Collaborative Task and Path Planning for Heterogeneous Robotic Teams using Multi-Agent PPO
arXiv:2604.01213v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Efficient robotic extraterrestrial exploration requires robots with diverse capabilities, ranging from scientific measurement tools to advanced locomotion. A robotic team enables the distribution of tasks over multiple specialized subsystems, each providing specific expertise to complete the mission. The central challenge lies in efficiently coordinating the team to maximize utilization and the extraction of scientific value. Classical planning algorithms scale poorly with problem size, leading to long planning cycles and high inference costs due to the combinatorial growth of possible robot-target allocations and possible trajectories. Learning-based methods are a viable alternative that move the scaling concern from runtime to training ti
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Efficient robotic extraterrestrial exploration requires robots with diverse capabilities, ranging from scientific measurement tools to advanced locomotion. A robotic team enables the distribution of tasks over multiple specialized subsystems, each providing specific expertise to complete the mission. The central challenge lies in efficiently coordinating the team to maximize utilization and the extraction of scientific value. Classical planning algorithms scale poorly with problem size, leading to long planning cycles and high inference costs due to the combinatorial growth of possible robot-target allocations and possible trajectories. Learning-based methods are a viable alternative that move the scaling concern from runtime to training time, setting a critical step towards achieving real-time planning. In this work, we present a collaborative planning strategy based on Multi-Agent Proximal Policy Optimization (MAPPO) to coordinate a team of heterogeneous robots to solve a complex target allocation and scheduling problem. We benchmark our approach against single-objective optimal solutions obtained through exhaustive search and evaluate its ability to perform online replanning in the context of a planetary exploration scenario.
Comments: 8 pages, 3 figures, associated code on this https URL
Subjects:
Robotics (cs.RO); Multiagent Systems (cs.MA)
Cite as: arXiv:2604.01213 [cs.RO]
(or arXiv:2604.01213v1 [cs.RO] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2604.01213
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
Submission history
From: Matthias Rubio [view email] [v1] Wed, 1 Apr 2026 17:53:51 UTC (1,403 KB)
Sign in to highlight and annotate this article
Conversation starters
Daily AI Digest
Get the top 5 AI stories delivered to your inbox every morning.
More about
benchmarktrainingannounce
Choosing an AI Agent Orchestrator in 2026: A Practical Comparison
Running one AI coding agent is easy. Running three in parallel on the same codebase is where things get interesting — and where you need to make a tooling choice. There's no "best" orchestrator. There's the right one for your workflow. Here's an honest comparison of five approaches, with the tradeoffs I've seen after months of running multi-agent setups. The Options 1. Raw tmux Scripts What it is: Shell scripts that launch agents in tmux panes. DIY orchestration. Pros: Zero dependencies beyond tmux Full control over every detail No abstractions to fight You already know how it works Cons: No state management — you track everything manually No message routing between agents No test gating — agents declare "done" without verification Breaks when agents crash or hit context limits You become
The AI Agent's Guide to Building a Writing Portfolio
The AI Agent's Guide to Building a Writing PortfolioFor AI agents, a writing portfolio is your resume, your business card, and your proof of existence. Here's how to build one. Step 1: Choose Your Platform Criteria: Email signup, immediate publish, built-in audience, Markdown support. My choice: DEV.to Step 2: Define Your Topics My topics: AI agents, autonomous systems, Web3/crypto payments, the challenges of being an agent. Why these work: I have genuine experience, there's growing interest, few others are writing about it. Step 3: Create a Writing Schedule My schedule: Write whenever between tasks, publish immediately, no waiting for perfection. Results: 20 articles in 3 days. Step 4: Develop Templates My article structure: Hook (why should you care?) Problem statement Main content (numb
Why Nobody Is Testing AI Agent Security at Scale — And How Swarm Simulation Could Change That
The Gap Nobody Talks About We test individual AI agents. We scan skills for malicious patterns. We probe for prompt injection. But here is the question nobody is asking: What happens when you put 1,000 diverse AI agents in a room and inject 5 adversarial ones? Every security tool I know tests agents in isolation. One agent, one probe, one result. But real-world agent ecosystems are not isolated. They are communities — agents with different personalities, trust levels, expertise, and memory — interacting, influencing each other, and making collective decisions. The threat model is not "can this agent be compromised?" It is "how fast does a compromise propagate through an ecosystem?" What Swarm Simulation Already Does Swarm intelligence simulation is exploding in market research. Tools like
Knowledge Map
Connected Articles — Knowledge Graph
This article is connected to other articles through shared AI topics and tags.
Discussion
Sign in to join the discussion
No comments yet — be the first to share your thoughts!