California cements its role as the national testing ground for AI rules
To see where tech policy is going in the U.S., look west: California is escalating its push to regulate AI across multiple fronts. Why it matters: California's multi-pronged approach makes it likely that AI companies in the U.S. will treat the state's rules as a de facto national standard, even as the White House moves to rein in state regulation. It follows a familiar pattern: California acts first, companies adapt to keep doing business there and Congress dithers, eventually ceding its role to states due to gridlock. Driving the news: Gov. Gavin Newsom signed an AI executive order this week as state legislators advance a number of AI bills and consider other regulatory avenues for AI. The big picture: California is moving ahead as the Trump administration pushes for a national AI standar
Could not retrieve the full article text.
Read on Axios Tech →Sign in to highlight and annotate this article

Conversation starters
Daily AI Digest
Get the top 5 AI stories delivered to your inbox every morning.
More about
modelreleaseannounce
Anthropic cuts off the ability to use Claude subscriptions with OpenClaw and third-party AI agents
Are you a subscriber to Anthropic's Claude Pro ($20 monthly) or Max ($100-$200 monthly) plans and use its Claude AI models and products to power third-party AI agents like OpenClaw ? If so, you're in for an unpleasant surprise. Anthropic announced a few hours ago that starting tomorrow, Saturday, April 4, 2026, at 12 pm PT/3 pm ET, it will no longer be possible for those Claude subscribers to use their subscriptions to hook Anthropic's Claude models up to third-party agentic tools, citing the strain such usage was placing on Anthropic's compute and engineering resources, and desire to serve a wide number of users reliably. "We’ve been working hard to meet the increase in demand for Claude, and our subscriptions weren't built for the usage patterns of these third-pa

Latent Reasoning Sprint #3: Activation Difference Steering and Logit Lens
In my previous post I found evidence consistent with the scratchpad paper's compute/store alternation hypothesis — even steps showing higher intermediate answer detection and odd steps showing higher entropy along with results matching “Can we interpret latent reasoning using current mechanistic interpretability tools?”. This post investigates activation steering applied to latent reasoning and examines the resulting performance changes. Quick Summary: Tuned Logit lens sometimes does not find the final answer to a prompt and instead finds a close approximation Tuned Logit lens does not seem to have a consistent location layer or latent where the final answer is positioned. Tuned logit lens variants like ones only trained on latent 3 still only have therefore on odd vectors. Activation stee
Knowledge Map
Connected Articles — Knowledge Graph
This article is connected to other articles through shared AI topics and tags.





Discussion
Sign in to join the discussion
No comments yet — be the first to share your thoughts!