Expectation Error Bounds for Transfer Learning in Linear Regression and Linear Neural Networks
arXiv:2603.28739v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: In transfer learning, the learner leverages auxiliary data to improve generalization on a main task. However, the precise theoretical understanding of when and how auxiliary data help remains incomplete. We provide new insights on this issue in two canonical linear settings: ordinary least squares regression and under-parameterized linear neural networks. For linear regression, we derive exact closed-form expressions for the expected generalization error with bias-variance decomposition, yielding necessary and sufficient conditions for auxiliary — Meitong Liu, Christopher Jung, Rui Li, Xue Feng, Han Zhao
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:In transfer learning, the learner leverages auxiliary data to improve generalization on a main task. However, the precise theoretical understanding of when and how auxiliary data help remains incomplete. We provide new insights on this issue in two canonical linear settings: ordinary least squares regression and under-parameterized linear neural networks. For linear regression, we derive exact closed-form expressions for the expected generalization error with bias-variance decomposition, yielding necessary and sufficient conditions for auxiliary tasks to improve generalization on the main task. We also derive globally optimal task weights as outputs of solvable optimization programs, with consistency guarantees for empirical estimates. For linear neural networks with shared representations of width $q \leq K$, where $K$ is the number of auxiliary tasks, we derive a non-asymptotic expectation bound on the generalization error, yielding the first non-vacuous sufficient condition for beneficial auxiliary learning in this setting, as well as principled directions for task weight curation. We achieve this by proving a new column-wise low-rank perturbation bound for random matrices, which improves upon existing bounds by preserving fine-grained column structures. Our results are verified on synthetic data simulated with controlled parameters.
Subjects:
Machine Learning (cs.LG); Machine Learning (stat.ML)
Cite as: arXiv:2603.28739 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2603.28739v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.28739
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
Submission history
From: Meitong Liu [view email] [v1] Mon, 30 Mar 2026 17:50:52 UTC (238 KB)
Sign in to highlight and annotate this article

Conversation starters
Daily AI Digest
Get the top 5 AI stories delivered to your inbox every morning.
More about
researchpaperarxiv
Roguelike Devlog: Redesigning a Game UI With an AI 2D Game Maker
<p>Sector Scavengers is a spacefaring extraction roguelike where each run feeds a larger civilization-building meta game. This week was all about solving a UI problem that kept getting worse the longer I ignored it: one hub trying to do too much.</p> <p>What I learned quickly is that running both game modes through a single central hub was making both of them worse. Here is how I used Makko to work through it.</p> <h2> When One Screen Tries to Do Everything </h2> <p>My meta progression systems — crew advancement, station building, hardware research, void powers, and card unlocks — were all living in the same HUD as the controls for individual Expedition runs. On paper it sounded efficient. In practice it created a serious information architecture problem.</p> <p>The deeper I got into it, t
New Research Directions in Materials Science with AI - Bioengineer.org
<a href="https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMigwFBVV95cUxNd0wwNmxWampidEpMUC1lUEhkZU9WanN4OHVSSENtalZ0dm5OWkx3Ull2RktEaXJiVkUzRVNxbzMyNlRTcER3eW9YWXZWclhNTE1CcTFkVWdqOTZjdFhDUGxwbjVKWFpwUi14ZllfU19PN25KNlBQSzRicFdCdzdqQ3h2cw?oc=5" target="_blank">New Research Directions in Materials Science with AI</a> <font color="#6f6f6f">Bioengineer.org</font>
Knowledge Map
Connected Articles — Knowledge Graph
This article is connected to other articles through shared AI topics and tags.
More in Research Papers
AI maps science papers to predict research trends two to three years ahead - Tech Xplore
<a href="https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMie0FVX3lxTE5aTkZYTWdaRDZwTXNRMldpMG1WZ1YzWDZTOHN5M183Z3A1ZTFYbnhEWTdPRmpvZnZFU0xodlRsNWxFaGxTcEpwalhJNmJpQWE5VjhaRS1tOXJIeTc5Z0JNblJ3dFd4WjRYZGJOX0NrWGt6ZmZJVTBpRm5wWQ?oc=5" target="_blank">AI maps science papers to predict research trends two to three years ahead</a> <font color="#6f6f6f">Tech Xplore</font>
AI inspires new research topics in materials science - Nanowerk
<a href="https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMiZ0FVX3lxTFBPWlJSM2ExeVQ3LVppTm45NHpEMW9YVkxscThCNDd2OVB0c3J1ZmVCbWNSZWZ0TjZwSzlOdEFXN2UtRk5LU1hxdXd4ZklldGxoM0FZSnhCd19PWkNHQ1ZRVDNwSHNUSk0?oc=5" target="_blank">AI inspires new research topics in materials science</a> <font color="#6f6f6f">Nanowerk</font>

AI maps science papers to predict research trends two to three years ahead
The number of scientific papers is growing so rapidly that scientists are no longer able to keep track of all of them, even in their own research area. Researchers from the Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), in collaboration with scientific partners, have shown how new research ideas can still be obtained from this wealth of information. Using artificial intelligence (AI), they systematically analyzed materials science publications to identify potential new avenues of research. Their results have been published in Nature Machine Intelligence.


Discussion
Sign in to join the discussion
No comments yet — be the first to share your thoughts!