Exclusive | OpenAI Buys Tech-Industry Talk Show TBPN - WSJ
Hey there, superstar! ✨
Imagine a super-duper smart computer friend, like a robot who can talk and learn, called OpenAI.
Now, imagine a TV show where grown-ups talk about cool new ideas, like a puppet show but with real people! This show is called TBPN.
OpenAI, our smart computer friend, just bought that TV show! 🥳
Why? Because they want to tell everyone how awesome and helpful their smart computer brains are, so people aren't scared. It's like they want to tell a happy story about their robot friends, so everyone knows they're good guys! 🤖💖
Exclusive | OpenAI Buys Tech-Industry Talk Show TBPN WSJ OpenAI Buys Streaming Show ‘TBPN,’ Aiming to Change Narrative on A.I. The New York Times The Most Powerful People in the World Are Obsessed With Media Again The Hollywood Reporter
Could not retrieve the full article text.
Read on Google News: OpenAI →Sign in to highlight and annotate this article
Conversation starters
Daily AI Digest
Get the top 5 AI stories delivered to your inbox every morning.
More about
report
Launch HN: Freestyle – Sandboxes for Coding Agents
We’re Ben and Jacob, cofounders of Freestyle ( https://freestyle.sh ). We’re building a cloud for Coding Agents. For the first generation of agents it looked like workflows with minimal tools. 2 years ago we published a package to let AI work in SQL, at that time GPT-4 could write simple scripts. Soon after the first AI App Builders started using AI to make whole websites; we supported that with a serverless deploy system. But the current generation is going much further, instead of minimal tools and basic serverless apps AI can utilize the full power of a computer (“sandbox”). We’re building sandboxes that are interchangeable with EC2s from your agents perspective, with bonus features: 1. We’ve figured out how to fork a sandbox horizontally without more than a 400ms pause in it. That's no
Can artificial intelligence be governed—or will it govern us?
On July 16, 1945, when the world’s first nuclear explosion shook the plains of New Mexico, J. Robert Oppenheimer , who led the project, quoted the Bhagavad Gita : “Now I am become Death, the destroyer of worlds.” And indeed, he had. The world was never truly the same after nuclear power became a reality. Today, however, we have lost that reverence for the power of technology. Instead of proceeding deliberately and with caution, we rush ahead. In his Techno-Optimist Manifesto , tech investor Marc Andreessen implied that AI regulation was a form of murder. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth punished Anthropic when it tried to impose limits on its own technology. Clearly, we’ve been here before and shown that we can meet the challenge. We contained the nuclear threat and put useful limits on the
Twenty seconds to approve a military strike; 1.2 seconds to deny a health insurance claim. The human is in the AI loop. Humanity is not
In the first twenty-four hours of the war with Iran, the United States struck a thousand targets. By the end of the week, the total exceeded three thousand — twice as many as in the “shock and awe” phase of the 2003 invasion of Iraq, according to Pete Hegseth . This unprecedented number of strikes was made possible by artificial intelligence . U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM) insists that humans remain in the loop on every targeting decision, and that the AI is there to help them to make “smarter decisions faster.” But exactly what role humans can play when the systems are operating at this pace is unclear. Israel’s use of AI-enabled targeting in its war on Hamas may offer some insights. An investigation last year reported that the Israeli military had deployed an AI system called Lavender t
Knowledge Map
Connected Articles — Knowledge Graph
This article is connected to other articles through shared AI topics and tags.
Discussion
Sign in to join the discussion
No comments yet — be the first to share your thoughts!