Live
Black Hat USAAI BusinessBlack Hat AsiaAI BusinessStop Using Elaborate Personas: Research Shows They Degrade Claude Code OutputDEV CommunityAn Engineering-grade breakdown of RAG PipelineDEV CommunityUnlock the Power of Private AI: Build a Local RAG Pipeline with LangGraph, Ollama & Vector DatabasesDEV CommunityDeepSource for Python: Static Analysis and AutofixDEV CommunityI tried to destroy this AirTag alternative, but it wouldn't crack - unlike othersZDNet AIHow I built an AI that reads bank contracts the way bankers do (not the way customers do)DEV CommunityBuffer Overflows on x64 Windows: A Practical Beginners Guide (Part 2): ExploitationDEV CommunityImplementing Zero Trust Architecture in IoT-Heavy Enterprise NetworksDEV CommunityTransforming Raspberry Pi into an AI-Native Edge IDS for SMBsDEV CommunityWhich countries use ChatGPT the most? New study reveals top 5 - Deseret NewsGoogle News: ChatGPTThe Stages of AI GriefDEV CommunityImplementing Zero Trust Architecture for Unmanaged IoT at the Network EdgeDEV CommunityBlack Hat USAAI BusinessBlack Hat AsiaAI BusinessStop Using Elaborate Personas: Research Shows They Degrade Claude Code OutputDEV CommunityAn Engineering-grade breakdown of RAG PipelineDEV CommunityUnlock the Power of Private AI: Build a Local RAG Pipeline with LangGraph, Ollama & Vector DatabasesDEV CommunityDeepSource for Python: Static Analysis and AutofixDEV CommunityI tried to destroy this AirTag alternative, but it wouldn't crack - unlike othersZDNet AIHow I built an AI that reads bank contracts the way bankers do (not the way customers do)DEV CommunityBuffer Overflows on x64 Windows: A Practical Beginners Guide (Part 2): ExploitationDEV CommunityImplementing Zero Trust Architecture in IoT-Heavy Enterprise NetworksDEV CommunityTransforming Raspberry Pi into an AI-Native Edge IDS for SMBsDEV CommunityWhich countries use ChatGPT the most? New study reveals top 5 - Deseret NewsGoogle News: ChatGPTThe Stages of AI GriefDEV CommunityImplementing Zero Trust Architecture for Unmanaged IoT at the Network EdgeDEV Community

CrossTrace: A Cross-Domain Dataset of Grounded Scientific Reasoning Traces for Hypothesis Generation

arXiv cs.CLby Andrew Bouras, OMS-II Research FellowApril 1, 20262 min read0 views
Source Quiz

arXiv:2603.28924v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Scientific hypothesis generation is a critical bottleneck in accelerating research, yet existing datasets for training and evaluating hypothesis-generating models are limited to single domains and lack explicit reasoning traces connecting prior knowledge to novel contributions. I introduce CrossTrace, a dataset of 1,389 grounded scientific reasoning traces spanning biomedical research (518), AI/ML (605), and cross-domain work (266). Each trace captures the structured reasoning chain from established knowledge through intermediate logical steps to a novel hypothesis, with every step grounded in source paper text. I define an Input/Trace/Output schema that extends the Bit-Flip-Spark framework of HypoGen with step-level verification, a taxonomy

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Scientific hypothesis generation is a critical bottleneck in accelerating research, yet existing datasets for training and evaluating hypothesis-generating models are limited to single domains and lack explicit reasoning traces connecting prior knowledge to novel contributions. I introduce CrossTrace, a dataset of 1,389 grounded scientific reasoning traces spanning biomedical research (518), AI/ML (605), and cross-domain work (266). Each trace captures the structured reasoning chain from established knowledge through intermediate logical steps to a novel hypothesis, with every step grounded in source paper text. I define an Input/Trace/Output schema that extends the Bit-Flip-Spark framework of HypoGen with step-level verification, a taxonomy of eight discovery patterns, and multi-domain coverage. Fine-tuning Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct on CrossTrace via QLoRA yields substantial improvements over the untuned baseline: IAScore rises from 0.828 to 0.968 (GPT-4o judge) and from 0.716 to 0.888 (Claude Opus 4.5), structural compliance improves from 0% to 100%, and spark cosine similarity increases from 0.221 to 0.620. Balanced cross-domain training (biomedical + AI/ML + CS) outperforms single-domain training, providing evidence that scientific reasoning patterns transfer across disciplines. Human validation of 150 stratified records confirms 99.7% step-level grounding accuracy and a 0.0% fabrication rate. To my knowledge, CrossTrace is the first large-scale, cross-domain dataset with step-level grounded reasoning traces for hypothesis generation, and my results demonstrate that such traces are an effective training signal whose benefits are at least partially domain-general.

Comments: 14 pages, 1 figure, 8 tables. Dataset and code available at this https URL

Subjects:

Computation and Language (cs.CL)

Cite as: arXiv:2603.28924 [cs.CL]

(or arXiv:2603.28924v1 [cs.CL] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.28924

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Andrew Bouras [view email] [v1] Mon, 30 Mar 2026 18:55:55 UTC (115 KB)

Was this article helpful?

Sign in to highlight and annotate this article

AI
Ask AI about this article
Powered by AI News Hub · full article context loaded
Ready

Conversation starters

Ask anything about this article…

Daily AI Digest

Get the top 5 AI stories delivered to your inbox every morning.

More about

claudemodeltraining

Knowledge Map

Knowledge Map
TopicsEntitiesSource
CrossTrace:…claudemodeltrainingannouncecompliancereasoningarXiv cs.CL

Connected Articles — Knowledge Graph

This article is connected to other articles through shared AI topics and tags.

Knowledge Graph100 articles · 172 connections
Scroll to zoom · drag to pan · click to open

Discussion

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet — be the first to share your thoughts!

More in Models