn't have to write. We shipped a native per-account, per-endpoint instruction system. You write the context once. We inject it into every relevant AI request automatically, at the right layer, without touching your API calls. How it works Every SharpAPI account now has a Customize AI Jobs section in the dashboard. It lists all available AI job types grouped by category, from HR and recruitment endpoints to e-com
When You Push for 3x
I was at a lunch table with my boss and most of my team, telling the story of how we'd doubled our velocity. I was proud of the number. I told it like it was a win. My team was sitting right there, listening to me describe what they'd done to make that number. They knew. I didn't yet. That's the part I don't tell in the short version. Not just that velocity got gamed, but that I was the one carrying the number into rooms and setting it on the table like a trophy. Every time I did that, I taught my team something about what I was rewarding. Death by a thousand paper cuts Velocity doesn't collapse in one visible moment. There's no incident report. No postmortem. It erodes the way a codebase quietly deteriorates when nobody's watching the right signals. Tickets start getting larger. Not more
I Built a 209-Page Sauna Site Without Knowing How to Code
I am not a developer. I want to say that upfront so you know what kind of post this is. What ive tried to do is figuring out distribution before figuring out code. The site is sauna.guide . It has 209 pages. Sauna listings, brand reviews, buying guides, gear recommendations. All of it built with Next.js, all of it static, all of it generated from JSON files and markdown. I did not write the code by hand. I used AI tools to help me build it. But the decisions, the outreach, the content strategy, the emails to manufacturers. That part is all me. I hope and believe that will make the difference. Why saunas I love saunas. That is the whole origin story. No market research spreadsheet, no TAM analysis. I wanted to build something in a space I actually care about, and saunas felt right. There is
Knowledge Map
Connected Articles — Knowledge Graph
This article is connected to other articles through shared AI topics and tags.
More in Models
Financial News Sentiment Analyzer
Bloomberg Terminal costs $24,240/year. I built something that does the sentiment analysis part for $0.02 per article. It's not Bloomberg. It doesn't do terminal access, charting, or messaging. But if all you need is "what's the market saying about NVDA right now?", it gets you 90% of the way for 0.001% of the cost. Why I Built This I was building a trading signal pipeline and needed financial sentiment data. My options were: Pay Bloomberg $24K/year (lol no) Use Finnhub's sentiment endpoint ($500/year, but the sentiment is basic. Just positive/negative with no confidence score) Scrape it myself I went with option 3. Spent a few weeks scraping Yahoo Finance, Google News, and SEC EDGAR, wiring up VADER for quick sentiment, then an LLM for the headlines VADER gets wrong. Then I realized other
How I Made Claude Actually Reliable at Math (5-Minute Setup)
I spent a week watching Claude confidently give me wrong answers. Not wrong opinions — wrong numbers . TDEE calculations off by 200 calories. Mortgage amortization that didn't add up. Compound interest that was close-ish but not quite right. The thing is, Claude sounds confident when it hallucinates math. It walks you through the reasoning, uses the right formula names, and arrives at a number that feels plausible. The problem only shows up when you check the work. This is a known issue with LLMs. They don't actually "do math" — they pattern-match from training data. Arithmetic is surprisingly unreliable, especially for multi-step calculations. Here's how I fixed it. The Problem: LLMs Are Not Calculators When you ask Claude to calculate your TDEE (Total Daily Energy Expenditure), it might
Discussion
Sign in to join the discussion
No comments yet — be the first to share your thoughts!