Distal-Stable Beam for Continuum Robots
arXiv:2604.01490v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Continuum robots are well suited for constrained environments but suffer from low distal stiffness, resulting in large posture errors under external loads. In this paper, we propose a novel structural primitive, the Distal-Stable Beam, which achieves a strong stiffness gradient through purely geometric design, maintaining compliance in the intermediate section while ensuring high distal rigidity. The structure consists of two parallel rods and one convergent rod constrained by guide disks, introducing geometric coupling that suppresses deformation modes and preserves distal posture. Experiments show that the distal stiffness is 12 times higher than at the center, corresponding to an approximately 100-fold improvement over a conventional canti
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Continuum robots are well suited for constrained environments but suffer from low distal stiffness, resulting in large posture errors under external loads. In this paper, we propose a novel structural primitive, the Distal-Stable Beam, which achieves a strong stiffness gradient through purely geometric design, maintaining compliance in the intermediate section while ensuring high distal rigidity. The structure consists of two parallel rods and one convergent rod constrained by guide disks, introducing geometric coupling that suppresses deformation modes and preserves distal posture. Experiments show that the distal stiffness is 12 times higher than at the center, corresponding to an approximately 100-fold improvement over a conventional cantilever beam. The proposed mechanism enables simultaneous compliance and distal stability without active stiffness modulation, providing a new design approach for continuum robots requiring both safety and precision.
Comments: 8 pages, 7 figures
Subjects:
Robotics (cs.RO)
Cite as: arXiv:2604.01490 [cs.RO]
(or arXiv:2604.01490v1 [cs.RO] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2604.01490
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
Submission history
From: Ayato Kanada [view email] [v1] Wed, 1 Apr 2026 23:57:18 UTC (31,713 KB)
Sign in to highlight and annotate this article

Conversation starters
Daily AI Digest
Get the top 5 AI stories delivered to your inbox every morning.
More about
announcecompliancesafety![Considering NeurIPS submission [D]](https://d2xsxph8kpxj0f.cloudfront.net/310419663032563854/konzwo8nGf8Z4uZsMefwMr/default-img-robot-hand-JvPW6jsLFTCtkgtb97Kys5.webp)
Considering NeurIPS submission [D]
Wondering if it worth submitting paper I’m working on to NeurIPS. I have formal mathematical proof for convergence of a novel agentic system plus a compelling application to a real world use case. The problem is I just have a couple examples. I’ve tried working with synthetic data and benchmarks but no existing benchmarks captures the complexity of the real world data for any interesting results. Is it worth submitting or should I hold on to it until I can build up more data? submitted by /u/Clean-Baseball3748 [link] [comments]
![[R], 31 MILLIONS High frequency data, Light GBM worked perfectly](https://d2xsxph8kpxj0f.cloudfront.net/310419663032563854/konzwo8nGf8Z4uZsMefwMr/default-img-neural-network-P6fqXULWLNUwjuxqUZnB3T.webp)
[R], 31 MILLIONS High frequency data, Light GBM worked perfectly
We just published a paper on predicting adverse selection in high-frequency crypto markets using LightGBM , and I wanted to share it here because the findings are directly relevant to anyone dealing high frequency data and machine learning The core problem we solved: Every market maker's nightmare — getting picked off by informed traders right before a big move. We built a model that flags those toxic seconds before they wreck you. The data: - 31,081,463 second-level observations of BTC/USDT perpetual futures on Bybit - February 2025 → February 2026 (381 raw daily files) - Strict walk-forward regime, zero lookahead bias The key results (this is the part that shocked us): Our TailScore metric — which combines predicted toxicity probability with predicted price move severity — flags the top

Anthropic cuts off the ability to use Claude subscriptions with OpenClaw and third-party AI agents
Are you a subscriber to Anthropic's Claude Pro ($20 monthly) or Max ($100-$200 monthly) plans and use its Claude AI models and products to power third-party AI agents like OpenClaw ? If so, you're in for an unpleasant surprise. Anthropic announced a few hours ago that starting tomorrow, Saturday, April 4, 2026, at 12 pm PT/3 pm ET, it will no longer be possible for those Claude subscribers to use their subscriptions to hook Anthropic's Claude models up to third-party agentic tools, citing the strain such usage was placing on Anthropic's compute and engineering resources, and desire to serve a wide number of users reliably. "We’ve been working hard to meet the increase in demand for Claude, and our subscriptions weren't built for the usage patterns of these third-pa
Knowledge Map
Connected Articles — Knowledge Graph
This article is connected to other articles through shared AI topics and tags.
More in Research Papers
![[R], 31 MILLIONS High frequency data, Light GBM worked perfectly](https://d2xsxph8kpxj0f.cloudfront.net/310419663032563854/konzwo8nGf8Z4uZsMefwMr/default-img-neural-network-P6fqXULWLNUwjuxqUZnB3T.webp)
[R], 31 MILLIONS High frequency data, Light GBM worked perfectly
We just published a paper on predicting adverse selection in high-frequency crypto markets using LightGBM , and I wanted to share it here because the findings are directly relevant to anyone dealing high frequency data and machine learning The core problem we solved: Every market maker's nightmare — getting picked off by informed traders right before a big move. We built a model that flags those toxic seconds before they wreck you. The data: - 31,081,463 second-level observations of BTC/USDT perpetual futures on Bybit - February 2025 → February 2026 (381 raw daily files) - Strict walk-forward regime, zero lookahead bias The key results (this is the part that shocked us): Our TailScore metric — which combines predicted toxicity probability with predicted price move severity — flags the top


![[D] ACL 2026 Decision](https://d2xsxph8kpxj0f.cloudfront.net/310419663032563854/konzwo8nGf8Z4uZsMefwMr/default-img-satellite-bUaXYHZsoMZjyA4XgfFqkD.webp)
Discussion
Sign in to join the discussion
No comments yet — be the first to share your thoughts!